• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Is the NEA bad for the arts?

March 18, 2009 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

A ridiculous question, sure. The National Endowment for the Arts is the channel through which the federal government invests money in the arts. And though it’s not much money, compared to what other countries invest, it’s something. Besides giving money, the NEA also has the value of drawing attention or legitimacy to the things it supports. Good things.

images.jpg

But some of the recent debates about whether the arts ought to get cabinet-level prominence in the Obama administration seemed to me to be missing something. Sure it would be nice if the feds supported the arts a bit more. And culture ought to be featured more prominently on the national stage. But these are not the best reasons to think about a new Arts Department.

The NEA has been a great supporter of the arts. But on matters of culture, it has had little or no voice on important issues of the day. Where was the NEA when media ownership rules were being discussed by the FCC? Where was the NEA when Disney and the recording and movie industries were largely shaping copyright law? Where was the NEA in speaking for artists when the stimulus package was being written?

The answer is that they weren’t. The NEA wasn’t set up to work on cultural policy. Sure, groups like Americans for the Arts advocate for the arts. But that’s different than being in the room where the policy on cultural issues is made. Sure, “a great nation deserves great art,” and supporting worthwhile arts projects is important. But the dribble of financial support for art is almost insignificant next to the impact on the arts of important legislation being shaped elsewhere in the capital without the input of artists.

I love the NEA. I do. But in larger public policy terms, maybe it’s a bit of a subterfuge. It allows the feds to claim support for the arts while making decisions on cultural policy without the arts’ participation. Think that doesn’t matter? The copyright lockdown of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act affects the ability of every artist to build on work of other artists. Attempts to change how information flows over the internet – the so-called net neutrality laws – will affect any artist delivering work over the internet. Right now, these issues are largely decided by corporate America. How do you think that’s working out?

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Tom Durham says

    March 19, 2009 at 4:39 am

    The NEA has been absent since 1989. They have folded or avoided every major arts issue. Where were they when major symphony, opera, and theater companies began to fold, “fighting to allow diva artists to smear chocolate over their bodies.” Needless to say they picked the worst issues to fight for and left most of the artists and art groups struggling for the last 20 years. Did they ever lobby Congress for arts tax support, or more educattion in the arts for schools, No. Instead they allowed themselves to be a hotbed issue receiving less money each year, spending what they receive for administrative costs and not helping the museums which are now struggling. It is an organization that has been dying and needs to end so something else can grow to support real art issues not just cult pop artists who live off grant money.

    Reply
  2. Leonard Jacobs says

    March 19, 2009 at 5:56 am

    You raise an important point — isn’t the NEA merely the conduit for whatever federal arts funding there is? As opposed to an influencer over policy? To be clear, the NEA was never meant to influence policy, and as an arm of the federal government, a federal agency, is has theoretically little place in strongarming the Congress. Or does it?

    Reply
  3. Louis Torres says

    March 19, 2009 at 10:11 am

    “The NEA . . . has the value of drawing attention or legitimacy to the things it supports. Good things.”
    Do you mean things like persuading hair salons in a New York City neighborhood to allow children between eight and twelve to offer the public free haircuts for a period of one week? Or, protesting the Guantanamo terrorist detention camp by traveling across the country in a van conducting interviews and holding public discussions on security, terror, and human rights?
    Both projects, in the category “visual arts,” were made possible through NEA grants in the past two years to Art in General, an avant-garde organization in New York. They are not exceptions.
    For a critique of the NEA, see my article “Arts and Public Support” in the recently published Encyclopedia of Libertarianism (a project of the Cato Institute) at Google Book Search.
    — Louis Torres, Co-Editor, Aristos

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • Killing NEA, NEH And PBS Is Just Collateral Damage In The Commodification Of American Values

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
March 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec   Apr »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in