Something good about classical music

Here's something that seemed obvious, once it occurred to me. But I'd never thought of it before: classical music might be better for the environment than pop, because it (probably) has a lower carbon footprint. Or, more simply, it seems to use less electricity.

This came to me when I was reading British press comment last month on the Live Earth event, comprising concerts in many countries, which were designed to draw attention to global warming. The British press (or at least the Guardian and the Independent, the two papers I read over there) pointed out the implicit irony, which of course is that pop and rock performances are amplified, and thus use electricity in mammoth amounts, which means they themselves contribute (maybe in no small way) to the problem Live Earth was supposed to do something about.

Compare classical music. It's largely unamplified. So an orchestra concert uses less electricity than an arena rock show; a chamber concert uses less than a band playing in a club; and a violinist, practicing all day, uses less electricity than someone playing the electric guitar.

But I did qualify this in my first paragraph ("probably," "seems to"). Why? Because there are still some calculations to be done. I can't do them myself, but I have some idea what they are. Take, for instance, the contrast between an orchestra concert and an arena rock show. I'm sure an orchestra concert uses less electricity. But there are many more orchestra concerts, plus large opera performances, in New York each year than arena rock shows (and on top of that, the classical halls are often used during the day for rehearsals). So maybe the carbon footprint starts to even out. I'm sure that's true in any city with an orchestra that plays year-round (or close to that).

And how about travel? Classical singers, instrumental soloists, and conductors travel constantly. (So do many classical music artist managers, and administrators.) Jet flights have a huge carbon footprint. Pop stars don't travel nearly as much. They go on major tours, but only (as a rule) for a small part of each year. Many of them, maybe most, don't even tour every year.

So the bottom line might be hard to calculate. But here's one way that pop music is ahead of classical music on this issue -- pop music, at least, is aware of it, and a few bands buy carbon offsets whenever they tour. I've asked the American Symphony Orchestra League whether any large American orchestra has ever done that, or thought of doing it, and I'll be curious to know what the answer is.

August 3, 2007 1:31 PM | | Comments (2)

Categories:

2 Comments

a friend and I were talking about that very subject the other day, as we were attending Solarfest (www.solarfest.org) a music/energy/education festival in Vermont that is completely powered by solar and other alternative energy. two days of good music and workshops, and I believe this year, they were putting power back into the grid. cool.

Carbon offsets are bunk. First of all, even if the offestting effect were real, it would not be possible to offset any significant fraction of the greenhouse gases emmitted in the developed world by planting trees, collecting methane, capping-and-trading, etc. It is "working" in the short term because so few people want to offset their carbon.

More to the point, the market is totally unregulated so the actual benefits of carbon offsets are dubious, to put it mildly.

What happened to the discussion about the merits about pop music as music? That could be interesting.

I was expecting a comment like this. BP will be happy to know, I'm sure, that there was a scandal in Britain during July, about large corporations (by coincidence, BP, the oil company, was one of them) that claim carbon offsets they don't deserve.

What to do about climate change is a gigantic issue, to put it mildly. Carbon offsets are at least well-meaning. A journey of a million miles (to revise the old saying upward) starts with whatever steps anyone can manage. The consciousness of climate change is a lot higher now than it was last year, and from what I thought I saw, is notably higher in Britain than in the US. So the issue might not only be whether carbon offsets (by themselves) can reverse global warming. It might also be whether the issue keeps getting raised. From that point of view, while we look for a global solution (which won't be easy at all), it helps for the moment if people in good faith try to do things. And then it's interesting to see who these people might be.

As for the debate on the artistic merit of pop music, bring it on. BP, why don't you start? I'll just remind everyone of the ground rules. If anyone wants to say that pop music isn't worthy artistically, they have to do it with detailed reference to specific songs and albums by pop music artists widely recognized as serious. I'm really not interested in rhetoric, vast generalities, or ungrounded assertions.

Leave a comment

Resources

Age of the French classical audience 
From time to time, people have mentioned in comments here a French government study that supposedly shows that the French classical music audience is very young, with a median age of 38.

I've never been able to find the source for this number. From some of what's been said, I get the idea that it's on a flyer handed out at concerts.

But the French Ministry of Culture tells a different story. You can go here to see the results of their 2008 study of French concert attendance, made available as a PDF file. Or go here if you'd like the numbers in an Excel spreadsheet. (Or here for an overview page, from which you can find out more about the study.)

The numbers are expressed in absolute terms -- the number of people (in hundreds) in various age groups who attended classical concerts in the year the survey covered. And they're broken down by age groups.

From that, it's easy to find what percentage of the French classical music audience falls into the age groups the study specifies:

15-19               4%
20-24               4%
25-34             10%
35-44             18%
45-54             15%
55-64             24%
65 and over    26%
So this median age of 38 seems to be a myth. If we believe the French Ministry of Culture (which has been conducting these surveys for years), fully one-quarter of the French classical music audience is 65 or above. And exactly half of it -- 50% -- is 55 or older.

That means its median age is something around 55. (Since the median would be the point at which half the population in the study is older, and half is younger.)

This should advance the discussion that's erupted here in comments from time to time, about the age of the classical music audience in Europe. Some people think it's lower than it is in the US. But not in France, apparently.

Can anyone point me toward figures for other countries?

(Many thanks to Claudine Verdier- Dievochka for the links to these numbers. Here's her website.)


Age of the audience 
Conventional wisdom: the classical music audience has always been the age it is now. Reality: It used to be younger -- dramatically younger, in fact. Here's some evidence -- primary sources (actual texts of old studies, links to NEA studies) -- plus two of my blog posts on this subject, and some anecdotal data.
more

earlier resources

Things I like

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Sandow published on August 3, 2007 1:31 PM.

Hedgehogs was the previous entry in this blog.

Miniatures? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads


AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.