• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

The “One New Thing” Rule

February 15, 2016 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

FlowChartCloudAdam Grant, in his new book, Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World writes about the necessity of anchoring new ideas in familiar things.

To generate creative ideas, it’s important to start from an unusual place. But to explain those ideas, they have to be connected to something familiar. That’s why so many startups are introducing themselves as the ‘Uber for X’.

It’s why when writers pitch a movie to a producer or studio they often cast it as “this movie-that-you-know meets this other-movie-you-know.” It’s a new movie, so you have to convince a potential audience why they should pay attention. A star you already know. A comic book franchise with familiar characters. A new take on a well-worn story or genre. New is good, but it has to be anchored with something familiar.

Over years of pitching ideas, I’ve developed a version of this that I call the One New Thing Rule. People love the idea of something new, they really do. Two something news they really can’t do. 

A new thing can be seductive, but to consider it requires an adjustment in what you already know. People will make the leap if, as Grant observes, you give them something familiar to contextualize it with. But then stop. Trying to get someone to make a second leap is difficult. In fact, it usually untethers the first new idea from its moorings and you’ve lost the case you might already have won.

 

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: ideas

Comments

  1. william osborne says

    February 16, 2016 at 12:14 am

    Grant’s view of originality is strongly colored by his profession as a business administrator. It is antithetical to the more far-reaching concepts of originality in the arts.

    If you connect your idea to the virus that preceded it, it will be infected as well. The deepest forms of creation break from the past and create new worlds that break from old diseases. Naturally, such events are rare in history. The sociologist and philosopher Jean Baudrillard described them as singularities. Singularities cannot be connected to known concepts because they have no equivalent. They are unique and not exchangeable and thus have a radical edge that defies continuities.

    Singularities challenge the businessman’s world that strives for exchange, productivity, and universals, a world cleansed of all ambiguities that fits within the administrator’s culture of calculation.

    The greatest art, that art that is most creative and original, is unique, uncertain, unpredictable, incalculable, unpresentable, untranslatable, and unproductive. Just about everything a business administrator would abhor. Singularities challenge with radical otherness the modern world that strives toward globalization and a neutralized sameness.

    Great art is a force of defiance. In the eyes of the market it is often monstrous, violent, amorphous, anomalous, and irrational. It can’t be connected to a known idea and thus subjected to the administrator’s soap box merchandizing. As Baudrillard says, this defiance becomes terroristic, “the act that restores an irreducible singularity to the heart of a system of generalized exchange” — a system that all too often serves power and exploitation. And yet the singularity does not challenge the system by violence, but rather by constituting an alternate world. And even if that alternate world is most often exterminated, its concepts remain as an unsurmountable obstacle for the system.

    For Baudrillard, singularities are the antidote to the business administrator’s inauthentic, market-oriented culture of simulation, political economy, globalization, monoculture, and the fraud of media semiosis. So the most deeply creative artists are closer to a terrorist than a business administrator like Grant. And yet the arts world these days is full of the pseudo-artistic, market-oriented visions spawned by the little neoliberal Napoleons of business administration.

    Reply
    • Douglas McLennan says

      February 16, 2016 at 4:39 pm

      William: Thanks for the thoughtful reply. No question that brilliance and originality often (usually?) comes from outside conventional thinking. This is the premise of the disruptive innovation argument, and there’s an industry built around the idea. Incrementalism rarely dazzles. Great art is original.

      But that’s an entirely different point from the one I was trying to make. You’re talking about the generative process of birthing astonishing ideas. The making of the art. I’m not talking about that. I’m talking about after that, how you get currency for those ideas to get support for them. If everyone thinks things work a certain way and you come along and say here’s a completely idea, they need some way to relate to it compared to what they know. They need to know why it should matter to them.

      It’s context and everything comes wrapped in it, no matter who you are. Even you.I don’t think we’re disagreeing on the important points here; and I suspect I am as impatient with small-think incrementalism as you are, and it’s made deadening when art is hostage to “market-oriented visions spawned by the little neoliberal Napoleons of business administration.” I happen to think that art always needs to lead. Sadly, it often doesn’t.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. iKahn Capital says:
    February 22, 2016 at 10:03 am

    […] When coming up with a new business idea, you don’t necessarily need to reinvent the wheel every time. Sometimes you just need to make one change on something that’s already familiar to people, as Douglas McLennan shares in the diacritical bloghere. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,820 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • Douglas McLennan on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “Hi John: Yes – remember over the last decade how Big Data was going to change everything and drive every…” Nov 26, 07:46
  • John McCann on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “I haven’t read this book, yet your review triggered an insight about information shared within organizations and how so much…” Nov 26, 03:57
  • Richard Voorhaar on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “We have reached the point where the average American has no attention span. A 3-4 minute pop tune is all…” Jun 10, 11:22
  • Alan Harrison on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Brilliant piece, Doug. It’s why, in my own columns on LinkedIn and Medium, I may have become more strident recently…” Jun 8, 15:46
  • Tom Corddry on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Slick analogy. Social scientists estimate that 95% of everything we do is basically done out of habit, because it’s an…” Jun 7, 21:04
  • sandi kurtz on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: ““As for seat licenses in the arts – I think it doesn’t work unless demand is so spectacular you can…” Jun 1, 23:19
  • Douglas McLennan on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “I think the membership model is an interesting variant. And the web has gone back and forth on labeling its…” May 31, 07:42
  • Douglas McLennan on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “Thanks Gary. I originally had a section in this podcast discussing why the NYTs’ success hasn’t worked its way down…” May 31, 07:19
  • sandi kurtz on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “A couple of thoughts. The single subscription model, where you sign on to the entire run of the season, curated…” May 30, 23:57
  • Gary P Steuer on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “Loved the podcast Doug. Glad you included newspapers as an example of another business type that has pivoted towards subscriptions.…” May 28, 12:11

Top Posts

  • Is Opera The Real 21st Century Art Form?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • If It Was Just About The Money We'd All Be Making Porn

Recent Posts

  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale November 25, 2022
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World June 26, 2022
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts? June 7, 2022
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts? May 23, 2022
  • This Week’s UnderTow: Why are Police Playing Disney Songs? And Why did this Orchestra Fire its Conductor for… Conducting? April 23, 2022
February 2016
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29  
« Jan   Mar »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?
  • This Week’s UnderTow: Why are Police Playing Disney Songs? And Why did this Orchestra Fire its Conductor for… Conducting?

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in