• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

How bundling works

April 2, 2013 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

who wants to ski?LOVEtheatre of London will provide me with a special deal: I can get two tickets to Wicked, together with two “free” meals (drinks not included) to be chosen from a short list of participating restaurants. But if they want to attract me to Wicked, why not just lower the ticket price? Why give me the discount through a dinner for two? Delta airlines will save me money on a trip to Puerto Rico, but only if I stay at the Sheraton, and the trip is for three nights. If I buy gasoline from Shell, I can get a discount on a ski lift pass. But what do these things have to do with each other? Why not a deal on an oil change?

These firms are all engaged in a subtle form of price discrimination. The problem they are trying to solve is this: how do we offer a deal for those potential customers who are somewhat on the fence when it comes to buying from us, without lowering the price for those who we know are something of a “sure thing”, and willing to pay a high price? How do we lower the price for one group without lowering it for everybody?

The solution is to offer a deal as part of a bundle that only the on-the-fence customers will find interesting. Consider the dinner + theatre example. I will guess that those with a high reservation price for tickets to the theatre – residents of London who are regular attendees at musicals – are not particularly interested in this selection of restaurants. They will have their own favorite places, and are unlikely to take up this offer. Rather, the package deal will be attractive to those on a stricter budget, perhaps tourists who are unsure of where to eat in London, who will find this a good option. The bundle serves the purpose, then, of offering something attractive to those on the fence, without offering a general price cut that would be taken by everybody.

The other examples follow the same pattern. Delta is offering a deal to the price-conscious vacationer, who won’t mind a stay at the (if I may generalize) safe and predictable Sheraton, while those with more to spend, or business travelers, will not take up the offer, instead just opting for a plane fare. Shell is likewise attracting a particular group of bargain-hunters, without simply lowering prices for gasoline more generally.

The rule of thumb: if your arts organization is looking to offer a package, it need not be something closely related to what your organization does,* what is key is that it be something attractive not to all your potential audience, but just those who are on the margin between attending your show or not.

Footnote: My former professor Preston McAfee provides in his book Competitive Solutions one of my favorite examples, the Detroit clothier who advertised “buy a suit, get a drill”, where suit buyers would indeed get a discount on a purchase of a drill.

Share:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “That too. Politics in art isn’t a matter of having the right position on an issue, but the matter of…” Jun 10, 02:19
  • Michael Rushton on Gut Punch: “I agree. There can be interesting art about politics, but, if I recall correctly as said by Tom Stoppard, the…” Jun 9, 11:27
  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “Naveen Kumar has a very narrow view of what “big questions” are.; but that’s par for the course these days.…” Jun 9, 10:15
  • Michael Rushton on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “Hello Brian, I’m not sure how much I qualify as an intellectual, but this liberal conservative will make the affirmation…” May 25, 15:52
  • Brian Newhouse on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “It seems to me that in order to counter Bourdieu’s arguments, especially as they might apply to government arts policy…” May 25, 15:06
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in