• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

The problem with problems

June 7, 2017 by Andrew Taylor

If you work in the arts in higher education (or any education, for that matter), you are likely talking or hearing more about “complex problems,” or perhaps “wicked problems.” These are shorthand for a wide range of messy, persistent, usually negative aspects of civil or global society — hunger, inequity, racism, terrorism, climate change, sectarianism, and so on. And these phrases are the latest reason to value and integrate the arts.

3D Problem Solving

cc flickr Chris Potter

The argument goes this way: The world has become more complex. Reason and rational knowledge aren’t sufficient anymore. Rather, robust understanding and engagement with these problems require creativity, innovation, divergent thinking, and other magic mojo we claim for the arts.

I’ll admit that I’m a proponent of such arguments. And I do believe that artistic process and practice have deep importance to civic life and effective citizens — certainly in higher education. But I worry that by leaning so heavily on a “problem” framework, we’re actually compounding the…er…problem.

Problems, in our traditional understanding, are puzzles to be solved, or negative issues to be resolved. We might follow many paths to consider and contextualize those problems (insert list of all academic disciplines here). And we might apply many methods and means to address them (same list here). If we get fancy, we might combine multiple paths, methods, and means. But still, resolving the problem is the “end” and our paths and methods are the “means”.

Artistic practice and process, on the other hand, proceed from a rather different understanding of a “problem.” Often, in an artistic work, the “problem” is the work, itself: how to make a dramatic play “hold together,” how to make a physical object “coherent,” how to make a poem “whole.” In artistic practice, the problem and solution evolve together, with a primary goal of finding the fulfillment of the creative work — not of resolving some external “problem.” As H.W. Janson describes it in his History of Art:

…the creative process consists of a long series of leaps of the imagination and the artist’s attempts to give them form by shaping the material accordingly. The hand tries to carry out the commands of the imagination and hopefully puts down a brush stroke, but the result may not be quite what had been expected, partly because all matter resists the human will, partly because the image in the artist’s mind is constantly shifting and changing, so that the commands of the imagination cannot be very precise…. In this way, by a constant flow of impulses back and forth between his mind and the partly shaped material before him, he gradually defines more and more of the image, until at last all of it has been given visible form.

The standard, dismissive response to this idea of an art work as its own problem would be “art for art’s sake.” To which I’m responding: Yes, please. Because so much of the power, insight, impact, and discovery derived through the arts come from this impulsion. As Michael Polanyi and Harry Prosch phrase it in Meaning:

…all the arts work in this way. They search for means of solving a problem — a problem which was conceived for this very purpose, i.e., its solution; and they pursue this question while continuing to shape the problem so that it will better fit the means for solving it.

At the end of this exploration, if all goes well, is a coherent, compelling, even beautiful outcome – one that is problem, solution, and question all at once.

Certainly, artistic process and practice have immeasurable value and opportunity “as tools” to explore, define, understand, and address complex problems around us. But a large part of that value comes from the different way they define and approach a “problem.” While traditional problem formation is inevitably a reduction and partition, artistic problem formation is all about seeking and shaping a coherent whole. As E.M Forster argued back in 1949:

Works of art, in my opinion, are the only objects in the material universe to possess internal order, and that is why, though I don’t believe that only art matters, I do believe in Art for Art’s Sake.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. William Osborne says

    June 9, 2017 at 2:12 am

    Art gives human identity perceptible form. The artwork is the solution, and the artist the problem. Art thus helps us understand human identity. It solves the problem of being human.

    People who instrumentalize humans will thus always want to control the arts.

  2. Edwin F. Taylor says

    June 9, 2017 at 11:31 am

    An insightful comment about the arts. More generally, every “profession,” when fully realized, must embrace the setting in which its product is created: the current — confused! — understanding of stellar structures, for example. The paints available to Michelangelo and his relation to each current Pope. Often this leads to the heresy that if I understand everything about the flower in the crannied wall, I understand “what God and man is.”

    • William Osborne says

      June 10, 2017 at 4:15 pm

      The truth is not the answer, but the searching for it.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.
  • The sneaky surprise of new arts buildings May 27, 2025
    That shiny new arts facility is full of promise and potential, but also unexpected and unrelenting expense.
  • The one and the many of board service May 20, 2025
    How do nonprofit boards balance individual impulse with collective resolve?
  • The relentless rise of pseudo-productivity May 13, 2025
    Visible activity and physical exhaustion are not useful measures of valuable work.
  • The strategy screen May 6, 2025
    A strong strategy demands a clear job description

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in