• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Power Law – Why Arts Organizations Need To Reinvent

April 29, 2009 by Douglas McLennan 2 Comments

Newspaper publishers have been lashing out at Google for aggregating headlines and selling ads on the news feeds. The criticisms are controversial (my thoughts here). Google directs huge rivers of traffic to news stories, and publications like that. But aggregation has in some ways come to compete with the news organizations themselves.

reinventing.jpgMost newspapers have thought of themselves as producers of news. But journalism isn’t just writing stories, it’s having the news judgment to decide what stories are important and explaining why. Google is a kind of uber-curator of news, somewhat diminishing the important news curation role of traditional editors and reporters.

More important, it pushes news organizations into the position writers have been in for years. Writers have always been a commodity whose fates have largely been determined by the publications in which they appeared. Because publications did the hiring and deciding what stories were published, they generally had the power in the relationship.

If aggregators assume the gatekeeper role, publications step down a rung, joining writers as producers rather than gatekeepers. This is a significant weakening of traditional publisher power. Publications still compete if they have a strong brand and it still means something to be published in the New York Times or the local newspaper. But even this brand power is being challenged by crowd-rated news services like Digg, which try to qualify and organize stories based on how people rate them.

So news organizations are caught in a wildly expanding consumer marketplace where they offer products (stories) that are only a click away from any of a million other stories. News organizations still have an advantage as brands and they have resources they can throw into coverage. But increasingly, individual writers and small websites can compete more efficiently because they don’t have to carry the institutional overhead. Thus a classic example of innovation (the web) subverting a less efficient model (print). Another way of putting it might be that as production and distribution gets cheaper, competition increases.

A similar dynamic might also be playing out in the arts. Traditionally, arts organizations have seen themselves as producers. But they were also  gatekeepers/curators who determined what their audiences would be  exposed to. If you’re the symphony orchestra in town, your programming is what people heard, and what they heard shaped their aesthetic.

Now there are more options. If you’re just one producer in an increasingly crowded marketplace you have the news organization problem. If your brand is strong like the Metropolitan Opera, you still have an advantage. But if you’re just another theatre company, you’re just another theatre company competing with YouTube and streaming and music and video and e-readers and games.

Now you not only have to make the case that what you do is excellent, you probably have to make the case that an audience should choose live theatre over music or video or… Saying you’re the best chamber orchestra doesn’t mean much if you can’t make the case for chamber orchestras. Advertising a star singer doesn’t mean much if you can’t make the case for the live opera experience.

The weakest place in the chain to be these days is to be the producer. Content may be king, but if you’re just another choice among many, it’s difficult to compete, especially if you’re carrying high overhead. Instead, you have to define your niche and be the expert in that niche. It’s not enough to a chamber orchestra that plays well, you have to define the niche in a way that makes you central to it.

For example: The St. Paul Chamber Orchestra has billed itself as “America’s chamber orchestra.” Well, it may be that the SPCO plays better than any other chamber orchestra in America. But what makes it “America’s chamber orchestra”? For anyone outside of Minnesota or Chicago, it’s a meaningless boast.

What if instead the orchestra attempted to define what a chamber orchestra is in America? If it pointed to the best performances and programs elsewhere, if it made itself into a resource for anyone interested in chamber orchestras? If it touted the accomplishments of those it worked with? If it created a community around the idea of and interest in chamber orchestras? Then the claim has something to back it up.

This season the orchestra celebrated its 50th anniversary, not just with a concert but with invitations to the world’s best chamber orchestras to come to St. Paul so audiences could make comparisons. That’s owning the space, a brilliant, gutsy thing to do. But outside the city the swagger is invisible.

So what?

Because success isn’t just about selling tickets in the short term. It’s about creating a community of relationships, about being more than a producer lost in a sea of choices. It’s about setting yourself up as the aggregator of an aesthetic and positioning yourself at the center of it.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Mike Levin says

    April 29, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    Douglas
    Great piece about how increasingly low barriers to entry change things, and how these suck us all into a place where honesty, and creativity, are something we can no longer avoid.
    Also, again thanks for Arts Journal, you agreggating fool, you.
    Mike Levin

    Reply
  2. Marty Ronish says

    April 30, 2009 at 7:29 am

    Doug,
    You've just proven again that content really IS king. Your clear thinking and excellent writing rise above the millions of blogs out there.
    The same is true with chamber orchestras — the cream will rise to the top — but with the decline in newspaper and radio promotion the chamber orchestra needs to find a new way to promote itself. The web is perfect, because you no longer have to just boast about being the best. You can put audio up on the web and prove it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World
  • A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
April 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in