• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Half-Way Strategies That Appeal To No One

April 6, 2009 by Douglas McLennan 1 Comment

The hottest show on cable news right now is Glenn Beck’s program, which debuted on Fox News a few months ago. If you haven’t seen Stephen Colbert’s send-up of him, check this out:

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
The 10.31 Project
comedycentral.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

Beck is a hysteric, but he’s getting huge ratings. He’s actually beating every other cable news show except the long-established Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly. This after only a few months on the air:

newsratings.JPG

CNN has slipped into third place behind Fox and MSNBC.

Lessons? The obvious: Whackadoodle sells. Outrageousness sells. Dogma sells. Entertainment sells. But I wonder if there’s something else. It’s been a long time since cable news has been about real news. It’s become a kind of sprawling news-o-tainment “reality” show in which the goal is to stir people up rather than inform them.

This isn’t an argument against such shows. If people want to watch them, fine. Rather, I want to focus on CNN. CNN was the first cable news channel and it started out focusing on traditional news. Then Fox News launched and had success with its news-o-tainment format. CNN responded by trying to throw in a bit more pizzazz, Not, unfortunately for CNN, as entertainingly as Fox, and its ratings have been slipping ever since.

So CNN is a mess. Almost unwatchable as a purely news channel (with Wolf Blitzer’s constant hyping of “the best political team on television”) and a steady diet of inanities and blow-dried dumb anchors, it also doesn’t deliver much as entertainment. It can’t match Fox at stirring up the outrage.

CNN’s predicament reminds me of that of many local newspapers. Newspapers perceived that the serious stuff didn’t have a big enough audience so they tried to pop-culture-up and make the stories, ideas and language simple. Fox works because it blatantly hammers out its agendas while CNN’s agendas are watered down out of some vestigial sense of traditional journalism. CNN doesn’t play Fox’s game very well – instead it half-plays the Fox game and consequently doesn’t do either news or news-o-tainment very well. There’s a parallel for newspapers. Rather than attract a hipper younger audience, they alienated their core readers and failed to get the kids as well.

In our increasingly nichefying world, using mass-culture strategies to get bigger audiences works against you. A proliferation of sources means that people can be pickier to get exactly what they want, and general bland multi-purpose content has less and less appeal. A lesson for anyone competing for an audience these days.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Adam Huttler says

    April 7, 2009 at 6:23 am

    Somewhat ironically, the case can be made that News Corp, Fox’s parent, is replaying CNN’s error with the Wall Street Journal. Murdoch’s misguided attempt to turn WSJ into a general interest publication that competes with the NY Times (WSJ Sports??) is a really dubious strategy. WSJ has historically enjoyed an extremely entrenched spot in a very valuable niche. If I were the Financial Times I’d see this as an amazing opportunity to move in and grab a lot of market share.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • Killing NEA, NEH And PBS Is Just Collateral Damage In The Commodification Of American Values

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
April 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in