• Home
  • About
    • Jumper
    • Diane Ragsdale
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Jumper

Diane Ragsdale on what the arts do and why

AJ Discussion: Lead or Follow?

January 23, 2012 by Diane Ragsdale 3 Comments

In lieu of a Jumper post this week I have written a post (If this is leading, what is following?) for the Arts Journal Discussion, Lead or Follow.  Here’s the question that launched the debate, posed by AJ’s Doug McLennan:

Increasingly, audiences have more visibility for their opinions about the culture they consume. Cultural institutions know more and more about their audiences and their wants. Some suggest this new transparency argues for a different relationship between artists and audience.  So the question: In this age of self expression and information overload, do our artists and arts organizations need to lead more or learn to follow their communities more?

Doug McClennan has put together a diverse group of debaters: the Kennedy Center’s MichaelKaiser; John Holden of Demos; Chad Bauman, marketing director at ArenaStage; Michael Phillips, movie critic of the Chicago Tribune; culturalhistorian Lynne Conner; Josephine Ramirez, program officer at theIrvine Foundation; Jenny Byrd, a graduate student in arts management at Claremont Graduate University; Bob Harlow, an arts consultant; Stephanie Barron, curator at the LA County Museum of Art; Roberto Bedoya,director of the Tucson Pima Arts Council; Kelly Tweeddale, executive director of Seattle Opera; Trisha Mead, Director of Marketing and Communications for Oregon Ballet Theatre; and Stanford Thompson,Executive Director for the El Sistema-inspired program, Play On, Philly!

I hope you’ll check it out and jump into the discussion.

And if you want to know what the onion is about, read the post. 😉

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Andy Buelow says

    January 25, 2012 at 4:49 am

    Diane, I have the deepest respect for your ideas and often find them uplifting and inspiring. Your speech about “stop selling excellence and start brokering relationships” is one I refer to all the time with my board.

    So I hope you will take that into account when I say that although I think I understand the points you are making in the “Lead or Follow” post, I find the way it is couched very dispiriting. The comments about us arts administrators and organizations all “duping, objectifying and devaluing” our audiences just seems like a huge generalization. Michael Kaiser’s viewpoints don’t necessarily reflect those of all fine arts organization leaders — they certainly don’t reflect mine.

    I felt similarly deflated by the January 3 post, in which we were all seemingly lumped into a category of “wealthy, well-educated white people” trying to impose our elitist standards on the rest of the world.

    Again I think you make some valid points, but I find these generalizations rather depressing. Maybe these things are more true of the major urban arts institutions, which are more hidebound by tradition, but down here at the level of smaller, part-time professional orchestras, operas and theater groups we are trying very hard to engage with our audiences and communities and provide them with vibrant, if not “world class” (whatever that means) arts experiences — and yes, sell tickets to them.

    Thanks for constantly pushing and urging us to do better, think differently, be courageous… but at least from where I stand we could use a little gentleness too.

    Reply
    • Mike Tremblay says

      March 11, 2012 at 8:48 am

      In the debate, Lead or Follow, Kelly Tweeddale makes a good point, which I interpret as her concern that, in my words, art organisations tend to breath each other’s air too much. Andy’s point, in this thread, I think represents the difficulty arts organisations are having in a more highly connected, and perhaps more ‘immediate’ or ‘on demand’ world. Capturing the essence of a culture’s artistic endowment is a challenge as it is one of the few ways we have for the past to speak to the present and inform our future thinking. This requires making choices independently of the ‘now’ itself and is where leadership of a sort is needed (the sort of leadership that seeks to understand and incorporate a vision rather than the usual strategic leadership stuff from business schools, as the leadership here is ‘on behalf of the culture’ and is therefore empowered to act, it is not sui generis.

      The difficulty for these organisations is what is there role in presenting the present in the 21st century and that requires completely different thinking and may be misrepresented by a simple lead/follow logic. One aspect of the Tao refers to leadership as more like midwifery and that represents a way to collapse the dichotomy. It doesn’t however tell arts organisations what to do.

      (I posted the other day on my own blog (http://www.skythunder.net/?cat=31) a note on how digital technology might be used to create user generated experiences of art and a simple technology that is available today, that might give new thinking to the leader/follower challenge.)

      Reply
  2. Diane Ragsdale says

    January 25, 2012 at 6:50 am

    Andy,
    Thank you for the post and rightfully taking me to task for not qualifying my statement. You are right: there are many fine arts organizations that are in dialogue with their communities (yours among them). And I try in my posts to make the point that some organizations are doing very good work (and to even give examples). This is a good reminder for the future. Thanks, again.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Mike Tremblay Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Diane Ragsdale

Diane Ragsdale is an Assistant Professor in the College of Performing Arts at The New School, where she also serves as Program Director for the MA in Arts Management and Entrepreneurship. Alongside her post at the New School Diane teaches on the Cultural Leadership Program at Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity in Canada and teaches a workshop on Cultural Policy at Yale University for its Theater Management MA. She is also a doctoral candidate at Erasmus University Rotterdam (in the Netherlands), where she lectured 2011-2015 in the cultural economics and sociology of the arts programs. Read More…

Jumper

White's Tree Frog

About 20 years ago, when I was in graduate school, I came across the following poem: When an old pond gets a new frog it’s a new pond. I think the inverse also may be true. I’ve often been the new frog jumping into an old pond. Since 1988, I’ve worked in the arts in the US in various roles … [Read More...]

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

@DERagsdale

Tweets by @DERagsdale

Recent Comments

  • Richard Linzer on On Aesthetics, Ethics, Economics, and Consequential Decisions of Cultural Leaders in the Long Now: “Diane, the free manuals that we have created on fully secured borrowing for arts nonprofits, other nonprofits, and individual artists…” Jan 11, 20:48
  • Jon Catherwood-Ginn on On Aesthetics, Ethics, Economics, and Consequential Decisions of Cultural Leaders in the Long Now: “Diane and Jerry – thank you so much for your thoughtful responses to my question! Excellent points regarding the opportunity…” Oct 13, 21:08
  • Jerry Yoshitomi on On Aesthetics, Ethics, Economics, and Consequential Decisions of Cultural Leaders in the Long Now: “Thanks to both of you for your thoughts. One of the great opportunities available through electronic communications will be the…” Oct 6, 01:20
  • Diane Ragsdale on On Aesthetics, Ethics, Economics, and Consequential Decisions of Cultural Leaders in the Long Now: “Dear Jon, thanks for your comment and great question! I’d also be curious what others reading the post might think.…” Oct 5, 09:20
  • Jon Catherwood-Ginn on On Aesthetics, Ethics, Economics, and Consequential Decisions of Cultural Leaders in the Long Now: “Thank you for this, Diane! A fantastic piece. As an extension of your analysis of the interplay among economics, ethics,…” Oct 2, 20:41

Approaching Beauty Course Posts

On artistic leadership and aesthetic values in a changed cultural context: A new keynote address

Last week I had the privilege, pleasure, and honor to give the keynote address at the Canadian Arts Summit--an annual gathering of the board chairs, … [Read More...]

Art for ____________’s sake. What would you fill in?

A few weeks back I was in NYC and had the opportunity to attend a Public Forum event featuring the brilliant Jeremy McCarter reading from his new book … [Read More...]

Irvine asks: Is there an issue in the arts field more urgent than engagement? My answer: Yes.

A couple weeks back the Irvine Foundation launched an online Q&A series, Are We Doing Enough?—aimed at “exploring tough questions about engagement … [Read More...]

A Q&A on the Beauty Class with Students from the SAIC

Recently, I received an email from a student at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, preparing for a seminar on Arts Organizations in Society. … [Read More...]

It’s creative; but is it beautiful? (My talk at the Pave Symposium on Entrepreneurship and the Arts)

In May, I gave a talk at the Pave Biennial Symposium on Arts & Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University. The theme of this year's conference … [Read More...]

Archives

Subscribe to Jumper by Email

Enter your email address:

A Few Things I’ve Written

"Surviving the Culture Change", "The Excellence Barrier", "Holding Up the Arts: Can We Sustain What We've Creatived? Should We?" and "Living in the Struggle: Our Long Tug of War in the Arts" are a few keynote addresses I've given in the US and abroad on the larger changes in the cultural environment and ways arts organizations may need to adapt in order to survive and thrive in the coming years.

If you want a quicker read, then you may want to skip the speeches and opt for the article, "Recreating Fine Arts Institutions," which was published in the November 2009 Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Here is a recent essay commissioned by the Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts for the 2011 State of the Arts Conference in London, "Rethinking Cultural Philanthropy".

In 2012 I documented a meeting among commercial theater producers and nonprofit theater directors to discuss partnerships between the two sectors in the development of new theatrical work, which is published by HowlRound. You can get a copy of this report, "In the Intersection," on the HowlRound Website. Finally, last year I also had essays published in Doug Borwick's book, Building Communities Not Audiences and Theatre Bay Area's book (edited by Clay Lord), Counting New Beans.

Categories

  • artistic home
  • Artistic Standards & Quality
  • arts conferences
  • Arts Education
  • arts facilities
  • Asymmetric power dynamics
  • beauty
  • community
  • Democratization of Culture
  • Economic Impact Studies
  • engagement
  • entrepreneurship
  • ethics
  • Funder Jargon
  • Innovation
  • institutionalism
  • interdependence
  • intrinsic value
  • leadership
  • nonprofit model
  • nonprofits and information disclosure
  • philanthropy
  • Pricing
  • purpose
  • subsidization of the arts
  • succession planning
  • Supply/Demand
  • sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Undercapitalization
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in