• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Culture-crashing – Is The Internet Killing Our Creative Class?

January 16, 2015 by Douglas McLennan 6 Comments

jpegScott Timberg, an arts journalist and author of the CultureCrash blog on ArtsJournal, has a new book out called… Culture Crash. It’s Scott’s attempt to look at how the digital revolution has impacted artists. The tagline of the book – “The Killing of the Creative Class” – gives you an idea of what he thinks has happened.

His premise is that artists are having a more and more difficult time making a living from their work. Ultimately, he thinks, without viable ways of supporting themselves, artists will top making art and do other things. We, as a society will be impoverished by this. We sat down to talk about the book last month in LA. Have a listen:

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: arts & tech, culture business models

Comments

  1. Saul says

    January 18, 2015 at 3:12 pm

    I am so glad he wrote this book. I have been living this nightmare since 1984. He seems to have nailed the roots of the crisis on the head. The negative review in Slate and the nasty comments seem to show that we have now raised a society of younger people who just don’t care. They are ignorant and are content with that. Nourished by a steady stream pop-culture junk of lower and lower quality, where the Simpsons reign supreme, with minds controlled by Apple and other digital services providers, by devices, they are incapable of pure, independent thought, and insensitive to art. We are entering a new Dark Ages, having been born to the end of what will be seen as a second Renaissance, where the tender strands of culture will only survive in the hands and minds of a view, and among the few wealthy who have any culture.

    Reply
    • Saul says

      January 18, 2015 at 3:17 pm

      What is truly sad, is that without a fundamental change in our society’s values, without government regulation of the media, without government stipends, or major changes in the IRS, it will continue to get worse and worse. It would take massive amounts of money to provide an adequate supply of housing, of a minimal income to support artistic professionals to continue their work. It would take an abandonment of capitalism. We are not Europe, and it won’t happen. Europe may hopefully continue to support its culture. We will continue to dominate the world with pop-culture crap. The fact is, you cannot reach the level of artistry without ample time to study and grow, which means having housing, health insurance, and enough to eat and buy clothing. The situation is not helped by those trendseekers who seek to destroy the definitions of art and bring down its standards. If you can’t define art by its high level of craftsmanship and technique, if it is just an idea anyone can make or copy, if it is just a trend, if art can be show-and-tell/school project “installations,” then anyone can “be” an artist, and that makes it impossible to support actual artists, because their recognition, their definition has been co-opted by charlatans.

      Reply
      • w says

        January 19, 2015 at 2:36 am

        I very much enjoyed your articulate comments. My only objection would be to the fatalistic idea that America can’t change, that it can’t someday have a public system of arts funding like the Europeans. If one had said in 1950 we would someday in the not so distant future have a black President, they might have thought you were crazy. We can change, even if slowly.

        Reply
  2. Susan Santiago says

    January 26, 2015 at 10:40 am

    I haven’t read the book (I just ordered it) but Timberg is spot on! I use to live in San Francisco and today I’m located on the north side of the Golden Gate Bridge. Until the late 1990’s, San Francisco use to be one of the most beautiful and creative, artistic cites in the world. Today, it still has its beauty, but has lost its creativity and, thus, its soul. It is now all form and no content. For one who has lived in, as well as known, San Francisco, its creative ambiance is gone and I can honestly say I am mourning this loss.. San Francisco is now an arena for the wealthy, interlaced with techie hysteria…so sad.

    Reply
  3. sjc says

    March 12, 2015 at 10:45 am

    He’s a smart and important writer. Glad he’s bringing to light how deep seated this problem really is. Eye opening.

    Reply
  4. CultureHunter says

    January 24, 2016 at 9:54 pm

    I haven’t read the book, but listened to the podcast. On the point of arts journalism, I do believe new digital technologies are allowing for greater diversity. In the past, being a music journalist/critic would require you to volunteer or write things for free for a certain period of time (which would only be possible for a certain class of people). Now, you can develop these skills while in other work. A less risky proposition.

    I have started an arts blog http://culturehunterblog.org while in work as a Museum Director. My hope is to transition into arts journalism in the future. This wouldn’t have been possible 10 years ago. However, I do take the author’s point – by the time I build up the skills/reputation to make the transition, will there be any paying jobs in the field?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?
  • Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
January 2015
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan   Feb »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in