• Home
  • About
    • What’s happening here
    • Greg Sandow
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Sandow

Greg Sandow on the future of classical music

In C, in the Wall Street Journal

May 2, 2009 by Greg Sandow

My Wall Street Journal piece on In C, that is — about the triumphant Carnegie Hall anniversary celebration. Which I loved. But beyond that, I found myself getting wistful, wishing that the ’60s had changed the classical music mainstream. Doesn’t matter, in the long run. Change is coming anyway.

The 1960s didn’t do much for classical music in America, or at least they didn’t change the major concert halls. Musicians didn’t grow long hair, and the same familiar masterworks went on being played.

But outside the mainstream, a classical-music counterculture did develop…

To read the rest of it, go here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Richard Mitnick says

    May 2, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    Very nice piece. And, you got your own background color.

    >>RSM

    Thanks! Now if only it was a background color that changed each time someone looked at it…

  2. Robert Berger says

    May 5, 2009 at 9:35 am

    This concert certainly sounds like quite an experience. Curiously,i’ve never heard In C,although I’ve heard a fair amount of minimalist music,and I’ll have to get hands on a recording as soom as possible.

    But unfortunately, your article does a grave disservice to our mainstream orchestras and other groups. Sure, minimalist music like this is fine, but why did you make it sound as though our mainstream orchestras are such stodgy,hidebound institutions which do nothing but endlessly recycle the same old familiar pieces from the past?

    You completely ignored the enormous number of new works they have performed since the once chic counterculture 60s, but such great composers as Carter,Boulez,Henze,Tippett,Lutoslawski,Meissaen, Saariaho, Tan Dun, Takemitsu,Adams, Rorem,and so many other contemporary composers, and also minimalists such as Glass and Reich.

    So what if they perform music from the past? What are they supposed to do anyway, just play new music? The fact is that we need both new and old music. We can’t do without either.They are in no way mutually exclusive.

  3. Paul H. Muller says

    May 7, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Before I heard “In C” I downloaded the score. It all looked a bit confusing and reading the notes for performance – players starting and stopping cells when they felt like it – I thought: “This can’t possibly work..”

    But I entered a few of the cells into my notation program and played them back and it was like a light bulb went on. So that’s how it works!

    “In C” really opened my eyes and ears to the possibilities of minimalism.

    Thanks for telling us about this, Paul. We should all be as curious and enterprising as you are. I doubt a piece like In C is easy to create. Riley had fabulous instincts, I think.

    If you ever listen to a recording, I’d be curious to know if the piece takes shape in ways you don’t expect, or if your test with your notation software told you all you need to know (quite possible).

  4. johnzero says

    May 10, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    But Greg… why did no one ever write “In F”?

    Somehow, thats the problem with classical music, and frankly, with composers. “In C” is wonderful, but the IDEA of “In C” didn’t take.

    Hey Greg… if you compose “In Bb”, I’ll play guitar at the premier. Deal?

  5. Michael Monroe says

    May 14, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Hey johnzero, here’s your “in B-flat.”

    http://www.inbflat.net/

    This is just wonderful. By all means follow the link! Thanks, Michael.

Greg Sandow

Though I've been known for many years as a critic, most of my work these days involves the future of classical music -- defining classical music's problems, and finding solutions for them. Read More…

About The Blog

This started as a blog about the future of classical music, my specialty for many years. And largely the blog is still about that. But of course it gets involved with other things I do — composing music, and teaching at Juilliard (two courses, here … [Read More...]

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

Archives

@gsandow

Tweets by @gsandow

Resources

How to write a press release

As a footnote to my posts on classical music publicists, and how they could do better, here's a post I did in 2005 -- wow, 11 years ago! --  about how to make press releases better. My examples may seem fanciful, but on the other hand, they're almost … [Read More...]

The future of classical music

Here's a quick outline of what I think the future of classical music will be. Watch the blog for frequent updates! I Classical music is in trouble, and there are well-known reasons why. We have an aging audience, falling ticket sales, and — in part … [Read More...]

Timeline of the crisis

Here — to end my posts on the dates of the classical music crisis  — is a detailed crisis timeline. The information in it comes from many sources, including published reports, blog comments by people who saw the crisis develop in their professional … [Read More...]

Before the crisis

Yes, the classical music crisis, which some don't believe in, and others think has been going on forever. This is the third post in a series. In the first, I asked, innocently enough, how long the classical music crisis (which is so widely talked … [Read More...]

Four keys to the future

Here, as promised, are the key things we need to do, if we're going to give classical music a future. When I wrote this, I was thinking of people who present classical performances. But I think it applies to all of us — for instance, to people who … [Read More...]

Age of the audience

Conventional wisdom: the classical music audience has always been the age it is now. Here's evidence that it used to be much younger. … [Read More...]

Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in