• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

In The Church Of Big Data, Artistic Judgment Is Just A Data Point

August 29, 2016 by Douglas McLennan Leave a Comment

churchdata
A piece by Yuval Noah Harari in the Financial Times this weekend delves into our fascination with Big Data. The tech industry has made so many billions of dollars being able to track, quantify and insert itself into our behavior  that many have signed on as adherents to the Church of Big Data.

Just as divine authority was legitimised by religious mythologies, and human authority was legitimised by humanist ideologies, so high-tech gurus and Silicon Valley prophets are creating a new universal narrative that legitimises the authority of algorithms and Big Data.

Lately we’re seeing a steady stream of stories at ArtsJournal about attempts to algorithmatize creativity. But that’s merely the frontier of the data-driven gospel, the idea that algorithms and intelligent machines will more efficiently be able to create the things we want. The mainstream orthodoxy of Big Data, though, is the argument that data is better than we are at understanding who we are and what we like.

Just as free-market capitalists believe in the invisible hand of the market, so Dataists believe in the invisible hand of the dataflow. As the global data-processing system becomes all-knowing and all-powerful, so connecting to the system becomes the source of all meaning. The new motto says: “If you experience something — record it. If you record something — upload it. If you upload something — share it.”

In other words, we’re all contributors to a giant data organism that ultimately conveys back to us what our pieces of it mean. Hedge fund managers, baseball team owners and increasingly now, arts funders, are subscribing to the Big Data doctrine that measurable data is the foundation of success, trumping human intuition, experience and knowledge.

Scientific insights into the way our brains and bodies work suggest that our feelings are not some uniquely human spiritual quality. Rather, they are biochemical mechanisms that all mammals and birds use in order to make decisions by quickly calculating probabilities of survival and reproduction.

And who can argue with data? But here’s where it gets interesting. Harari argues that “contrary to popular opinion, feelings aren’t the opposite of rationality; they are evolutionary rationality made flesh.” And while machines loaded with massive amounts of data can project forward based on a complex past, the artistic mind still, for the moment, has an advantage.

Even though humanists were wrong to think that our feelings reflected some mysterious “free will”, up until now humanism still made very good practical sense. For although there was nothing magical about our feelings, they were nevertheless the best method in the universe for making decisions — and no outside system could hope to understand my feelings better than me.

But:

We are now at the confluence of two scientific tidal waves. On the one hand, biologists are deciphering the mysteries of the human body and, in particular, of the brain and of human feelings. At the same time, computer scientists are giving us unprecedented data-processing power. When you put the two together, you get external systems that can monitor and understand my feelings much better than I can. Once Big Data systems know me better than I know myself, authority will shift from humans to algorithms. Big Data could then empower Big Brother.

So are we all doomed to play our roles as predicted and determined by data-crunching machines? Harari observes that in the mass media model of today we already live under, there’s already a crude version of this in place.

In the end, it’s a simple empirical question. As long as you have greater insight and self-knowledge than the algorithms, your choices will still be superior and you will keep at least some authority in your hands. If the algorithms nevertheless seem poised to take over, it is mainly because most human beings hardly know themselves at all.

Image: Wikimedia

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: arts & tech

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • CoolWriter on What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?: “Netflix is ​​a good example of how rapidly changing technologies can strike even a very advanced business project, tightly tied…” Jan 2, 04:23
  • Jam on What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?: “I understand that Kindles, Kobos and Nooks are also dropping off with many returning to real tangible books, to read,…” Oct 23, 13:18
  • william osborne on Classical Music’s #MeToo Stories Are Just A First Step: “There is an important factual omission in your comment. CIM did not just pay the alleged victim in the 2007…” Jul 30, 20:43
  • ariel on How a Beethoven Tweet Broke Our Twitter Feed (And Other Lessons About Social Media Today): “To most of the world the name Beethoven means nothing and the 9th, symphony even less so . One suspects…” Jul 29, 17:26
  • G.M. Palmer on How a Beethoven Tweet Broke Our Twitter Feed (And Other Lessons About Social Media Today): “Re the Beethoven #9 article: Kind of reminds me of Third Reich stuff like they commissioned a new Midsummer Night's…” Jul 27, 05:07
  • Singer on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “It could also be argued that there WERE a lot of musicians back then as well but didn't have the…” Jun 26, 17:01
  • Sheryl Smith on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “I have noticed that artists look to everyone but themselves when the rent on their garret becomes harder to pay.…” Apr 14, 17:41
  • Jaym on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “That won't work. The vast majority of contemporary art is bought as a tool by people who want to mark…” Dec 28, 18:35
  • Jaym on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “Haha the arts education lobby. Must be the most impotent lobby on the face of the earth. I don't think…” Dec 28, 18:18
  • Peter Nelson on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “For purposes of this discussion how are we defining "artist"? Are the various creatives involved in the advertising industry, the…” Mar 17, 13:02

Top Posts

  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Is Opera The Real 21st Century Art Form?
  • A New Blog At NAJP
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?

Recent Posts

  • What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game? October 23, 2018
  • Classical Music’s #MeToo Stories Are Just A First Step July 30, 2018
  • How a Beethoven Tweet Broke Our Twitter Feed (And Other Lessons About Social Media Today) July 26, 2018
  • Five Story Highlights From The Past Week 02.19.17: Trapped By PACs, New WTC As Cautionary Tale, Exploiting Humanities Workers February 20, 2017
  • Join Us Today For A Livestream: Artistic Leadership In A Border City February 17, 2017
August 2016
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?
  • Classical Music’s #MeToo Stories Are Just A First Step
  • How a Beethoven Tweet Broke Our Twitter Feed (And Other Lessons About Social Media Today)
  • Five Story Highlights From The Past Week 02.19.17: Trapped By PACs, New WTC As Cautionary Tale, Exploiting Humanities Workers
  • Join Us Today For A Livestream: Artistic Leadership In A Border City

Copyright © 2019 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.