• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

What if an Arts Organization was a MOOC?

March 24, 2013 by Douglas McLennan 4 Comments

KeynoteScreenSnapz026That’s “Massive Open Online Course” and they’re everywhere right now. Some of the most prestigious universities are creating courses online and attracting tens of thousands of students. Among them is Curtis, the music school in Philadelphia, which became the first big music conservatory to sign up with Coursera.

We live in a time in which we’re overwhelmed with information, with choices. People lament the shortening of attention spans and we’re bombarded with ever-shorter messages and snippets of information. But an interesting thing has begun to happen. Perhaps because the short message has become so ubiquitous, so disposable, we’re seeing a rebirth in interest in long-form publications and endeavors that take an investment of time.

Now that we can access “everything” and everything is clamoring for our attention, we have become more discerning, and if we choose to invest our attention in something, we want it to pay off, to be able to dive into it. Increasingly, that seems not to be the quick hit; it’s those things that ask something of us, that require us to put something into them to get the payoff.

There’s probably no such thing as a casual Yankee fan. Yankee fans pride themselves on what they know, what they think, and how they express it. There is nothing like – and I say this in an admiring way – a Yankee fan snob. Express an uninformed opinion at your own peril.

So people want to have deeper relationships with things they care about. Thats my theory, at least. Those of you who know my work know that in addition to running AJ and teaching at USC, I do some work for Spring For Music, an annual orchestra festival in Carnegie Hall every May. The festival is six nights, this year with five orchestras. Participating orchestras are chosen from dozens that apply, and their inclusion is based on the innovative programs they submit, not how “famous” they are (though some of them are). This year, the orchestras are Detroit, Baltimore, Albany, Buffalo and the National.

Spring For Music has been my playground for the past few years, a place to try out audience engagement ideas. We did a “Fantasy Orchestra Program” contest. We did an arts blogger competition a la March Madness last year.

This year, I talked them in to doing a MOOC. S4M has had raves in the press. Audiences have been wildly enthusiastic. But I’m interested in seeing if you can take this “long-form” idea and extend it to a concert series. What if you asked audiences to invest more into a concert rather than less?

Perhaps classical music has hurt itself by lowering the bar too much. Yes we want to be inclusive. We want anyone to feel they could enjoy a concert. But perhaps by saying you don’t need to invest anything into the experience to enjoy it we’ve devalued that experience.

Consider: there are thousands of book groups. Hundreds of thousands go to maker fairs, Huge online communities form around common interests and people put hours and hours into the things that interest them. In the process of participating, they become more and more invested in those communities. And they get more out of them.

So what if we did that with an arts organization? Asked people to invest in learning about it, connected those who were interested so they could learn from one another, form a community around it?

Unlike a typical educational MOOC, there’s also a live community payoff for this. Because it’s built around a series of concerts in Carnegie, those who take the course can come to the concerts  and put to use what they’ve learned. (but even those who can’t will get something out of it – the classes are not specifically about S4M – they’re about ideas.)

For the past month I’ve been traveling, recording video interviews with conductors, composers, critics and orchestra insiders (a pretty fun job I have to admit). The course raises the questions: What makes a great orchestra? What makes a great program? What makes one piece of music popular while another falls into obscurity? What’s a strategy for learning to listen? The course isn’t designed to tell you how to listen, but to point out some ways of thinking about the concert experience that ought to make it interesting.

I got some great interviews with Washington Post music critic Anne Midgette, composer Jennifer Higdon, conductors Marin Alsop, Leonard Slatkin and David Alan Miller, singer Storm Large (yes, you have to see that one), and orchestra experts Tom Morris, orchestra marketer Chris Stager, PR maven Mary Lou Falcone and artist manager David Foster. It’s quite a lineup.

The course is four weeks long and launches next Monday April 1. SInce we announced it a week or so ago, 700 people have signed up. I suspect that many who have signed up already know a lot about orchestras. My hope is that they’ll add their expertise to this. One of the cool things about a MOOC is that the prepared course content is really just a starting point, and those participating discuss and add their expertise to the discussion. This MOOC has videos but also music examples and quizzes to test your ears.

As arts organizations work on trying to deepen engagement of their community, this seems like a great experiment worth trying. Take a look and see what you think.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Katie Haydon says

    March 26, 2013 at 7:26 pm

    Fantastic, innovative, out-of-the-box, revolutionary idea, Doug. We are in!

    Reply
  2. Helen Lessick says

    May 13, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    Late to the discussion, but just caught this post, Doug.
    Digital public art collections are a MOOC and Municipal funding for contemporary public art provides the content. As a Philadelphia native, I grew up with extraordinary public art which provided education and context. Like Coursera classes, the viewer only needs to tap into the rich resources from online archives such as cultureNOW.org. Sadly most of us click through or walk on by, But when the student is ready, the teaching appears.

    Reply
  3. Dr Jerry Field says

    July 10, 2015 at 2:03 pm

    Your suggestion to have an on line course for the arts would be a start of bring arts and humanities back into the classrooms. This would be taught by people who love the arts and not someone filling in from a computer class.. The key would be offering school or college credit. Having converted corporate training programs to school credit the arts offers a substantial subject with actual course content should not be a problem, buzz me drjay2@juno.com

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Around the horn: Pesach edition | Createquity. says:
    March 29, 2013 at 6:51 am

    […] of ArtsJournal, Doug McLennan has designed a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) around the Spring for Music Festival, designed to get people to “listen smarter.” The class lineup looks pretty […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
March 2013
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Mar   Aug »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in