• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Balancing the triangle at Steppenwolf

October 24, 2005 by Andrew Taylor

An exceptionally interesting case study of Steppenwolf’s past 25 years (available for download in pdf format from the Nonprofit Finance Fund) paints a complex picture of how the organization moved in and out of balance as it grew from tiny to iconic.

Like other analyses from the NFF, this story explores the dynamic balance in arts organizations among three sides of a pyramid: ”the artistic mission; the organizational capacity in the form of
staff, skills, and investment in business operations; and the capital base, principally
real estate, cash, investments, and equipment.” The authors argue, quite convincingly, that changes to any one side will necessarily bring changes and stresses to the other sides. If you expand your artistic mission, for example, either capacity or capital will need to adjust, as well. If you buy or build a building and dramatically expand your capital base, artistic and capacity issues will eventually smack you in the face.

The issues of edifice are particularly vexing to creative organizations, since building ownership seems like a great way to control your creative destiny — all the time and space you’ve been dreaming of but could never attain. But buildings inevitably turn arts organizations into landlords, with a weight and responsibility that can crush the creative soul. Says the study:


Real estate and its operation are, above all else, a mass of fixed costs. Moreover, the production expenses required for mounting a show and filling the house in a bigger venue are fixed as well. But the unpredictability of ticket revenue — and to a lesser but still important extent, the variability of production expenses — makes high fixed costs dangerous and confining. That’s especially true for a company like Steppenwolf, whose reputation is based on the presentation of challenging work that will sometimes flop.

It’s great to read a ‘happy’ case study, not driven by disaster or collapse, but by decisions that actually turned out well in the end. It’s even better to read a nonprofit business story with depth and dynamics worthy of the theater world.

Filed Under: main, Readings

Comments

  1. Sean says

    October 23, 2005 at 10:19 pm

    Thanks for pointing this study out. Looks like good reading.

  2. Frank says

    October 24, 2005 at 11:41 am

    Space is like a drug for us theater types — we want it, and we can’t get enough of it. But it also comes with lots of nasty side-effects, like those high fixed costs.
    The amount of time and energy an ED at a large regional cultural institution spends on janitorial and physical plant decisions is staggering.
    A friend’s dad buys doctors’ offices from them and then leases them back. This way the Doctor is freed from the debt, overhead, and maintenance of owning a building, which is not their forte (nor should it be).
    My friend has suggested to me that a similar nonprofit developer could be created to consolidate those physical plant operations, buying up giant arts spaces and leasing them back to their tenants. Such a developer would have to be community- and not profit-oriented, of course. There would have to be something to prevent them from turning it into condos. Maybe a 99-year lease or something.
    This would have two main advantages:
    1. It would free up the organization from the non-mission-related tasks of building administration (plumbing, electrical, etc.)
    2. Capital money is very hard to come by. Funders increasingly want to to fund projects, not infrastructure. EDs moan about this all the time. So why not sell back the building, and then roll your lease payments into your (highly fundable) programming costs?
    Worth considering… seems like it might bear upon the earlier discussion on the Overture Center.

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.
  • The sneaky surprise of new arts buildings May 27, 2025
    That shiny new arts facility is full of promise and potential, but also unexpected and unrelenting expense.
  • The one and the many of board service May 20, 2025
    How do nonprofit boards balance individual impulse with collective resolve?
  • The relentless rise of pseudo-productivity May 13, 2025
    Visible activity and physical exhaustion are not useful measures of valuable work.
  • The strategy screen May 6, 2025
    A strong strategy demands a clear job description

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in