• Home
  • About
    • Performance Monkey
    • David Jays
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Performance Monkey

David Jays on theatre and dance

Animal magic

February 26, 2009 by David Jays 1 Comment

Have you heard the story of Romeo and the gorilla? Christopher Gable was the dancer on whom Kenneth MacMillan created the role of Romeo for the Royal Ballet in 1965. MacMillan planned a harrowing final scene; the distraught hero, he said, should attempt desperately to revive Juliet, but when his efforts failed, she becomes no more than a piece of meat as his hopes fade. Gable was reminded of a gorilla in London Zoo, whose baby had just died. She refused to give the body up to the keepers, but instead dragged it around with her, bumping it over the floor and into the walls. This image of numbed connection became Gable’s touchstone for his own performance.
It’s hard to imagine many similar acts of naturalistic creativity taking place in ballet. I thought of this last week, when preparing a pre-performance event for the BBC Philharmonic. They performed (with scalding energy, under conductor Yutaka Sado) a selection from Prokofiev’s score for Romeo and Juliet (1935), having previously played Tchaikovsky’s luxurious score for The Sleeping Beauty (1890). We discussed how Russian ballet had developed between these two landmark works, and part of the answer was in the dramatic demands.
How does drama meet ballet? There’s more after the click:


Some relatively forgotten figures are an important part of this story. Alexander Gorsky, for example, who left the Maryinksy in St Petersburg in 1901 to work at the Bolshoi, in part because he was fascinated by Stanislavsky’s work at the Moscow Arts Theatre. Gorsky wanted individuals to surge through an ensemble rather than attain a sense of replicant grace. He created a heart-stirring finale for Gudule’s Daughter (his version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame) which sounds close cousin to a Lillian Gish movie. And his Giselle stripped away any Romantic wispiness. He asked his ballerina to mimic real madness and submit to a raving, legs splayed, unpicturesque death. Ballet as we know it cannot bear so much reality.
Another fascinating character is Sergei Radlov, Prokofiev’s collaborator on the scenario for Romeo and Juliet. (Their first version had a happy – or at least, death-defying – ending, which was slapped down by the Soviet powers that be, but resurrected last year by Mark Morris).
Radlov’s was a maverick talent. A student of Meyerhold, he developed a krazy, kinetic komic style of popular theatre. In the brief window of licensed artistic experiment following the 1917 Revolution, he drew on circus skills, silent film comedy and commedia zaniness to fashion partly improvised shows. Even the titles are appetising – who wouldn’t want to see The Corpse’s Bride or The Monkey Informer? And to see them, moreover, on a stage which was divided into nine separate boxes so that scenes could be simultaneously performed or move from one to the other with the speed of a cinematic cross-cut.
Radlov was nonetheless strictured for devising a free-flowing satire untethered to ideological correctness. He tried to behave, producing a play by Gorky about a buck-passing bureaucrat who is still reluctant to actually do anything when the ceiling falls in on him. But he then began exploring classic drama – initially comic texts by Moliere, and then Shakespeare’s tragedies. His 1935 King Lear for Moscow’s pioneering Yiddish Theatre was considered a triumph of plangent constructivism – but the first wave of Stalinist purges pushed him from his post in Leningrad, and for the next 20 years he worked outside Russia’s major cities. Nonetheless, he sounds an extraordinary director, and some of his leaps of creative energy must have influenced Prokofiev’s score, which is heartfelt one minute, foreboding the next, often fleetly, unexpectedly sarcastic.
The Kirov’s first Juliet, Galina Ulanova, was also a Stanislavsky disciple, and brought that commitment to her acting as well as her dancing. But I realise I don’t know much about how today’s dancers learn to act. Does it represent a significant part of the ballet school syllabus? Do dancers develop what they need for a particular production? If anyone could enlighten me, I’d be grateful. And in the meantime – what is the greatest acting performance you have seen at the ballet?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Tobi Tobias says

    February 27, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    In answer to your closing question: Nora Kaye’s, in Antony Tudor’s ballets, with American Ballet Theatre. tt

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

David Jays

I am a writer and critic on performance, books and film and currently write for, among others, the Sunday Times and the Guardian. I edit Dance Gazette, the magazine of the Royal Academy of Dance. I’m also a lifelong Londoner: it’s the perfect city for connecting to art forms that both look back and spring forward. [Read More]

Performance Monkey

This is what theatre and dance audiences do: we sit in the dark, watching performances. And then, if it seems worth it, we think about what we've seen, and how it made us feel. The blog should be a conversation, so please comment on the posts and add your thoughts. You know what I've always … [Read More...]

@mrdavidjays

Tweets by @mrdavidjays

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Veronica Horwell on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Know what you mean about the underpowered pre-17late90s shoulder: a bottle slope approach to body outline — the Hamilton coats…” Jul 8, 13:41
  • Sarah Lenton on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Blimey. A tour de force! Hugely enjoyable. Slight demur on whether a period raised fist would have produced a scrunched…” Jul 7, 21:44
  • william osborne on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “An article that analyzes the serious problems with “Hamilton” by Ed Morales, a journalist and lecturer at Columbia University’s Center…” Jul 7, 20:20
  • william osborne on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Indeed, in the late 18th century people learned that properly toned-down attire was important for slave owners proclaiming democracy. And…” Jul 7, 19:28
  • David Jays on Bringing Up Baby | Lockdown Theatre Club 16: “Hello Ana, and thanks so much for this. Joining in is, I hope, easy: we all find the film on…” Jul 3, 16:02
February 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
« Jan   Mar »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17
  • Bringing Up Baby | Lockdown Theatre Club 16
  • The Go-Between | Lockdown Theatre Club 14
  • Girlhood | Lockdown Theatre Club 13
  • All That Jazz | Lockdown Theatre Club 12

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in