I’ve been to two straight conferences, and I’ve got a lot of things to say, but I’m also tired. So, one quick hit about something both refreshing and fun. This is the start of Allan Kozinn’s review of a Turandot performance at the New York City Opera, which appeared in The New York Times on November 3:
Listeners of good will may differ, perhaps violently, about why Puccini’s “Turandot” has tenaciously held its place in the standard repertory. It has an uncommonly dim libretto, even by operatic standards, and a paucity of great arias nestled amid two and a half hours of brass-heavy, faux-exotic scoring and purposeless pageantry.Still, if your idea of a stimulating evening is watching a beefy and clearly none too intelligent prince devoting himself single-mindedly to winning the heart of a creepy harridan – and, O.K., singing “Nessun dorma” along the way – the New York City Opera’s venerable production is back on the boards at the New York State Theater.
Delicious! Doesn’t matter if you agree with Allan or not (and I like the opera, myself). It’s just wonderfully refreshing to see a classical music critic speaking his mind, saying something offbeat and personal, and doing it in plain language.










Recent Comments
Eric Barnhill on The Friday post
If I may post re last Friday's Friday post, readers may be interested in this wonderful take on the Rite...arel on The Friday post
There is nothing new in Mr.Carpenter that Virgil Fox hadn't bettered years earlier. Mr. Fox travelled around with a Rogers...ariel on The Monday post
Gavin Borchert- has come up with an intelligent solution that some how evaded Minkowski who was too busy being a...georgemarrinermaull on A quiet thought
This reply is too long, I know, but it’s important to separate components of the ‘classical music crisis’ so we...Christopher Brooks on A quiet thought
Here is a way that one small orchestra is trying to make itself more viable (I believe Orpheus Chamber Orchestra...