• Home
  • About
    • What’s happening here
    • Greg Sandow
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Sandow

Greg Sandow on the future of classical music

What orchestras could do for David Bowie

January 14, 2016 by Greg Sandow

[contextly_auto_sidebar]

Belatedly, concerning David Bowie…

I was very much moved by his final album, Blackstar. Made while he was dying, though no one knew he was. Now we know its subject was his death. It’s dark and powerful. So deeply connected to life, because so deeply entwined with death. There’s nothing quite like it, if only because making an album involves so many people, and is thus a public event. And artists making art about their death — to the extent that art like that ever happens — would normally not do it with so many (even if unknowing) collaborators.

A question

bowie blogBut now I want to ask: Do classical music institutions think that Bowie’s death had anything to do with them?

The Seattle Symphony, at least, tweeted something strong. But I can make a case for any big-time classical group to pay great attention, and react publicly.

  • Why? Because Bowie’s passing as a major cultural event. Maybe the biggest I’ve seen in recent years. The New York Times — this is one way to measure cultural heft — did more than 20 Bowie pieces after he died. David Bowie Dies at 69; Star Transcended Music, Art and Fashion. David Bowie Allowed His Art to Deliver a Final Message (about Bowie’s final album, which, until he died, no one knew was about the death he knew was coming). All the Young Bands: The Artists David Bowie Championed. How David Bowie Challenged MTV on Race. “Thank You, Mr. Bowie. You Changed Our Lives.” How David Bowie Changed Wall Street. David Bowie’s Fashion Legacy. David Bowie in the Movies.

The British Prime Minister tweeted. So did the German Foregin Ministry, remembering Bowie’s song about the Berlin Wall.

And so many just plain people — including many in classical music — had their own strong memories.

What could be done?

But what could, let’s say, a symphony orchestra do?

Well, it could make available quotes from its musicians. Can’t tell me that in the Cleveland Orchestra, for example, there aren’t musicians as deeply moved by Bowie as everybody else. By letting this be known, an orchestra shows something crucial, in our present age — shows that it lives in the same world as everyone else.

And there’s music to program. Philip Glass’s Symphony No. 1 and Symphony No. 4, based on Bowie albums, Low and Heroes. Maybe other things, too, but the Glass pieces are an obvious choice.

Of course an orchestra, to be timely, would have to tear up its programming this week, and quickly learn these pieces. Which could be troublesome, quite beyond the rush, because maybe the guest conductor coming in this week doesn’t want to lead those works.

Serious questions, all of those. And yet, if an orchestra really wanted to play these symphonies, it could. If not this week, just after the death, then next week, or anyway quickly enough so it would still feel like a memorial.

Bowie, we should remember, was treated as an artist when he died. And he was an arts figure. I used to see him in the ‘80s at openings at the BAM Next Wave. And he was otherwise active. A real figure in the arts.

Missed opportunities

But then it just doesn’t seem likee something orchestras (or classical music institutions in general) do, to react in some major way to events. Yes, there can be moments of silence for a national tragedy. Or the New York Philharmonic, in the wake of 9/11, could specially do the Brahms Requiem. Of course there are other examples.

But I remember a conversation I had in 1991, when Miles Davis died. I happened to be talking to the then-publicist for the New York Philharmonic, and I asked her if she’d thought of making Philharmonic trumpet players available to the media, to say how much they loved Miles. No way a trumpet player wouldn’t have listened to him.

Her answer? “Oh, they don’t want to talk about that. They want to talk about Lenny Bernstein.”

Very old school. Don’t know that anyone would talk quite that way today. (Though whether they’d put their trumpet players out there would be another quesion. I hope they would.)

And when Gorecki’s Third Symphony became a sensation in the early ‘90s, I don’t remember that any major orchestra (at least in the US) programmed it. I could be wrong; I didn’t get around as much then as I do now, and of course we didn’t have the Internet to give us information.

But still. Here we had a deeply serious orchestral work that in Britain went to No. 6 on the pop album chart. It didn’t have equivalent success in the US, but it was listened to. Rock critics put it on their 10-best lists. One pop publicist I knew spent her own time publicizing the recording, though that wasn’t her job (and of course the album wasn’t on her label), simply because she felt people should hear it.

It would have made sense, then, for orchestras to program the piece. They would have sold tickets. But, going deeper, they would have touched a cultural vein, connected with people who didn’t normally listen to new classical music (or any classical music), but were listening to this.

I know our institutions plan things years in advance, and have some institutional equivalent of hardened arteries. But they should learn to be more flexible.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Gavin Borchert says

    January 15, 2016 at 12:56 am

    The Seattle Symphony, as it happens, played the Gorecki in May 1995, which was not terribly soon after the 1992 recording topped the charts—

  2. Jo says

    January 15, 2016 at 4:44 am

    The phrase ‘rock and a hard place’ struck me when reading this I’m afraid. You want this, Greg, but equally there’s the other person who reads an orchestra’s tribute or sees a concert programme changed, and responds by telling us how disgusted they are that we are “jumping on a bandwagon”, that our tribute is insincere because we had no “real connection” to this person. Damned if we do; damned if we don’t.

  3. gloria rossi menedes says

    January 18, 2016 at 6:21 am

    The paradigm/ old story phrase moment of your article caught me.

    The ” New Story ” which David Bowie luminously contributed toward…….when an artist creates new Mythologies in this best of all possible worlds, who breaks barriers of old forms and presents new ” forms ” Plato style, that resonate with such intensity…..the world is forever uplifted expanded altered….

    Yes a massive Global outpouring at the physical passing of David Bowie demonstrates the import of his artistry.

    As well the inherent realization that culture and nature might be the two forces that could save ” us “, is a compelling call to release “old story” which includes worries about the “classical” honouring project as offensive or commercializing or ” jumping on the band wagon” too soon.

    State the mission of the Work with authenticity and your audience will applaud.

    David Bowie s legacy is toward New Story….coming from unique radical artistic expression…..he exemplified the courage to create….his soul his mind his muse were brilliantly intertwined and his flamboyance offered with an astonishing humility.

    Yeah, New Story! Times up! Unified creativity…..

    all good

    GRM

  4. Brian Robins says

    January 18, 2016 at 7:56 am

    Why this weird idea that we must all be obsessed with Bowie’s death? The whole response was grossly exaggerated. Get real and recognise that there are actually people out there who have lived a full and involved life without David Bowie entering into it in any way at all.

Greg Sandow

Though I've been known for many years as a critic, most of my work these days involves the future of classical music -- defining classical music's problems, and finding solutions for them. Read More…

About The Blog

This started as a blog about the future of classical music, my specialty for many years. And largely the blog is still about that. But of course it gets involved with other things I do — composing music, and teaching at Juilliard (two courses, here … [Read More...]

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

Archives

@gsandow

Tweets by @gsandow

Resources

How to write a press release

As a footnote to my posts on classical music publicists, and how they could do better, here's a post I did in 2005 -- wow, 11 years ago! --  about how to make press releases better. My examples may seem fanciful, but on the other hand, they're almost … [Read More...]

The future of classical music

Here's a quick outline of what I think the future of classical music will be. Watch the blog for frequent updates! I Classical music is in trouble, and there are well-known reasons why. We have an aging audience, falling ticket sales, and — in part … [Read More...]

Timeline of the crisis

Here — to end my posts on the dates of the classical music crisis  — is a detailed crisis timeline. The information in it comes from many sources, including published reports, blog comments by people who saw the crisis develop in their professional … [Read More...]

Before the crisis

Yes, the classical music crisis, which some don't believe in, and others think has been going on forever. This is the third post in a series. In the first, I asked, innocently enough, how long the classical music crisis (which is so widely talked … [Read More...]

Four keys to the future

Here, as promised, are the key things we need to do, if we're going to give classical music a future. When I wrote this, I was thinking of people who present classical performances. But I think it applies to all of us — for instance, to people who … [Read More...]

Age of the audience

Conventional wisdom: the classical music audience has always been the age it is now. Here's evidence that it used to be much younger. … [Read More...]

Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in