• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

For another $30 million, you get cupholders

January 31, 2008 by Andrew Taylor

If you’re fond of tracking multi-hundred-million civic structures (and who isn’t?), your eyes would be fixed on Texas and New Jersey, where the money is flowing like Mentos and Diet Coke.

The Dallas Center for the Performing Arts just bumped its fundraising goal from $275 million to $338 million. The Dallas Cowboys new stadium is pricing in at $1 billion. And the Giants-Jets stadium development at Meadowlands in New Jersey is likely to cost $1.3 billion.

While the sports stadiums are more gargantuan, the Dallas Center for the Performing Arts is a story with more nuance (at least for this blog). The new goal and enhanced facilities plan grew from a simple discovery — that they could afford to build what they already had in mind. Says President and CEO Bill Lively:


”When we realized that we would achieve the original $275 million,” he said, ”we were ready to make a recommendation for the board to increase the goal to build more stuff.”

Might the new goal include more endowment to cover the more-than-likely-higher-than-expected operating expenses for all this new stuff and the stuff already in the plan? Of course not. Such money will be raised more aggressively in 2009, says the article. For now, the focus is ”more stuff.”

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Vickie says

    January 31, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    Well, it is Texas!

  2. New Yorker says

    February 1, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Contrast & Compare assignment: Carniv… sorry, Arhst Center and the Dallas Center.

  3. Stephanie says

    February 1, 2008 at 10:51 am

    Anyone placing bets on how long it will be before we start hearing about the Dallas Ctr for the Perf Arts’ struggle to cover operating costs and appealing to the city gov’t for a bail-out? It would also be easier to raise the endowment money in the context of the initial campaign rather than going back to donors a year later and say, “Oh, by the way, all that money we raised – it wasn’t enough for us to actually operate the thing.”

  4. Victoria Garcia says

    February 1, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    Unfortunately, Texas is not alone in making the mistake of not looking at the long term endowment needs of new/revitalized arts centers.

  5. Chris Casquilho says

    February 1, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    I’m sort of speechless. The phenomenon reminds me of two things:
    Thing the first: A canny entrepreneur with an ax to grind against crystal meth jump started the now famous Montana Meth Program. Millions were spent raising awareness of meth abuse among teens and chasing nascent experimenters away from use by saturating the visual media with graphic and terrifying ads. (So far, this probably isn’t a very good parallel.) The program has its critics on a variety of fronts, but the one that is relevant to this post is that for 1/10 of the annual funding for the program, a theatre in a Montana community with meth problems could have funded its children’s theatre program for a decade. It’s one thing to have a performing arts center – it’s another to have an extravagance that comes at the cost of other critical programs serving a similar need. I get the same feeling when I see a funny-but-forgettable movie that cost, oh say, five million bucks or so when I’ve been spending the week scratching for money to buy garbage cans to put outside my theatre.
    Thing the second: Today at a legislative forum, our state assemblywoman mentioned that the word “billion” flows from our mouths with surprising ease these days. To illustrate her point, she noted that one billion seconds ago, it was 1959.

  6. Mary Schmidt says

    February 4, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    “Build more stuff” – well, isn’t that the American Dream?
    Seriously, this is sad – they’re raising more money because they can and then they’ll find a way to use it. (“Hey! What about some more marble!) What if, instead, they used the funds to endow an arts education fund for inner-city kids? Oh there I go again…

  7. Terry says

    February 8, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    In reading the whole article, the increase makes some sense. Mr. Lively makes the point that adding to the physical plant later gets more expensive. Having done both new construction and renovation of recent construction in theatres, if you know what you will want to add (or put back into the building plan that you cut out to reduce the initial cost) and you can get it in with initial construction, you are better off getting it up front.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in