• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

What happens when there are more writers than readers?

April 6, 2010 by Andrew Taylor

Author Jane Hamilton ask a rather probing question toward the end of her radio interview on To the Best of Our Knowledge (you can listen here with your Real player, interview starts at 43:25). The question evolves from a conversation about the crowds of people who want to be writers, but who aren’t well read — and the loss of filters to discover and celebrate the true visionaries among them.

The leading character in Hamilton’s most recent book, Laura Rider’s Masterpiece, longs to write a romance novel but doesn’t care to read. Says Hamilton in the interview:

I think it’s kind of an angry book about this idea that we’re all artists. So, what happens when there are more writers than there are readers? And how will the really talented young writers’ voices bubble up through the gaseous murk of the blogosphere? How will they be heard? …they probably will. I’m banking that they will. But I think it’s going to be more difficult for those real writers to find their place.

There are glorious, democratizing forces at work when almost anyone can publish their thoughts to the world. But to me, the challenging byproduct of those benefits are what Hamilton describes. How do we make space in this instant publishing world for the truly remarkable voices — in words, in song, in composition, in performance, in whatever? Particularly, how do we nurture those exceptional voices that need time and attention to grow?

This isn’t a defense of the gatekeepers or editors/curators who ran the filters before the Internet, as that system had its flaws and foibles as well. But it’s a call for the nonprofit and public arts to consider their part in answering that question.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Nina Simon says

    April 6, 2010 at 11:43 am

    Andrew,
    This post makes me wonder not about the voices emerging but about the other side of the balance – the concern that there will be “more writers than readers.”
    I have two thoughts on this.
    First, it’s not going to happen. Creators still represent a tiny fraction of the cultural landscape, and they are almost all consumers as well. Also, people create for different reasons. There are plenty of people who create but don’t have any interest in becoming professionals.
    Second, it freaks me out. When I was starting out as a poet, I was told that I should make sure I was spending five hours reading for every one I spent writing. The presumption there was that writers (and creators of all kinds) who want to really hone their craft have a lot to learn from others, and that the learning is often the most important part of the creating. So to me, the question is: what happens when people spend more time expounding than learning? What happens when we can’t listen because we talk too much?
    I think these questions are web-agnostic.

  2. Andrew Taylor says

    April 6, 2010 at 1:59 pm

    Nina,
    Thanks for the great comment. I’m also of mixed feelings about the issue and the question. I’d agree that any dogmatic approach to who gets to create and how they have to do it is problematic. Our arts history is littered with exclusion and requirements that choked more than one creative opportunity. But I am seeing a continuing need to focus on the ‘slow growth’ opportunities in a fast-production world, and wondering if part of the ‘public trust’ efforts of some arts organizations might relate to that effort.
    Didn’t mean to freak you out…but I’m glad the post encouraged a comment. It felt like a conversation worth having out loud.

  3. AnitaAshland says

    April 6, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Nice post, Andrew. It calls to mind this Wall Street Journal article about the demise of the slush pile: http://tinyurl.com/ykm5x5p
    As one of the authors in the article says:
    “These days, you need to deliver not just the manuscript but the audience,” says Mr. Levine. “More and more, the mantra in publishing is ‘Ask not what your publisher can do for you, ask what you can do for your publisher.'”
    So even though there are more channels available for people to publish, a writer has to have more than writing talent… they have to have marketing acumen and create an audience even before you publish. Most writers don’t have the time or skills for that, so that’s a major filter.

  4. Tina Hoggatt says

    April 13, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    I recently heard Mitali Perkins, an author of fiction for young readers, talk about the emerging landscape of publishing. She used the term ‘trusted curator’ to talk about the function that online writers can have as reference points for both learning and book recommendation. Cream always rises to the top. I believe that the generation of creators that are not web savvy (and may not wish to be) will be, to their detriment, caught in between the old model of writer>agent>publisher and today’s emerging model of artist-generated publicity and prepared audience. Those that are actively using online resources and social media as a matter of course will adapt and excel in this new landscape.

  5. Basil Papademos says

    June 7, 2014 at 6:55 pm

    So being a shill is more important than working on what one writes. Gawd, what a bore. If writing isn’t a compulsion and you’re not driven to do it regardless all else, then don’t waste your time. Most people aren’t any good at it, just as most people aren’t good musicians. Have you heard some of the self-published music around these days? Absolute dreck.

The #ArtsManaged Initiative

Three evolving #ArtsManaged logodigital resources on the practice of Arts Management: Field Notes (weekly newsletter), Field Guide, YouTube Channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

Recent Comments

  • Sadia Akram on Chasing beauty without losing balance: “Hey… I am working with a company where we buy 100 posts in 1 month. I want to work with…” Mar 2, 06:56
  • Andrew Taylor on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Thanks Ken! Grateful for your insights on this. I agree that it’s like screaming into the wind to decide upon…” Feb 19, 13:41
  • Ken Foster on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Hi Andrew. Totally agree with your focus of concern on the “Arts” word rather than the second word. I have…” Feb 17, 13:52
  • Andrew Taylor on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Thanks Jim! I’m so glad to have the link to your book review in JAMLS. Somehow I missed it the…” Feb 15, 15:17
  • JIm O'Connell on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Love this, Andrew! It’s clear that Google has scanned a lot more material since my article in JAMLS (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10632921.2019.1588817) which…” Feb 15, 14:27

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in