We’re now focused on “doping tests” to determine if artists have cheated. Rather than pee in a bottle, however, we’re depending on AI detector tools and documentary proof of human creation. Did the Foundation double down to ask what’s the best writing? No. They cared more about how it was made. Perhaps that’s important. Of course it is. But, in a way, it’s now an impossible question. Moreover, it may ultimately be the wrong question.
Douglas McLennan's blog
An ArtsJournal Blog
Recent Posts
- AJ Chronicles: It’s Getting Expensive to Prove You’re a Human Artist
- AJ Chronicles: There’s no Shortage of Art. We Ran Out of Ways to Find It.
- AJ Chronicles: A New Policy to Eliminate Arguments for the Arts
- Is Trump’s Wreckage of the Kennedy Center an Opportunity for Something Better?
- AJ Chronicles: Google Just Changed the way We’re Going to Find Culture