• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Why Aren’t We Driving Self-Driving Cars Yet? It’s All About The Culture

August 23, 2016 by Douglas McLennan 1 Comment

carfreedomDriverless cars are here and they work and by all accounts they make driving safer than when humans are piloting. So why aren’t they already in showrooms?

Not so fast. It’s not just about whether they can be made and work and are safe. It’s about a cultural shift that will have to take place before they are successfully sold.

Like anything that’s a significant part of our lives, there’s a culture around driving that isn’t just about whether it works or not. Apple watches work, but they’re hardly a must-have item, even for techies. Before driverless cars become ubiquitous, we’re going to have to change how we think about:

  1. Safety: It’s not just whether the cars are safe – tests say they are. But we’ll have to readjust our expectations of safety. Now when we get into an accident it’s either your fault or my fault. Even if accident rates are dramatically lower, who gets the blame when the inevitable injury or death happens? And let’s not even talk about the rethink of liability, insurance and premiums. Our expectations about safety are a cultural thing.
  2. Independence: Car culture is a celebration of our independence, our ability to go anywhere and choose how and in what manner we get there. With a car doing the driving, that thrill of independence and freedom will be diminished for some.  Look at car ads and how they equate driving with freedom. How will manufacturers make self-driving cars sexy? On the other hand, for people who for whatever reason can’t drive – older or infirmed, for example – might see the driverless car as new independence.
  3. Transportation and Cities: Our traffic rules are written for cars with drivers. Driverless cars will change the ways cars behave and how they’re used. Uber wants self-driving cars for obvious reasons. If car transportation is on-demand, maybe fewer people will want to own cars. Cities might find the cars compete with public buses and subways and have to rethink public transportation and whether to invest in transit projects. Our need for parking might be drastically reduced. And we might be able to reduce the footprint of roads and parking lots in our cities.

Some of these changes in culture will be incremental and not obvious until they happen. Others – like how we feel about cars – will have to happen sooner.

So the challenge for Google and other driverless car companies isn’t just to build a vehicle that works, it’s to change the way we think about the culture of cars – safety and independence and transportation. And that’s not just a marketing issue, it’s a significant shift in our culture.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: arts & tech

Comments

  1. justin says

    September 13, 2016 at 8:38 am

    To me this whole thing doesn’t work unless ALL cars are driverless. I wouldn’t want to be in a autonomous car surrounded by people who can’t drive lol. I do like what Uber and Volvo did though I think their headed in the right direction.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
August 2016
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jul   Sep »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in