• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Same basket, fewer eggs

April 16, 2007 by Andrew Taylor

In response to a troubled city, and what appears to be a desire to consolidate governance, the Heinz Endowments announced last month that they were refocusing their giving strategy in Pittsburgh, and shifting their significant resources into fewer causes.

The three ”big bets” that will receive 30 percent of Endowment giving over the next five years are public school reform, downtown real estate development, and economic development projects combining technological innovation with a concern for the environment. The new focus will inevitably mean that many annual grantees will see lower checks in the next five years, or no checks at all.

Pittsburgh literary critic Bob Hoover flags the fact that the arts are not directly listed among the ”big bets,” despite a history of significant giving from the Endowments to the arts downtown. He worries that the loss of contributed support will compound the population loss and audience exodus already underway:

Our major writers took their inspiration from a city that encouraged their imagination with its crowded streets of people from different cultures, its classical educational system, its pride in the Carnegie Institute and Library and the industrial wealth that supported the arts….

We’re at a crossroads, and it seems to lead out of town. The third piece of bad news might be that our artists will be taking the next bus to somewhere else.

Pittsburgh and the Heinz Endowments have spent serious resources over the past decades on building and sustaining the city’s vitality through the arts. The new focus suggests that the emerging ”theory of change” doesn’t directly include the arts in the top three levers to be pulled.

ADDENDUM (4/19/07): The thoughtful comments to this post by John Federico and the Heinz Endowment’s Janet Sarbaugh underscore that this is a complex issue, and that Heinz giving to the arts, especially downtown, advances at least two of the three new ”big bets” identified by the Endowments. That said, redirecting 30 percent of resources means that some traditional recipients of Heinz support will be left with an empty hat next year. It will be interesting to see who that is.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. John Federico says

    April 16, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    I think that today’s post reflects a bit of an oversimplification of the Heinz Endowments’ position vis-a-vis the arts. First, a big chunk of the downtown development projects that they are expected to support are being built by the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust, which has already added significant theatre capacity by building/renovation performing arts spaces, and is now making a transition to a new phase of development by building residences in the Cultural District.
    Moreover, a look at the Endowments’ website and program guidelines indicates that they will continue to have the largest arts grantmaking program in Pittsburgh, committing $9 million annually to grants in the arts. While it’s likely that the biggest grants in the arts will go to downtown organizations that are able to address one or all of the “big bets,” there will still be money for well-managed, artistically sound arts organizations in and around Pittsburgh.

  2. Janet Sarbaugh says

    April 19, 2007 at 9:06 am

    The Heinz Endowments is just as committed to the arts as we have ever been. The article that this blog entry is based on was written by a reporter who never had a conversation with anyone at the Heinz Endowments, most especially me (The Director of the Arts and Culture Program!).
    Anyone who takes a close look at the Endowments’ Website (www.heinz.org), as John Federico notes, will see that our level of arts funding is remaining steady. We will continue to be the largest arts funder in Pittsburgh’s foundation community. Our important core programs, including general operating support to major institutions and the Small Arts Initiative will continue at their current levels.
    Our new strategic plan does concentrate a third of our giving in three strategic initiatives, at least two of which will take on more arts related giving, not less. The downtown cultural district and cultural organizations, which we view as critical to downtown revitalization, are key elements of our downtown strategy. Our long-term goal to promote arts learning and participation will continue, only now with a special focus on Pittsburgh.
    As this plan unfolds, it will be come apparent that the arts remain central to the Endowments’ grantmaking. We recognize it as one of the unique strengths of the region and one that will continue to play a major role in the region’s revitalization.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in