• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

To present or to preserve

February 7, 2007 by Andrew Taylor

A Washington Post article on the Cambodian ruins of an ancient temple (free registration may be required) describes a tension quite common to the management and stewardship of cultural treasures: the tension between sharing the treasure widely, and protecting it from harm. In this case, the 9th-century temple of Phnom Bakheng is drawing increasing numbers of tourists to the region, bringing money with them, but also leaving destruction in their wake.

While the easy argument places exploitation on one side of the challenge, and noble preservation on the other, it’s a false and dangerous dichotomy to construct. What’s the use in preserving something if nobody but scholars and preservationists get to see it? And what’s the use in sharing something beautiful if the act of sharing destroys the thing, itself? (Hey, I think there’s an Eagles song about this very thing…)

The best response available ensures that a portion of generated revenues are retained to secure, sustain, and restore the place or the object, and recruits third-party individuals or organizations to subsidize the experience of those who can’t afford its true full cost (sounds like the nonprofit model to me). Says John H. Stubbs of the World Monuments Fund:


“We understand the clear need to have tourists visit the temples, and of course we want them to see this great achievement by mankind. But we also need to understand that the real focus should be keeping them safe.”

That said, the deeper challenge and tension comes when the cultural heritage in question is not just a place or a thing, but a people, who often exploit or distort their own cultural traditions to attract the tourism trade. That’s where political and business leaders must bring their true creativity, commitment, and passion to bear.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. mieke kooistra says

    February 11, 2007 at 9:32 pm

    In the case of Angkor Wat and the surrounding temples the entrance fee is ridiculously low: 20 us dollars. If an entrance fee of 70-100 dollars would be charged, more money would be available for protection and restoration. Visitors staying in nearby hotels spend over 200 us dollars for a hotel room, 50 dollars for spa treatment and 60 dollars for their penne pasta lunch, or fly in for the day from Bangkok for 400 dollars. yet, these rare, ancient monuments can be climbed, touched and experienced for only 20 dollars. (and don’t talk to me about the ‘poor’ backpackers with their i-pods and other expensive gadgets). Something is seriously wrong here.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in