• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Measuring cultural vitality

January 8, 2007 by Andrew Taylor

Lots of communities and consultants talk about ”cultural vitality,” and the benefits of achieving that status for their local economy, education system, creative workforce, and quality of life. But few have actually detailed what they mean by the term, or by what measures they would know that they had achieved their goal.

Cultural Vitality in CommunitiesA clear definition of ”cultural vitality” and specific measures for assessing that vitality are two of the goals of the Arts and Culture Indicators Project, a decade-long effort of the Urban Institute. The latest monograph emerging from that project, Cultural Vitality in Communities: Interpretation and Indicators, was released last month, and is available for download in PDF format.

The report defines ”cultural vitality” in a wide and inclusive way, encompassing professional arts venues, producers, and presenters, but also amateur, informal, educational, individual, and community elements:


Cultural vitality is the evidence of creating, disseminating, validating, and supporting arts and culture as a dimension of everyday life in communities.

Building on this definition, the report details the available data at national, regional, state, and local levels, recommending the most consistent and accessible to the task. The resulting indicators still favor the more formal nonprofit and commercial creative activities in any community, simply because they are tracked more reliably by government and related research projects (IRS data, charitable statistics, labor statistics, and so on). But the report points the way to building more rich and inclusive assessments of vitality on all levels.

Of particular interest are the case studies of cities already at work defining cultural vitality for themselves, and creating on-going efforts to measure their success. These include the Boston Indicators Project, the Metropolitan Chicago Information Center, and the Metropolitan Philadelphia Indicators Project, among others.

If you or your community are struggling to connect arts activity in your community in a more dynamic, integral, and accountable way, this report is worth a read.

Filed Under: main, Readings

Comments

  1. Sam Jones says

    January 8, 2007 at 10:54 am

    One of the problems here in the UK is that although measurement is necessary, it has created a situation in which governmental funding for culture has become driven by the demands of other policy agenda (contribution to local economies, social inclusion and so forth).
    From what I understand, I know that in the US, funding is less centrally driven, so this could be a bit UK-centric. Nevertheless, it kind of chimes with, say, what the RAND foundation have written about and certainly with some of the conversations I had when visiting the US in July.
    This said, it is encouraging that in the UK, there is a growing awareness that funding demands must take into account more intrinsic values of culture. In other words, you’re not going to get too much of an economic effect if nobody likes the stuff in the first place. How, then, do you measure the intrinsic value of culture so that cultural practitioners have a reliable measure of performance and expectations are set around things accordingly?
    It’s something we’ve been working on: http://www.demos.co.uk/publications//culturallegitimacy
    Hope that’s useful.

  2. Joan says

    January 12, 2007 at 9:21 pm

    It was quite a shock to me this year when I realized that the economic affect of culture has more to do with the market exchanges that occur as artists work than with ticket sales when they perform, or show. Whether the society likes what is being presented has less to do with actual economic activity. If a particular event bombs, or a company bombs or an artist’s work just doesn’t sell, those people still had to rent venues, buy scripts, materials, costumes, use sell and rent sheet music, sign recording contracts, use specially skilled tax prepareres, arts managers, contract teachers, pay school fees, buy arts books, arts agents and all the rest of the special services only the arts use, even the ones who will eventually bomb. That’s the arts economy really, and it’s that business that keeps cities and neighbourhoods hopping. The actual ticket sales are just the tip of the iceberg!

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.
  • The sneaky surprise of new arts buildings May 27, 2025
    That shiny new arts facility is full of promise and potential, but also unexpected and unrelenting expense.
  • The one and the many of board service May 20, 2025
    How do nonprofit boards balance individual impulse with collective resolve?
  • The relentless rise of pseudo-productivity May 13, 2025
    Visible activity and physical exhaustion are not useful measures of valuable work.
  • The strategy screen May 6, 2025
    A strong strategy demands a clear job description

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in