Last week I learned that ticket sales for the Big Five orchestras haven’t declined all that much in the past 10 years (though this year’s, people tell me, are troubling, and I don’t know what the decline might be for all professional orchestras).
But I also learned this stunning, dire fact: In this same period, the cost of selling a ticket rose 40%. Yes, you read that right. It now costs large orchestras 40% more to sell tickets than it did 10 years ago. Why? Because orchestras sell fewer subscriptions, or, to put this more precisely, the percentage of tickets sold in subscriptions has been steadily declining. Years ago, in fact, nearly all tickets were sold in subscriptions, and each year the people who bought those subscriptions all but automatically renewed them. So orchestras hardly had to work to sell tickets; ticket sales just about took care of themselves. But now orchestras have to market subscription sales; they have to invent new, shorter, more varied subscription packages; they have to find ways to market single tickets. All this costs money (for telephone sales, for advertising, for hiring more marketing staff) — money that, years ago, orchestras didn’t have to spend.
Why don’t people subscribe the way they used to? For many reasons, most likely. There’s more to do (more theater companies, more serious movies, more dance companies, more museums, more sports events, DVDs to watch, cooking classes, yoga, exercise, adventure travel, endless things that didn’t compete for everyone’s attention 30 years ago). There’s also, many people think, a cultural shift, a change in the way people plan what they’re going to do: They don’t plan as far in advance as they used to. And finally there’s surely less interest in classical music.
This trend isn’t likely to reverse itself. The cost of selling tickets is likely to increase, which puts orchestras — already having trouble with their finances — in an even worse spot than they’re in now. They’ll have to find still more ways to sell tickets in smaller packages, or even one at a time, and that will very likely cost them even more than they’re spending now.
(Footnote: Larry Tamburri, who runs the Pittsburgh Symphony, would dissent from everything I’ve written here. He thinks subscriptions can still be sold, and, I’d guess, might wonder whether orchestras that have trouble with subscriptions aren’t trying hard enough. We should hope he’s right, because if he is — and if he can show other orchestras how to sell subscriptions — the health of all our orchestras might notably improve.)










Recent Comments
Robert Davidson on The Monday post
I think the idea that "new music" is only experimental, avant-garde or modernist stopped being true about 30 years ago...Scott Harrison on The Monday post
For those interested in judging a bit of "Final Alice" for themselves, you can watch the Acrostic Song from "Final...Karl Maurer on From Lara Downes: New sheriff in town
Thank you for your recognition of the power of artists leveraging volunteers, patrons and technology to present their art in...Louis Torres on The Monday post
Word [Fact] Checker: Interested readers who happen to see this may want to go back to the beginning of our...Herbert Pauls on The Monday post
I wonder if this issue can be clarified a little by bearing in mind that music consumption stats sometimes seem...