Straight Up |: January 2007 Archives

You could say they rounded up the usual suspects experts -- long on scholarship, long on experience, not as long on influence (to judge from the way the Iraq war has played out), in some key particulars short on insight. It was nothing if not a star-studded conference.

"Iraq, Iran, & Beyond: America Faces the Future" opened with an informal talk by Pat Lang, who offered background. "We invaded the Iraq of our dreams," he said. In other words, "the country was not, in fact, what we thought it to be."

Furthermore, Lang said, differences in values between Americans and Iraqis are so great and so misunderstood, on both sides, that there is no basis for believing they can be overcome in the short term and, he strongly implied, not in the long term, either.

The first panel -- Patrick Clawson, Toby Craig Jones, Dafna Linzer, Lawrence Wright -- addressed the subject of "The Proxy War: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Iran." The conclusion was unanimous (despite huge but unmentioned political differences among the panelists), which made it striking: Conditions in Iraq are so dire that nothing the U.S. can do -- absolutely nothing -- will end the war there.

This means (though the panel didn't say so) all the BananaRepublican talk of a "new" strategy is pure propaganda. Ditto for the accusation that those who oppose it are defeatists. (OK, you knew that.) Wright did say this: "Reading Al Qaeda strategists is like reading a neocon think tank. They want the U.S. to do things they can't do. For instance, take on Iran."

Panel moderator Stephen Simon won the prize for honky weirdness when he said "genocidal killing" in Iraq was not happening because the Shiites do not have the two defining requirements 1) "heavy weaponry" and 2) "broad communal consent." Progroms? Yes. Genocide? No. (In that case, what would he call the genocide in Rwanda? A large pogrom?)

January 28, 2007 11:49 AM |

The state of the union is "strong" wrong. Make that delusional.

Postscript: "Delusional is far too mild a word to describe Dick Cheney." -- Maureen Dowd, 1/27/07

January 24, 2007 7:52 AM |

The President With His Head Up His Ass made a surprise appearance at the National Conference for Media Reform and gave one of his typical brain-addled speeches. It's guaranteed to make you laugh. Then Helen Thomas asked him a few questions:

As Huha said in closing, "If there's questions that has not been answered that's not my fault."

Now stop laughing and watch or listen to Helen Thomas answering questions put to her at the conference by Amy Goodman. The interview aired this morning on Democracy Now! Thomas is withering about Huha and his regime, and about the mainstream media's craven acceptance of the invasion of Iraq -- before the war, during its early years, and for a long time afterward. She didn't use the word "complicity," but others have. It's clearly what she meant. She also talks about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Nixon pardon, Bill Clinton, etc.

And here's a bunch of video excerpts from the conference, featuring Bill Moyers's keynote address and speeches by political luminaries from Bernie Sanders to Jesse Jackson and celebrities from Jane Fonda and Danny Glover to Geena Davis.

January 22, 2007 9:12 AM |

Whenever this ventriloquist's dummy trots out to justify the latest effort by the BananaRepublic to subvert the Constitution, we feel obliged to post his picture.

This time we also offer the latest example of what he calls "good management," his Orwellian term for firing more than a dozen federal prosecutors who've been investigating corruption fostered, protected, or simply allowed, by his enabler and boss, The Bullshitter, a k a the President With His Head Up His Ass.

January 19, 2007 9:58 AM |

That's the title of a new documentary about Boris Lurie, the 80-year-old New York NO! Artist, whose work breaks taboos by combining gassed corpses and nudie pictures, Holocaust realities and sado-masochistic fantasies. "It's not perverted art, but a comment on a perverted society," says Lurie, a survivor of Buchenwald-Magdeburg and other concentration camps, who, not incidentally, draws a line from the Shoah to the war in Iraq.

SHOAH AND PIN-UPS, a film by Reinhild Dettmer-Finke with the collaboration of Matthias Reichelt"Lurie would like to have painted comfortable, comforting things," says Matthias Reichelt, a curator and art historian who collaborated on the film with the director Reinhild Dettmer-Finke. "But something kept him from doing so. And that something is what this film explores."

"Shoah and Pin-Ups" travels from Riga and Buchenwald to the New York of the 1950s and '60s, when NO! Art developed as an obstinate reaction to Pop Art. "NO! is Boris Lurie's motto," says Reichelt. "NO! to the expectations of the art market, NO! to bourgeois decorum, NO! to victim mentality. The film is about the timeless, timely questions of remembering and about coping, through art, with the extermination of the Jews."

The documentary will have a special screening next month (Feb. 23) at Anthology Film Archives in New York. We'll have more to say later.

January 16, 2007 9:08 AM |

Today's national holiday marks the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. He would have been 78. That's younger by five years than two living ex-presidents, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush, and yet he seems a figure from a far more distant past.

Is it because he died so prematurely, killed by an assassin's bullet, at 39? Or does he recede into history because someone of his towering stature is unimaginable in a BananaRepublic led by blustering moral pipsqueaks?

Click these links: 1) to read or watch King's greatest address, the "I have a dream" speech, of Aug. 28, 1963, which he delivered from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, and 2) to hear an audio excerpt of his peerless "Letter From Birmingham Jail," of April 16, 1963. Writing from his cell on a yellow pad of legal-size paper smuggled to him by his attorney, he says:

We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied." We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God-given rights. ... Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging dark of segregation to say, "Wait."

To read the whole letter, click this link. King defends "direct-action nonviolence," explains its principles and expresses his bitter disappointment with white moderates who are "more devoted to 'order' than to justice." Notice he has "almost reached the regrettable conclusion" that they are a bigger stumbling block to freedom and equality for blacks than the White Citizen's Council or the Ku Klux Klan.

Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
January 15, 2007 1:01 AM |

If anybody needed further proof that whatsisface is still flogging the same old bullshit, let him read "The Real Disaster," which pretty much says what needs to be said about his speech on Iraq. It's the lead editorial in this morning's New York Times. (Then compare it with the Washington Post mush and the Los Angeles Times drivel.)

Meanwhile, the same old bullshit is being floated on new lies: "As part of a campaign to market the new strategy, [Prez Huha's] aides insisted that the plan [for more U.S. troops] was largely created by the government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki," David Sanger reports. But, in fact, the Iraqi government "does not really want them," according to another NYT report.


What should be highlighted in big bold print is Huha's comments in a private meeting with Congressional leaders before making his speech. "I said to Maliki this has to work or you're out," Sanger quotes him as saying, according to two officials who were in the room. "Pressed on why he thought this strategy would succeed where previous efforts had failed, [Huha] shot back: 'Because it has to.'"

Really.

The Wall Street Journal naturally supports the President With His Head Up His Ass. In its lead editorial, under the jingoish headline "Mission Baghdad," it ignores reality and claims that "with the new strategy, new forces and new generals [Huha] is putting in place, we have a fighting chance to create a virtuous circle whereby better security leads to more anti-insurgent cooperation from the [Iraqi] public -- which in turn leads to still better security."

Everything just gets better and better.

Its secondary editorial, "A Cynical Opposition," then tries to shift the focus: "The real question is whether the Democrats are prepared to act like a responsible opposition now that they control both houses of Congress, in contrast to the last four years of partisan minority sniping." Ludicrous as that sounds, it's not surprising. Last June The Journal drew this conclusion: "The U.S. has sacrificed too much already in Iraq to withdraw just when victory once again looks possible." [Italics added.]

Which pretty much defines ludicrous.

Finally, it's worth noting the historian Gareth Porter's take on the perverse logic of Huha's war and, most especially, the involvement of Henry Kissinger, whose "sudden emergence as a key figure" in the so-called new Iraq policy "deserves closer examination."

January 11, 2007 10:45 AM |

Take a close look. Does he bear any resemblance to the President With His Head Up His Ass, a k a Prez Huha?

It's Alfred Jarry's woodcut of Père Ubu, better known as Ubu Roi, and it comes to mind as a prelude to Huha's speech tonight because a reader has just suggested Père Bubu (Papa Bubu) or BuBu Roi (King BuBu) as our new moniker for the whatsisface who occupies the White House.

"Maybe a bit literary," he writes, "but fitting for an arts website. And this is the centennial year of Jarry's death."

The staff likes the term, especially the kicky Wikipedia description: "Ubu is a nobody. He is fat, stupid, greedy, cowardly, and evil." But I'm not sure.

When I say Papa Bubu I get a different echo, more of an association with Papa Doc, who terrorized the Haitians under his misrule as an incarnation of the voodoo spirit Baron Samedi in top hat and tails. (His secret police, the Tontons Macoute, did the dirty work.) But while Papa Doc's infamous declaration -- "God and the people are the source of my power. I have twice been given the power. I have taken it, and damn it, I will keep it." -- fits Prez Huha with eery precision, it's all a bit over the top, methinks.

Even Papa Huha (sorry, Prez Huha) would not claim, as Papa Doc did, that he was a voodoo Jesus Christ and God himself, would he? And if he did, I doubt that his evangelical base would buy it. Besides, has Huha ever appeared in public in top hat and tails? Not to my knowledge (although he gave it a try in post-Katrina New Orleans).

January 10, 2007 11:01 AM |

The question was, "Does anyone out there have a suitably demeaning substitute for Bullshitter-in-Chief?" The answers were, "Of course." But the suggested terms, ranging from "d'Oily Farte" and "Mr. Stupid" to "Banana Head," "Fratboy" and "The Dolt," failed to inspire the staff.

So we'll stick with our term, shortened to The Bullshitter. We hope this will underscore his iconic status not just as the first among equals in a fraudulent regime but as an exemplar of fraudulence. From time to time we may also refer to him as the President With His Head Up His Ass, Prez Huha, or PWHHUHA (the other acronym).

January 8, 2007 10:45 AM |

If it's true he hasn't seen the video of Saddam Hussein's execution, as the White House claims, will somebody please explain why not? Is it because it would offend his compassionate soul? Or is it because he would have to describe how he felt about it? And you know what a mumbler he is.

He's already said what he's been told to say by his handlers. (The execution should have been "more dignified.") Presumably, they saw the video. But shouldn't he see for himself what millions of others have seen? If he's too sensitive to watch the raw execution video, he could watch the not-so raw video.

Shouldn't he know first-hand what's happening before he makes next week's do-over speech about his latest "new" strategy for Iraq? (Not that it would make a difference.) Or has he watched the execution video, while munching on popcorn, and that's a national security secret?

January 5, 2007 12:06 PM |

He has called himself The Decider. Now he wants to be known as The Cooperator? So it would seem from the ghostwritten gas of his horseshit op-ed column in today's Wall Street Journal.


We're still mulling a suitably demeaning term to substitute for our customary Bullshitter-in-Chief. Based on the column's "I believe" graf, one staffer has suggested The Believer.

Here's the graf, with footnotes for clarification:

I believe that when America is willing to use her influence abroad, the American people are safer and the world is more secure.1 I believe that wealth does not come from government. It comes from the hard work of America's workers, entrepreneurs and small businesses.2 I believe government closest to the people is more responsive and accountable.3 I believe government plays an important role in helping those who can't help themselves. Yet we must always remember that when people are hurting, they need a caring person, not a government bureaucracy.4

1 This is why I ordered up the war in Iraq.
2 This is why I believe in tax relief for the rich and nothing at all for the poor.
3 This is why I'm ignoring the midterm elections and am sending more troops to Iraq.
4 This is why I will pray everyday for the flood victims in New Orleans.

January 3, 2007 9:56 AM |

It's the new year, so nu? What's the point of leaving the old one at the top of this column? There is no point. It just signals my hangover -- not from too many champagne toasts, but too few. There wasn't much to celebrate unless it was the hope that 2007 will bring us closer to the end of our collective humiliation by the Bullshitter-in-Chief and his BananaRepublic.

It could happen. But the Bullshitter's remarks about the Iraq war, as reported this morning in The New York Times, make it doubtful. "What I want to hear from you is how we're going to win, not how we're going to leave," he is quoted as warning the military's top brass. He still insists on talking about victory, the report notes (italics added), because, he claims, "It's a word the American people understand."

Sure. Why should he accept the blame for his own catastrophic failure? Blame everyone else. The warning and the victory talk merely reaffirm his arrogance, incompetence and deceit. Which leads to a niggling little matter. What should he be called these days? Given current conditions as shown by his highly unfavorable poll ratings, our customary term of reference may have outlasted its usefulness.

Does anyone out there have a suitably demeaning substitute for Bullshitter-in-Chief? The staff likes "Junior," per Maureen Dowd, for its connotation of a lightweight. But I'd much prefer something that goes with the "head-up-his-ass" photo (originally posted here in 2005, when a staff conscript sent it per the ravages of Katrina).

January 2, 2007 11:24 AM |

Me Elsewhere

Sites to See

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries written by Straight Up | in January 2007.

Straight Up |: December 2006 is the previous archive.

Straight Up |: February 2007 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

special
Program Notes
the blog of the National Performing Arts Convention
culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
CultureGulf
Rebuilding Gulf Culture after Katrina
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Stage Write
Elizabeth Zimmer on time-based art forms

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.