• Home
  • About
    • What’s happening here
    • Greg Sandow
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Sandow

Greg Sandow on the future of classical music

Colorado footnotes, and advice

March 26, 2012 by Greg Sandow

First an apology. In my first recent post about the Colorado Symphony, I mangled the link to my January post on that orchestra. Which you can find here.

And now a clarification, in case it’s needed.

I didn’t slam the Colorado Symphony, in my last post, because they’re high on any agenda I might have. They aren’t. But if you read what I posted last January, you’ll see that I was hopeful about the new direction they’d announced, both because they boldly stated what their problems were, and because they proposed some major changes. I hoped the changes might pan out for them.

But last week I read their business plan — which had stated both the problem and proposed solutions — and found it sadly wanting. So I thought I should mention that. Especially when one of the failures was really blatant. In January you publish a business plan, which among much else projects income you’ll be earning in the future — starting next season — from concerts in the summer, which you’ve never given before.

And then on March 8 you announce what’s going to happen next season, and summer concerts aren’t part of it. Which means your business plan may well be only words. You don’t seem to be putting it into action.

So, look. I’m not on the Colorado Symphony’s case. But since — because I thought I liked what they were doing — I’ve uncovered what looks like a major failure, I’ll offer this advice:

They should take the business plan off their website — right now.

And, as soon as they can, they should issue a statement what the status of the former plan might be — why they didn’t schedule the summer concerts that it called for, and what their plan is now.

If they don’t do these things…well, quite honestly, they look like fools.

My thought, for whatever it might be worth to them.

Filed Under: changes

Comments

  1. Markand Thakar says

    March 27, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    “concerts in the summer, which you’ve never given before…”???

    I was Associate Conductor of the Colorado Symphony in 1994-96, and I assure you that I conducted numerous summer concerts.

    • Greg Sandow says

      March 27, 2012 at 2:38 pm

      Bad choice of words on my part. I should — more accurately — have said, “concerts in the summer, which you aren’t giving now.”

  2. josefina gruene says

    March 28, 2012 at 11:25 pm

    First an apology. In my first recent post about the Colorado Symphony, I mangled the link to my January post on that orchestra. Which you can find here. And now a clarification, in case it’s needed. I didn’t slam the Colorado Symphony, in my last post, because they’re high on any agenda I might have. They aren’t. But if you read what I posted last January, you’ll see that I was hopeful about the new direction they’d announced, both because they boldly stated what their problems were, and because they proposed some major changes.
    I didn’t slam the Colorado Symphony, in my last post, because they’re high on any agenda I might have. They aren’t.
    But if you read what I posted last January, which you can find here, you’ll see.

    see what?

    • Greg Sandow says

      March 30, 2012 at 10:40 am

      I’m puzzled, Josefina. You couldn’t read the full post? The sentence definitely continues.

  3. John P says

    March 29, 2012 at 8:25 am

    I’ve learned from a post on our “Save the Colorado Symphony Web Site” that summer concerts ARE scheduled. Why they weren’t announced, or even that the concerts would take place, weren’t announced, I don’t know. But according to a member of the orchestra, summer concerts ARE on the schedule. That said, I still think that the CSO has been less than agressive in providing its base with regular updates on the progress of its business plan. I continue to be troubled by the lack of specificity moving forward. In an earlier post, I called their plan — in many respects — a plan to have a plan. And without that second level of planning — spelling out specifics and engaging community stakeholders — we don’t really know if there’s any ‘there’ there.

Greg Sandow

Though I've been known for many years as a critic, most of my work these days involves the future of classical music -- defining classical music's problems, and finding solutions for them. Read More…

About The Blog

This started as a blog about the future of classical music, my specialty for many years. And largely the blog is still about that. But of course it gets involved with other things I do — composing music, and teaching at Juilliard (two courses, here … [Read More...]

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

Archives

@gsandow

Tweets by @gsandow

Resources

How to write a press release

As a footnote to my posts on classical music publicists, and how they could do better, here's a post I did in 2005 -- wow, 11 years ago! --  about how to make press releases better. My examples may seem fanciful, but on the other hand, they're almost … [Read More...]

The future of classical music

Here's a quick outline of what I think the future of classical music will be. Watch the blog for frequent updates! I Classical music is in trouble, and there are well-known reasons why. We have an aging audience, falling ticket sales, and — in part … [Read More...]

Timeline of the crisis

Here — to end my posts on the dates of the classical music crisis  — is a detailed crisis timeline. The information in it comes from many sources, including published reports, blog comments by people who saw the crisis develop in their professional … [Read More...]

Before the crisis

Yes, the classical music crisis, which some don't believe in, and others think has been going on forever. This is the third post in a series. In the first, I asked, innocently enough, how long the classical music crisis (which is so widely talked … [Read More...]

Four keys to the future

Here, as promised, are the key things we need to do, if we're going to give classical music a future. When I wrote this, I was thinking of people who present classical performances. But I think it applies to all of us — for instance, to people who … [Read More...]

Age of the audience

Conventional wisdom: the classical music audience has always been the age it is now. Here's evidence that it used to be much younger. … [Read More...]

Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in