I am old enough to remember a time when famous pianists were great pianists. It is a topic I rehearse with pianists of my acquaintance who like myself began attending recitals in the 1960s. So we heard Argerich, Arrau, Cliburn, Curzon, Gilels, Horowitz, Moravec, Serkin, Richter, Rubinstein. Some of us (not me) were lucky to hear Kempff and Michelangeli, who were not regular visitors to the US. These artists were very different from one another – which is the point. They were personalities. (I also discover joking agreement that Pollini, though famous, was an exception proving the rule.)
Today – our discourse continues – anyone can be a famous pianist. Attire and social media play a disproportionate role. Lately, however, a couple of young Koreans – Yunchan Lim and Seong-Jin Cho — seem the genuine article: young pianists who might become both famous and great. They cultivate a personal style. And it seems driven from within, not imposed from without.
But Lim has stumbled. His new Decca release – his first studio recording – is a mistake. The music is Tchaikovsky’s The Seasons: a collection of twelve cameos, one for each month. I learned about it from Dave Hurwitz’s rambunctious “Classics Today” review on youtube. “The tunes are broken up into globular little gestures,” Hurwitz (who has a sense of humor) intones. “A fetish for articulation draws attention to itself.” The interpretations are crushed by “mannerism and gesture.” Amateur pianists “would do it better because they would do less.”
My curiosity was aroused because I adore these little Tchaikovsky pieces. I have played them myself for decades. My favorite is “October” – the mind’s eye envisions an iconic Russian vignette of red and yellow leaves adrift above a solitary forest path. A leisurely performance lasts five minutes. Lim’s recorded performance lasts six minutes. His personal inflections, coloring every sad leaf, fracture Tchaikovsky’s picture into a mosaic of subjective detail. As the playing, per se, is beautifully nuanced — Lim is unquestionably a poet whose every gesture is sincere — this failure becomes interesting. Why is “October” so fragile?
The answer, I would say, is that it exudes an intimate scent of nostalgia, a yearning for days bygone, that the 21-year-old pianist doesn’t share. It is in fact an exquisite exercise in memory no longer accessible to composers and – given the nature of the times in which we now live — increasingly alien to performers and audiences.
The earlier Romantic keyboard cameos of Schumann, though a likely influence on Tchaikovsky, can be wistful. But they’re not stranded in the past. The composer who most parallels Tchaikovsky is Grieg, in his 65 Lyric Pieces for piano. On a grand scale, there is the nostalgia of Rachmaninoff. The musical retrospection of these composers traverses long corridors of time past. It builds upon itself.
I would call Tchaikovsky’s “October” a double act of retrospection. It begins impersonally, with its forest tableau. But the middle section introduces a second, more personal voice, in dialogue with the tune at hand. This interaction rapidly drives to a piercing climax. A reprise follows. The morendo (“dying”) coda — seven measures long, diminishing to pppp — is tragic. And so we have remembered both the forest path and a further stabbing memory occasioned by those falling leaves.
You can sample Lim’s performance here. An extraordinary version of the same music, in live performance, is that of Mikhail Pletnev, here. Pletnev is an idiosyncratic artist invested in Romantic liberties of voicing and rubato. He is also, obviously, keenly cognizant of his Russian cultural inheritance. I would be surprised if he were not a devoted reader of Russian literature and a connoisseur of Russian visual art.
Pletnev also excels in Grieg’s Lyric Pieces. Among the biggest of these is “Vanished Days” (Op 57, No. 1). Its falling motion, in D minor, limns a chromatic haze of memory. Misted ascents in the left hand streak the tune as it recedes ever deeper into the past. An Allegro vivace middle section, in D major, discloses an earlier memory – of youth. It gathers strength before sinking back into the minor. A fortissimo climax ensues, then a hopeless Adagio terminus. You can hear Pletnev play “Vanished Days” here. Many another Lyric Piece layers memories in similar fashion. The titles include “Homesickness,” “From Days of Youth,” “Gone,” and – coming last — “Remembrances.”
Grieg was born in Bergen. He remained there, late in life, even though the climate proved fatal to his health. There were 30,000 residents, with his Troldhaugen on the outskirts of town. He called his Norway “north of civilization.” This was said in frustration, but it was a lover’s frustration. Rustic Norwegian dance and ceremony were his musical lifeblood. He also drew on Nordic myth. In 1905 he read (in English) Tchaikovsky’s Life and Letters (the book by the composer’s brother Modeste) and recorded: “What a noble and true person! And what a melancholy joy to continue in this way the personal acquaintance established in Leipzig in 1888! It is as if a friend were speaking to me.” Tchaikovsky wrote of Grieg’s music: “What enchantment, what spontaneity and richness in the musical inventiveness! What warmth and passion in his singing phrases, what a fountain of pulsating life in his harmonies, what originality and entrancing distinctiveness in his clever and piquant modulations.”
Tchaikovsky died in 1893, Grieg in 1907. Then came the Great War – its senseless origins and peculiar ferocity. It introduced gas warfare, barbed wire, and the machine gun. It cost eight million soldiers’ lives. At the Battle of the Somme, the largest military engagement in recorded history, eleven British divisions arose along a thirteen-mile front and began walking forward. Out of 110,00 attackers, 60,000 were killed in the first day. As early as 1915, The New Republic pertinently inquired, “Is it not a possibility that what is today taking place marks quite as complete a bankruptcy of ideas, systems, society, as did the French Revolution?” Americans were left pondering why men had died, as Ezra Pound wrote, “for a botched civilization.” “The plunge of civilization into this abyss of blood and darkness,” wrote Henry James, “is a thing that . . . gives away the whole long age during which we have supposed the world to be, with whatever abatement, gradually bettering.” The cost to the arts has many times been surmised. The war discredited cultural nationalism. It erased nobility of sentiment. It cluttered with obstacles the long corridors of memory that Tchaikovsky and Grieg had gently suffused with nostalgia.
One of the reasons Charles Ives is the supreme American concert composer is that, unlike Aaron Copland, he was fortunate to come of age before World War I. He was profoundly invested in American cultural memory: the Civil War and slavery; the Founding Fathers and the Revolution. His memories of Danbury were pre-war memories: the circus band marching down Main Street, the sentimental songs of the parlor.
It is in the bygone parlor that The Seasons and the Lyric Pieces best belong. We can still reconnect to these pieces at Carnegie Hall — but they grow ever more elusive.
I can still remember my bedtime song, as a baby. My mother would sing it wordlessly – Grieg’s Second Norwegian Dance.
Some more piano blogs:
–On “ripeness,” Claudio Arrau, and Yunchan Lim, click here
–On Sergei Babayan, click here
–On Babayan, Danill Trifonov, and Yuja Wang, click here
–On Vladimir and Bernie Horowitz, click here
–On Alexander Toradze, click here
–On Pedro Carbone and Spanish music, click here
Leave a Reply