• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?

October 23, 2018 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

The tide has turned on the tech revolution. Over the past year the breathless articles that used to accompany new tech innovations have dried up, replaced with dystopian concerns about the Dark Web, privacy, hacking, fake news, and the deadening and manipulative effects of social media addiction.

Tech was going to disrupt everything:

Even after the word lost its meaning from overuse, it still suffused our understanding of why the ground beneath our feet felt so shaky. They tried to freak us out and we believed them. Why wouldn’t we? Their products were dazzling, sci-fi magic come to life. They transformed our days, our hours, our interior life. Fear of being stranded on “the wrong side,” in turn, primed us to look to these world-beating companies to understand what comes next.

It is only now, a decade after the financial crisis, that the American public seems to appreciate that what we thought was disruption worked more like extraction—of our data, our attention, our time, our creativity, our content, our DNA, our homes, our cities, our relationships. The tech visionaries’ predictions did not usher us into the future, but rather a future where they are kings.

You could see it coming. Lonely voices in the beginning – Evgeny Morozov, Jaron Lanier, then Nicholas Carr,  Franklin Foer and others. Now it’s become an industry.

Teens are not getting on Facebook, for the first time social media use is flattening or declining, and 42 percent of Facebook users said they took a break from the platform at least for a while in the past year. Pew reports that a growing number of those surveyed say they wouldn’t find it hard to give up social media.

We all got addicted to free services on the web, not realizing that there wasn’t anything free about them, that our behavior, the data we generated while using the services, was actually the ultimate product. It’s not actually as diabolical as it seems. We’ve watched “free” TV and subsidized newspapers for years. But tech just found a more sophisticated way of being able to take advantage of it. DNA testing services and genealogy sites that are cheap to use aren’t actually making a living off your purchases of their services; they’re collecting your data and selling databases to their true clients.

Tech business models fooled us into thinking we were the client, when in fact we were the product.

So what to do about it? Look at the products you use and decide whether you care or not. Social media has changed how we think about privacy, and you might not care. On the other hand, if you’ve just had your credit cards exposed in a hack or you’re the victim of identity theft or you’re depressed because social media distraction has dulled your senses, you might.

And meanwhile, on a bigger scale, the everything-wants-to-be-free ethos has ruined a lot of business models that support culture. WIth a new skepticism about tech disruption, we’re starting to see some industries – like music and publishing  and newspapers – start to figure out how to get past this. But it’s going to take a while.

Image: Pixabay

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: arts & tech

Comments

  1. Jam says

    October 23, 2018 at 1:18 pm

    I understand that Kindles, Kobos and Nooks are also dropping off with many returning to real tangible books, to read, mark up, share, etc.
    Humans love new toys… in the 40s/50/s it was time saving devices that promised us untold free time. This is another round for shiny things that promise everything but don’t deliver. We will continue to chase this tail…. because it’s interesting and fun. It’s not just America … it’s humanity. Social Media is anything but.

    Reply
  2. CoolWriter says

    January 2, 2019 at 4:23 am

    Netflix is ​​a good example of how rapidly changing technologies can strike even a very advanced business project, tightly tied to these very high technologies. Netflix, since its inception in 1997, has been developing technologies for streaming video broadcasting, and since 1999, has had its own Internet service for selling streaming multimedia content using the Video on Demand scheme, it has made a fatal mistake, concentrating its main efforts on DVD rental at a time when other technologies replaced Netflix DVDs almost collapsed. This will show how important it is to keep up with the times, and what they are doing now is a pathetic attempt to stop or delay the development so that they don’t go bankrupt themselves

    Reply
  3. Mark says

    March 19, 2023 at 1:15 pm

    Thank you

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Creativity Versus Skills

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
October 2018
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jul   Dec »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in