an blog | AJBlog Central | Contact me | Advertise | Follow me:

Exalting Bruckner at Carnegie Hall

Daniele GattiBruckner’s symphonies are communal rites of spiritual passage. For maximum impact, they require a proper hall and appropriate congregants. In New York City, Lincoln Center’s Geffen Hall – formerly Fisher Hall, and Philharmonic Hall before that — is too dry and plain for Bruckner, and the New York Philharmonic audience that habituates that troubled space is restless and irreverent. I’ve heard Lincoln Center Bruckner conducted by Leonard Bernstein, Christoph Eschenbach, Kurt Masur, Riccardo Muti, and Klaus Tennstedt. None of these experiences stuck except Tennstedt’s Symphony No. 8, a volcano of existential intensity. But lacking the requisite cathedral sonority.

Carnegie Hall, a few blocks downtown, is ideal for Bruckner, and I’ve heard a lot of it there. The conductors were Claudio Abbado, Daniel Barenboim, Herbert Blomstedt, Sergiu Celibidache, Bernard Haitinck, Eugen Jochum, Masur again, Zubin Mehta, Simon Rattle, and Wolfgang Sawallisch. The performances that mattered were Celibidache in No. 4 and Jochum in No. 8. For Celibidache I smoked a joint and sat up close and I knew what I was doing – the symphony played itself in slow motion, with every detail of sonority and balance hypnotically poised. Jochum’s Eighth was, by comparison, warmly human, therapeutically wholesome, rapturously beautiful.

Daniele Gatti, who conducted the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra in Bruckner’s Ninth Symphony a few nights ago at Carnegie Hall, is relatively new to me. I first heard him five seasons ago at the Metropolitan Opera, conducting Parsifal – a performance I reviewed in the Times Literary Supplement and reprinted here. Gatti’s Parsifal was the most memorably conducted opera I’ve encountered in New York in decades. His Carnegie Hall program – which began with excerpts from Parsifal act three – confirmed that first impression.

What distinguishes this conductor, so far as I can tell, is a combination of German and Italian traits that reads like a string of clichés. German is his mastery of structure and – a related attribute – inspired access to the harmonic undertow of tension and release that grounds “Innerlichkeit.” The Italian part is what makes Gatti’s Bruckner sui generis: a Mediterranean investment in legato and sostenuto. Long, sinuous strands of song are wedded to long-range musical architecture. With the Concertgebouw, the weight and suppleness of these sound designs were – even more than at the Met – singularly refulgent. The Gatti Bruckner 9 was distinctive, vast, exalted. A great performance.

So sustained was Gatti’s architectural plan that – unique in my experience of the work – he launched the second movement attacca, without so much as an exhalation of breath following the first movement’s massive coda. The symphony’s ending, often fashioned as a celestial appendix, was in Gatti’s reading not a narrative event, but structural: the beatific halo was not distended.

Bruckner’s Ninth is full of pregnant silences. Gatti’s were in some cases daringly prolonged, but at all times precisely calibrated to weigh a phased accretion or dissipation of pulse and intensity. In these fraught passages, the audience plays a crucial role. At Carnegie, 2,500 listeners sat silently in thrall: a welcome sign of civilization.

I left the hall feeling wonderfully purged. How I wish that New York City had a conductor or orchestra of such exalted caliber.

 

 

 

Comments

  1. The exaltation of music as a spiritual experience attended by congregants in a concert hall seen as a sort of temple, has a problematic history. These ideals grew in tandem with 19th century cultural nationalism which included darker sides such as hyper-nationalism, ethnocentricity, and racial concepts of culture. In the orchestra, it was also manifested through the authoritarian ideals of the era. Conductors and composers became artist-prophets representing the genius seed of the nation state.

    Bruckner’s music suffered especially strongly through this form of misappropriation for a number of reasons, not the least of which is because he is from Linz — for those who know the connection. I think of the famous photo of Hitler standing reverently before a bust of Bruckner in a pseudo temple in Bavaria called Valhalla. What a misfortune for a great composer.

    My wife was in the Munich Philharmonic in the 80s and early 90s when it made regular trips with Celibidache to play in the cathedral in Linz. There was so much holy nationalism in the events that the trips were creepy. It came as no surprise when Abbie was given change in a cafe in Linz that included a Reichsmark. Parts of Austria in those days were still caught in a kind of time warp. Most of that is gone now since those generations have passed away.

    So much damage was done to German culture through association. Anyway, you’re fortunate, and I really mean it, that you don’t have to have such associations with Bruckner’s music.

    • To be more exact, I think the concerts were in St. Florian which where Bruckner worked as an organist. It’s about 10 miles from Linz. Can’t really remember the details. Long ago.

  2. There are two more potentially spectacular Bruckner 9s on the east coast just this month. Gunter Herbig is conducting it in Baltimore this week, and Manfred Honeck in Pittsburgh in three weeks. I hope to make it at least to the Honeck.

an ArtsJournal blog