• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Playing For The Screens – Is Our Obsession With Video Changing The Live Arts Experience?

January 20, 2016 by Douglas McLennan 4 Comments

Judi-Dench-Paulina-and-Kenneth-Branagh-Leontes-in-The-Winters-Tale-CREDIT-Johan-Persson-700x455One weekend last November, the biggest box-office at movie theatres throughout the UK wasn’t for the latest Hollywood blockbuster (the latest “Hunger Games” movie opened that Friday). It was for a live broadcast of  Kenneth Branagh’s production of  “The Winter’s Tale” which was streamed live to 520 theatres in the UK and 100 more internationally on November 26. Starring Branagh and Judi Dench, it sold more than £1.1 million in tickets.

More people saw that performance than will fit into the National Theatre in a year of performances.

In December, a live theatrical performance of The Wiz was a ratings hit on NBC, seen by 11.5 million viewers. Compare this to the record 13 million who went to a year’s worth of all of Broadway’s shows in 2015.

Then of course there’s the Metropolitan Opera, which pumps its theatre-casts out to movie theatres around the world in 60+ countries. The remote Met audience is vastly larger than the one that comes to Lincoln Center (this has long been the case for the Met when you factor in its weekly radio broadcasts, though I’d argue the movie theatre experience is an entirely different animal).

But this isn’t a post about the relative merits of the video/movie versus live theatre. Nor am I suggesting that the arts ought to focus all their energy on getting their work onto the screen.

Still.

The Medium Is The Magic

Most people’s primary relationship with artists now is through screens or speakers. Self-evidently, the screen/speaker medium is different from the live experience. Understanding this is what made the Met Opera movie theatre project so much better than a Live from Lincoln Center broadcast. The movie theatre streams speak the language of the screen; by comparison, Live from Lincoln Center imagined its broadcasts as facsimile of the live theatre experience.

Inevitably, the language of the screen will increasingly change how artists will think about the live theatrical experience.

Results Dance Map LA

And there’s this. One of the questions we asked Los Angeles dancers in the DanceMapLA survey I wrote about yesterday was how much video of dance they watched. Thirty-eight percent reported they watched dance videos every day. Seventy percent said they watched at least once a week.

We also asked them how often they went to live performances of dance. Less than eight percent said they went even once a month! These are dance people in the business of making dance, and even they are not going to see their colleagues’ work in person.

Results Dance Map LA live

But put aside that for a moment.

If you buy the idea that an artist’s aesthetic is influenced by the work they see, what these answers suggest is that the typical LA dancer finds dance on a screen at least as compelling as the live experience. Over time, this suggests that their work will be more influenced by the language of the screen rather than the live theatre version. How will that change what they might make for a live theatre audience?

And if you’re an artist, how are you going to reconcile an increasingly screen-driven audience used to looking at performance on a screen when it comes into a live space?

I still maintain that the perfection of audio recording in classical music in the 60s, 70s and 80s’ changed expectations of audiences in the concert hall for note-perfect performances. Over time, the recording fetish of “perfection” bred a sterility that damaged the spontaneous connection between artist and listener in the hall. If artists more and more start playing for the screens, how will that change what happens to the live in-the-space performance?

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: audience, audience experience, changing culture

Comments

  1. MWnyc says

    January 20, 2016 at 9:43 pm

    “These are dance people in the business of making dance, and even they are not going to see their colleagues’ work in person.”

    That makes sense: as we see from the study, they can’t afford the tickets. And their colleagues need every possible dollar of box-office revenue and can’t afford to dish out comps to all their fellow dancers.

    Reply
    • Kevin M says

      January 23, 2016 at 11:36 am

      Precisely my thoughts. The financial “necessities” of the performing arts are erecting ever higher barriers to the audiences that support them. I fear we are in a fiscal death spiral which, sadly, paid screen views may be the only hope.

      Reply
  2. board member says

    January 22, 2016 at 6:31 am

    More important: Virtual reality technology will create a 3-dimensional experience much richer than dance on a screen. 2-D screens are an intermediary step to 3-D (eg, Pina) and VR. For good and ill, the dance world is terribly conservative and, therefore, will be led to adopt new technology by the forces of popular entertainment.

    Reply
  3. Michael McGuigan says

    January 25, 2016 at 12:52 pm

    It’s not just the cost of tickets (which is a big factor) that has dancers – and live-actors, I’m sure – watching their art on the screen more often than live. It’s a question of time as well. I am an actor/director/manager of a NY non-profit theatre company, and many evenings and weekends are in rehearsals or, more often, devoted to grant and proposal writing. It is just so much easier these days to see what is happening and what is inspiring via a google search. But don’t kid yourself, artists are very very aware that it is not a substitute for the real thing. It’s flat, even in 3-D.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,823 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • Douglas McLennan on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “True – but the Swiftie phenomenon demonstrates how deeply people want to engage and that they’re willing to pay dearly…” Jul 24, 21:25
  • Tom Corddry on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “An additional data point: Taylor Swift drew 144,000+ to her two Seattle concerts, at an average ticket price of $123.…” Jul 24, 15:34
  • Steven Lavine on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “Terrific account. Like so many of our social media Augmented crises, it’s hard to see a way forward.” Jul 24, 13:52
  • Howard Mandel on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “At least it’s clear the “ long-tail” argument was a canard.” Jul 24, 06:10
  • Sam Hodak on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “So what you’re telling me is… make a VR experience” May 12, 00:03
  • Mark on What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?: “Thank you” Mar 19, 13:15
  • Douglas McLennan on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “Hi John: Yes – remember over the last decade how Big Data was going to change everything and drive every…” Nov 26, 07:46
  • John McCann on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “I haven’t read this book, yet your review triggered an insight about information shared within organizations and how so much…” Nov 26, 03:57
  • Richard Voorhaar on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “We have reached the point where the average American has no attention span. A 3-4 minute pop tune is all…” Jun 10, 11:22
  • Alan Harrison on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Brilliant piece, Doug. It’s why, in my own columns on LinkedIn and Medium, I may have become more strident recently…” Jun 8, 15:46

Top Posts

  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • Do Artists Have A Vision For The Future?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?
  • This Week's Top AJ Stories: Does Pittsburgh Symphony Strike Settlement Solve Anything? Should Arts Funding Be Dependent On Encouraging Bad Behavior?

Recent Posts

  • Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance July 23, 2023
  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale November 25, 2022
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World June 26, 2022
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts? June 7, 2022
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts? May 23, 2022
January 2016
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec   Feb »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance
  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?
  • The UnderTow: Subscriptions are the New Business Model of Choice. So Why are Subscriptions Failing in the Arts?

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in