• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Calibrating complexity

November 7, 2022 by Andrew Taylor

Managers of all sorts, including arts managers, frequently have to decide about complexity. When we select technology tools, rent/build/buy buildings, make policy, build teams, or develop work processes, we’re calibrating how complex those things need to be against how much time, attention, and money our audiences and organizations actually have to navigate them. If a solution is too simple, it gets flummoxed when it meets reality. If it’s too complex, it unnecessarily exhausts the organization with entangled demands.

Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash

Think, for example, about ticketing. If your organization works entirely through day-of-event, walk-up attendance – without a need to capture names and cultivate donors – a basic point-of-sale system is entirely fine. Even a cash box and a card table can do the trick (although credit card processing is probably a baseline). Choosing a system that does a lot more than that would only add drag and distraction for the audience and the staff. But that same approach in a high-volume, donor-driven, loyalty-optimizing arts organization would be unworkable.

The same is true for arts facilities. If perfect acoustics, sightlines, assigned seats, complex stage rigging, sound systems, catering space, and beyond aren’t essential to the work or its meaningful connection to an audience, they are, instead, cost factors in time and money that pull your focus.

At such decision points, it’s tempting either to overreach or entrench. Overreach sounds like “we don’t need all these features or details or processes, but we might someday.” Entrenchment sounds like “sure, there’s growing friction and frustration in our current system, but it’s been serving us well for a long time.”

The Goldilocks response – not too much, not too little – lives at the shifting intersection of two ideas:

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.

Attributed (probably incorrectly) to Albert Einstein

Any control system needs a repertory of responses at least as various as the system it seeks to control.

My restatement of W. Ross Ashby’s “Law of Requisite Variety“

The first idea calls us to reduce every system to its most essential requirements: what do we really need this system to do and what is the absolute minimum structure, scale, complexity do we need to do that? The second idea calls us to interrogate that baseline against our lived experience: of the billion complexities a particular aspect of the world contains, which do we actually care about, and how must our system be responsive to those?

These bracketing ideas encourage us to find the “simplest possible” system – when selecting or building a policy, practice, technology, physical space, analysis/evaluation approach, and such – while adjusting what “simplest possible” means as our efforts or environments change. If you are drawn to highly complex and shiny systems, this tension can pull you back to reality. If you are drawn to steady-on, muddle-through, the-old-ways-work entrenchment, this tension can nudge you forward.

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Trevor O'Donnell says

    November 7, 2022 at 2:08 pm

    Elon Musk should probably read this.

The #ArtsManaged Initiative

Three evolving #ArtsManaged logodigital resources on the practice of Arts Management: Field Notes (weekly newsletter), Field Guide, YouTube Channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

Recent Comments

  • Sadia Akram on Chasing beauty without losing balance: “Hey… I am working with a company where we buy 100 posts in 1 month. I want to work with…” Mar 2, 06:56
  • Andrew Taylor on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Thanks Ken! Grateful for your insights on this. I agree that it’s like screaming into the wind to decide upon…” Feb 19, 13:41
  • Ken Foster on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Hi Andrew. Totally agree with your focus of concern on the “Arts” word rather than the second word. I have…” Feb 17, 13:52
  • Andrew Taylor on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Thanks Jim! I’m so glad to have the link to your book review in JAMLS. Somehow I missed it the…” Feb 15, 15:17
  • JIm O'Connell on What’s in a name: Arts Management?: “Love this, Andrew! It’s clear that Google has scanned a lot more material since my article in JAMLS (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10632921.2019.1588817) which…” Feb 15, 14:27

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in