• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Artists Erased From The Web And Our Growing Problem With Facts

September 4, 2016 by Douglas McLennan 1 Comment

social-1157114_1280
Artist and author Dennis Cooper got his blog back this week. Google had suddenly removed the 14-year-old blog a few months ago without warning and had refused to answer Cooper’s repeated attempts to find out why.

After the takedown got attention “from international media outlets, a statement of support from PEN America and a petition to recover the blog,” Google finally responded to Cooper’s lawyers and agreed to give him his blog database. Why had the company removed it?

According to Cooper, someone had reported a post on DC’s Blog, which was hosted on the Google-owned Blogspot, from 10 years ago as they felt it constituted child abuse images, and Google immediately deactivated his account.

As I wrote recently, last year YouTube (owned by Google) determined that streams of live concerts from the Ojai Music Festival were violating copyright and posted ads on the streams and threatened a takedown, even though the festival was broadcasting live performances and not the recordings that Google said whose copyrights were being violated.

And last year New York Magazine critic Jerry Saltz was banned by Facebook for a time for posting images that Facebook took issue with.

There are dozens of stories about artists suddenly finding themselves cut off when Facebook or Google decide their work violates terms of service.

Okay, so a few artists are inconvenienced because their work is controversial. But don’t Facebook and Google need to have some lines of unacceptability? Child porn? ISIS? Twitter recently took down 125,000 accounts it said were promoting terrorism.

Who’s Deciding What We See?

The problem is that the internet giants have consolidated into just a few massive platforms that have essentially become the web. Facebook has become the place from which hundreds of millions of people get their news, and its invisible algorithms determine who sees what. The algorithms are not passive or neutral. A change in the company’s algorithm earlier this year resulted in huge declines in traffic to traditional news sites. More seriously, if you inadvertently run afoul of the company’s mechanisms, you lose the privilege of access altogether. Get erased from Google and you’re suddenly invisible to the world, cut off from the web altogether.

Showing up is power. Wars are fought over the ability to show up, and societies are built on access to the common infrastructure essential to make them function. Our road system is public and its “terms of use” are transparent. We try not to let private companies control or enforce access. As our world has become more virtual, the internet has – as much or even perhaps more so than any traditional roadway – become the mechanism by which we show up. It has become part of the common infrastructure essential for the functioning of society.

And yet these platforms are controlled by private companies with their own opaque and absolute rules and no process of appeal. In 2015 the US Department of Justice opposed the merger of Time Warner and Comcast, arguing that it would reduce competition in the cable industry. Online, there is no equivalent “merger” to be blocked. Google and Facebook have already consolidated the space based on their success.

The question is: are we comfortable letting shareholder-driven companies – any private company – have absolute control over infrastructure that is increasingly essential for the functioning of civil society? Deciding who is visible and who is not? What is acceptable to say and what is not? Who has access and who doesn’t?

A Currency Of Information

One doesn’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to be concerned about how information spreads. Many political observers believe that facts don’t seem to matter in our current political climate. Au contraire. Facts matter more than they ever have, and everyone’s got their own. It’s actually not that they don’t matter – it’s that consensus on facts seems to have evanesced, leaving people to embrace truths in bubble universes that increasingly self-reinforce, validate and corroborate themselves.

These bubbles aren’t the result of gullible stupid people suddenly finding one another and getting together. They’re the result of algorithms that inflate versions of the world based on a currency not of facts or truth or importance but of raw attention. That which gets more attention is not only more valuable than that which doesn’t, it becomes, by virtue of the size of that attention a de facto truth, a fact.

Was it ever thus. Yellow journalism anyone? The media gatekeepers of yore were far from perfect and their views of the world were narrow and establishment-centric. But in the pre-Facebook world yellow journalism would eventually run into the buzz-saw of fact. In the social media era there is no longer one buzz-saw, every bubble has its own. And no newspapers, magazines, TV network or number of Politifacts, Snopes or FactCheck.orgs has the ability to arbitrate with authority. Indeed, these fact-checkers tend to merely reinforce our information bubbles.

Are these bubbles not a consequence of letting a few giant players establish a currency standard that determines the relative values of information and debate? These companies may or may not have political agendas, but they do have biases. And they have self-interests, many of which are not transparent, and some of which might not be in the public interest.

So an artist loses his blog suddenly and without warning. And when Google finally does give Dennis Cooper back the contents which he created, which he thought he owned, it faces no accountability or consequence. And that’s a problem which points to a much bigger problem. Bad enough that Google can erase an artist like Dennis Cooper. More insidious that Facebook et al have – without accountability – created a de facto currency of information and hierarchy that encourages and rewards mobs. Now the mobs are getting restless.

Image: Pixabay

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: arts & tech, arts and politics, audience

Comments

  1. Liliana Couto says

    September 5, 2016 at 5:57 am

    I have problems with youtube because of the music of a choreography. They said that music is protected by interpret right laws. But it is Bach!!! dead a long time ago.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,820 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • Douglas McLennan on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “Hi John: Yes – remember over the last decade how Big Data was going to change everything and drive every…” Nov 26, 07:46
  • John McCann on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “I haven’t read this book, yet your review triggered an insight about information shared within organizations and how so much…” Nov 26, 03:57
  • Richard Voorhaar on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “We have reached the point where the average American has no attention span. A 3-4 minute pop tune is all…” Jun 10, 11:22
  • Alan Harrison on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Brilliant piece, Doug. It’s why, in my own columns on LinkedIn and Medium, I may have become more strident recently…” Jun 8, 15:46
  • Tom Corddry on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Slick analogy. Social scientists estimate that 95% of everything we do is basically done out of habit, because it’s an…” Jun 7, 21:04
  • sandi kurtz on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: ““As for seat licenses in the arts – I think it doesn’t work unless demand is so spectacular you can…” Jun 1, 23:19
  • Douglas McLennan on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “I think the membership model is an interesting variant. And the web has gone back and forth on labeling its…” May 31, 07:42
  • Douglas McLennan on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “Thanks Gary. I originally had a section in this podcast discussing why the NYTs’ success hasn’t worked its way down…” May 31, 07:19
  • sandi kurtz on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “A couple of thoughts. The single subscription model, where you sign on to the entire run of the season, curated…” May 30, 23:57
  • Gary P Steuer on The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?: “Loved the podcast Doug. Glad you included newspapers as an example of another business type that has pivoted towards subscriptions.…” May 28, 12:11

Top Posts

  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Some Of Our Orchestras Seem To Be Thriving - Is This A New Trend?
  • Is Perfection Killing Classical Music?

Recent Posts

  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale November 25, 2022
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World June 26, 2022
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts? June 7, 2022
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts? May 23, 2022
  • This Week’s UnderTow: Why are Police Playing Disney Songs? And Why did this Orchestra Fire its Conductor for… Conducting? April 23, 2022
September 2016
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?
  • This Week’s UnderTow: Why are Police Playing Disney Songs? And Why did this Orchestra Fire its Conductor for… Conducting?

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in