• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Is Earning Making Money The New Audience-Building Strategy?

January 4, 2016 by Douglas McLennan 1 Comment

MakingaLivingMakingMusic 6.25.13 Final (hi res)Maybe it’s obvious, but in the for-profit world, making money is the point; profit defines success. In the non-profit world, the relationship between profit and success is more complicated. “Profit” (or balancing the books) is regarded as a hill to be climbed over rather than the objective.

In the hyper-connected world of social media, profit is no longer simply about selling more product. More than ever consumers are about relationships – the kinds of relationships that non-profits have worked on for years. It used to be that a company’s story was essential to those consumer relationships; now it’s the stories of the community around the company that are increasingly important. Companies like Marriott have become sophisticated storytellers and content producers because of their need to attract audiences who increasingly define themselves by the stories they share. Through those stories, audiences become invested in the success of the community around the companies. Sound familiar?

Crowdfunding: Raising Money Or Building Audience?

Crowdfunding began as a way to raise money to fund products; it’s evolved into a way to create social networks around ideas that can be shared and invested in, populated by customers who have a stake in the success of that community.

Maybe this is just the next evolution in clever marketing, but I wonder if it’s more than that. Investors are more loyal than traditional customers, and communities of investors are more focused on the success of their community than unconnected consumers are. Marketing’s sweet spot has always been the emotional tug – buy our product and you will feel glamorous. Desireable. Smart. Funny. Hip. In a hyper-connected world, companies now want you to feel about them the way you do about your favorite sports team. Root for them. Root for each other. Do what you can do to help. Buy more stuff.

The arts have long depended on patrons to feel like they’re part of a community. But how many arts organizations make their communities feel like investors? Plenty of artists have used crowdfunding to raise money for projects. But those who are really good at it use it not just to raise money but to motivate an audience.

A recent study found that musicians earn money from 45 revenue streams, many of them not directly involved with the act of playing music itself. Diversifying income sources is essential these days as the music business whipsaws between business models.

One could think of those revenue streams simply as the way you make money. You could think of them as desperate strategies to continue to make income as compensation for playing and recording music has collapsed. Or you can think of them as opportunities for audiences to become investors. Investing with money, sure, but also audience investing in your success. Wearing your T-shirt, talking you up, sharing your music, your pictures, motivating others to pay attention.

These days people define themselves through what they choose to share. If they’re particularly motivated they’ll be creative in how they share their love. That in turn motivates others and the cycle repeats. Why would anyone spend hours making a video or writing a blog post promoting someone who isn’t paying them? Because they’ve gone from being consumers to being investors. Investing in you is investing in their own identity.

The idea is simple, really. Investors are worth much more than customers. Customers consume, then move on; investors take a personal stake in your being successful (we call them fans). People who make no investment in consuming your work are only fickle customers. People who are invested in you are worth much more than any money they might throw your way. I’m not sure there’s anything new in this – there have always been fans and artists have always been dependant on those fans to promote them. But today fans can have as much if not more impact in building an audience around you as traditional media. This guy can get 7 million subscribers to his YouTube channel, 100s of millions of views of his videos and enough fans that he writes a book and makes a movie? Seriously. You can be appalled, or you can try to figure out how he did it.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: audience, audience experience

Comments

  1. Roger Butler says

    May 29, 2016 at 10:45 pm

    Crowdfunding has completely changed it and it has become a way to market your idea. The startups raising funds from crowdfunding platform are not only making money but also they get a preferable amount of marketing for their idea.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?
  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
January 2016
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec   Feb »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in