• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Choosing not to be active

May 4, 2007 by Andrew Taylor

A circuitous route (Neill Roan’s blog to Kevin Daoust to Steve Rubel to Forrester Research’s weblog) led me to Forrester’s recent report on ”Social Technographics.” The report explores and categorizes the behavior of individuals on-line, focusing on how they use social technologies (such as weblogs, feeds, tags, social network sites, etc.). The report, itself, comes at a cost ($275). But the public elements of the findings are useful on their own (for more details, see Steve Rubel’s entry).

Forrester participation ladderThe research authors offer a segmentation model, based on on-line consumer behavior, that cuts to the question I was asking earlier this week: How participatory is the web, really? And how true is the assumption that web technologies create a world of content-creators rather than a world of content-watchers.

According to Forrester’s research, a full 52 percent of on-line consumers are ”inactives,” engaging in none of the identified social networking activities. Some 33 percent prefer to watch, read, or listen, without contributing to content. While those higher up the ”participation ladder” are more active collectors of content, critics or commenters, or creators of their own pages, blogs or videos.

You can see the participation ladder in their graphic on-line.

It’s a handy reminder that in our enthusiasm and panic to embrace the participatory audience — the hands-on arts consumer — we shouldn’t forget the large percentage that really just want to watch. Further, the same individual consumer may change their preference for direct engagement as often as they change their mood. The trick remains in offering a range of options for connecting to creative work, some sleeves-up and hands-on, others reactive or responsive, and still others left to quietly observe.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Marco says

    May 4, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    This makes sense to me and I’m not sure it speaks contrary to the notion of increased content-creation via the web. In other words, of the sites that I visit, sure I just watch way more than 52% of ’em. And when I connect with something, I engage – aside from my own site and blog for my image-making. So perhaps we are seeing a bit of selectivity on the part of potential creators. After all, there’s more to life than web-based content creation. (There is, isn’t there??)
    Cheers,
    Marco

  2. Ryan says

    May 7, 2007 at 9:28 am

    This is a fine example of what true American culture is like. People have become accustomed to sitting down and possibly reading what someone has said on a internet article, but choose not to respond in hopes that someone else will say what they are thinking, or already has. Though in my mind, you shouldn’t need to respond to everything people say in a post or what not. It’s ok to be selective and choose those articles which actually inspire to respond to them.

  3. Jim O'Connell says

    May 7, 2007 at 3:19 pm

    Andrew, your comment “may change their preference…as often as they change their mood” is absolutely on point. And it doesn’t relate only to the web.
    When I moved from Arizona to Wisconsin 15 years ago, I sought a church community to replace one in which I had been extremely – EXTREMELY – engaged. After a number of unsatisfactory visits, I realized that what I really wanted in a new congregation at the time was the freedom to sit alone in the back pew.
    My point is that, however much technology has changed, human nature has not. To quote the eminent social psychologists of the PeterPaul candy company, “Sometimes you feel like a nut. Sometimes you don’t.”

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in