• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Systematizing innovation, or the future of the B-School

January 22, 2008 by Andrew Taylor

Since I live daily at the intersection of cultural enterprise and higher education, I’m always pleased to hear that the two are mutually exclusive. Knowing my chosen environment (a business school) is contrary to my espoused value (innovative leadership of expressive endeavor) is both a personal badge of honor, and an extraordinary opportunity to blame my limited impact on external forces. Think Sisyphus meets slacktivist.

It’s particularly fun when really smart people engage the cause, as Grant McCracken does in his recent post. Says he:


If the first business of business is innovation, the first task of management reinventing the corporation continually, the first order of problem solving broad and powerful pattern recognition, the ”b-school” will not serve us. We know at a minimum that b-schools do not confer the cultural literacy, the intellectual foundations, or the conceptual tools that capitalism now prizes and requires.

As a result, McCracken has been mulling alternatives to business schools, among the more compelling being his Bloggers Business School [which brought to mind Seth Godin’s New Order Business School (NoBS), or Josh Kaufman’s Personal MBA Manifesto].

As we all ponder the preparation and continuing development of cultural managers, it’s a topic I’m eager and anxious to engage. I’ll be first to admit that business schools specifically, and higher education in general, have lots of baggage and structural flaws blocking the effective development of innovative, responsive, and reflective leaders. But I also hold the opinion, perhaps self-serving, that such environments hold unique potential for engaging the issue.

The fun lies in releasing that potential while navigating the barriers. I can’t promise that the program I direct will succeed in that endeavor (since, as McCracken states, we are not structured to succeed). But we’ll give it a positive try, nonetheless.

Thanks to George for the link!

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Chris Genteel says

    February 7, 2008 at 9:57 pm

    Hi Andrew –
    This is a subject we’ve been attacking vigorously at the University of Michigan. As a former arts manager and current MBA, I’ve teamed up with other like-minded MBAs and students on the arts campuses here to focus on entrepreneurship in the intersection of arts & business. The group is called Arts Enterprise (www.artsenterprismi.com), and we’ve had great success linking students across disciplines, and beginning to give them frameworks with which to take ideas forward — the kinds of ideas the arts are starving for. Michigan’s Ross School of Business, dedicated to “action-based learning” is a great breeding ground for this kind of work. We’d appreciate any thinking from you or the field on our initiative, and would be happy to share more.
    Sincerely,
    Chris Genteel
    Co-President
    Arts Enterprise

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in