New music and meerkats
More thoughts about hearing new music, this time from Nathan Botts, a terrific trumpet player who took my Juilliard course on the future of classical music two years ago. Posted of course with his permission:
I've never understood why "new
music" is placed within the same taxonomic grouping as "classical
music." Perhaps they're of the same family, but certainly not the
same genus and heaven forbid the same species. Just because
a whale, meerkat, antelope, and dairy cow are hairy and
breastfeed their young, does that make them all very similar?.
Forgive the biology, but I think it applies. While evolutionally these animals
share a similar genetic ancestry, at this point in time their obvious differences
are far greater than their similarities. So with music we can go to great
efforts to compare the breastfeeding of Boulez to that of Mozart, or the hair of
Schoenburg to that of Haydn, but in the end we're still
trying to compare the bohemith leviathan to a squeaky
prairie rat! (I don't mean these animal designations to in any way reflect
on the music of any of these composers... it's just for poeticism and humor).
Who goes out into nature and sees a herd of cows and thinks about their similarities
to human beings? Who goes to the zoo and sees the meerkats
and thinks about their similarities to the antelope down the way? I certainly
don't. I chuckle when the cows go "moooooo",
and I laugh at the squeaky little meerkats.
So it is with a concert. Who needs
to go to a concert and listen to Boulez and think about all of its wonderful similarities
to Bach? For those of us whose craft it is to know these things certainly,
but how much does an audience really need to know to enjoy the piece? As
a listener I could often care less. I savor the iciness and clarity.
I revel in the complicated simultaneity. But more than anything I relish the
inventive and uncommon sounds. The cow goes "mooooo"
and I laugh, the meerkat squeaks I and chuckle.
As one who performs a large sampling
of music, from a wide variety of places in the world and an even wider variety of
periods in history, I've never understood the purpose our the taxonomic grouping of
"classical" music, except as it applies to the music of composers contemporary
with Haydn and Mozart. But Birtwhistle
on the record shelf next to Beethoven? Cage next
to Chopin? This is all "classical music"? Give me a
$%#$& break!! In masterclasses I've taken to
explaining this away as a corporate record store conspiracy -- the liitle old lady who's buying her record of Tony Bennet doesn't want to have to stand next to that "scary"
looking young man with looking through the selection of Boulez -- so they segregate
everybody into differerent rooms (and search engines...
arghh!).
For my own part I've had some success
going a different route... slightly broader and less discriminatory. With
a bit of laughter, some simple explanation, and a very unassuming air, it's been
my experience that I can perform almost anything for anyone willing to listen, no
matter how wild OR relatively conservative it may be. So what's in the simple
explanation? Usually a very brief bit of history... just as an author or would
do in setting a scene, a bit of benign humor, and then only in the most aurally
difficult cases do I bother to "explain the music." I would reiterate
that I do this no matter how wild OR relatively conservative the piece may be...
yes, even Beethoven gets the brief explanation. I find that with good programming
and common sense, the flow of a recital can continue uninterrupted. And
most importantly, the more recently composed pieces on the program aren't immediately
set up for failure by a sudden condescending explanation.
So like a trip to the zoo, you get some giraffe, some water buffalo, some songbirds, a snake or two, and the ever popular monkeys. Musically, that might mean some Duke Ellington, some Bach, some Corelli, some Haydn, some Carter, some Hoagy Carmichael and even something I may have created (is there a place at the zoo for an animal with the head of a fish and the body of goat?)
(See also my recent "Hearing New Music" post, and the comments on it.)
Categories:
AJ Ads
AJ Arts Blog Ads
Now you can reach the most discerning arts blog readers on the internet. Target individual blogs or topics in the ArtsJournal ad network.
Advertise Here
AJ Blogs
AJBlogCentral | rssspecial
the blog of the National Performing Arts Convention
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
rock culture approximately
Rebuilding Gulf Culture after Katrina
Douglas McLennan's blog
Art from the American Outback
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
No genre is the new genre
John Rockwell on the arts
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude
dance
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...
jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...
media
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Martha Bayles on Film...
classical music
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
publishing
Jerome Weeks on Books
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera
theatre
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Elizabeth Zimmer on time-based art forms
visual
Public Art, Public Space
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog

1 Comments
Leave a comment