• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

The convergence of ‘independent’ and ‘differently dependent’

November 13, 2012 by Andrew Taylor

Flickr user kelseyxsunshine

I’m attending the Future of Music Summit today, hearing panel after panel of experts, artists, and advocates interested in a healthy ecosystem for independent musicians. And it’s striking me how the worlds of ‘indie music’ efforts and nonprofit arts organizations are finding their way into the same world (or at least longing toward it).

‘Independent’ in music and film tends to include artists or projects that are not financed by major labels or major studios. Of course, it’s never that simple, as artists move in and out of many systems — some parts supported by big business, some not — and some systems are complex interconnections of big business and small provider (thanks to Live Nation, Ticketmaster, and Broadway Across America among others). In a music system that’s often been a slave to ‘scale’ — big-ticket stars crowding out the channels and opportunities for smaller voices — many are working to create more accessible and equitable connections between artists and their current and future fans.

Nonprofit arts organizations may not be eligible for the ‘indie’ credential…but they are essentially designed to be ‘differently dependent’ than commercial entertainment firms. They provide, on purpose, creative work that cannot capture its full cost through direct sale to consumers. And they do so by accessing other marketplaces for capital and operating support (aka, philanthropy, government subsidy, and such).

As systems and supports for independent artists grow in size and service, and as established nonprofit arts groups strive toward more meaningful community connections and ‘networks’ of support, the two worlds seem to be coming to play in the same sandbox: providing channels and resources for artists who can’t ‘go to scale’ or don’t want to.

There’s a lot of talk at this summit about building vibrant networks of true fans, building multiple income streams to support creative work, connecting the dots between curious audiences and interesting artists, and empowering artists to manage and benefit financially from those new connections. Seems like we should talk.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Mary Margaret Schoenfeld says

    November 16, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    WESTAF has created the Independent Music on Tour program, to tour independent musicians from the Front Range of Colorado to presenters throughout the Western states. Great example of your point.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?
  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.
  • The sneaky surprise of new arts buildings May 27, 2025
    That shiny new arts facility is full of promise and potential, but also unexpected and unrelenting expense.
  • The one and the many of board service May 20, 2025
    How do nonprofit boards balance individual impulse with collective resolve?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in