• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

You are here: Home / Archives for Uncategorized

What are Learning Outcomes For?

November 24, 2020 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

Facts. Facts. Facts.

‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’ ‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer. ‘Now girl number twenty,’ said Mr Gradgrind. ‘You know what a horse is.’ The opening chapters of Dickens’ Hard Times probably have all of us recoil at the insistence of Mr Gradgrind on a school where … [Read more...]

Economic Impact: A Quick and Dirty Critique

November 17, 2020 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

big impact

Teaching arts policy this fall, I needed a two-page briefing to warn my students off using economic impact studies as an arts advocacy tool. Here's the result: What is an Economic Impact Study? Definitions are hard to come by. I can tell you how a number is calculated, so let’s start there. Pick a sector: it can be film production in a state, or nonprofit arts organizations, or cranberry farming, or anything. First ask: What were total sales in that sector in a state over the course of a year? That should be easy to figure – every … [Read more...]

Voting for arts funding – a short video

March 24, 2020 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

We are making the adjustment to teaching arts policy at a distance for the remainder of the semester, and so I'm about to get used to (and hopefully better at) short videos for students, practitioners, anyone with an interest. In this one - I kept it to eighteen minutes - I talk about a study I did on the 2002 referendum in Metro Detroit that would have seen a property tax increase to provide funding for a number of arts organizations. It failed. In my study I took precinct-level voting data, matched the precincts to census tracts, and … [Read more...]

Metrics at the museum

April 23, 2017 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

too many people pulled and pushed around

The Washington Post's Philip Kennicott decided to try visiting the popular Kusama exhibit at the Hirshhorn not as a critic, with all its special viewing privileges, but as an ordinary member of the public. The crowds and the rush, as we might expect, reduced the quality of the experience. We might enjoy a play or concert more when the house is full, but that doesn't apply so well to museums. In one well-executed piece of research, Maddison and Foster found visitors would be willing to pay a significant entry fee to the British Museum if it … [Read more...]

Dynamic pricing and market segmentation at the theatre (and the hospital)

March 23, 2015 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

how much for a bed with a view?

This post is about theatre pricing, from a unlikely source. Today's New York Times has a piece by Austin Frakt on hospital pricing, and whether and how changes in funding of patients through public sector programs might change hospital charges to privately insured patients. Mid-way through, the article looks for an analogy from the arts: The theory that hospitals charge private insurers more because public programs pay less is known as cost shifting. What underlies this theory is that a hospital’s costs — those for staff, equipment, supplies, … [Read more...]

Pay-what-you-decide at the theatre

February 2, 2015 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

The Stage News reports on a trial run of pay-what-you-decide pricing at the regional theatre in Stockton, UK: The Pay What You Decide system is now in effect for all theatre productions at the arts centre for six months, following a trial on a one-man show at the venue. Too Much, Too Young, starring Jack Bennett in January, took nearly 50% more than the theatre expected, with almost one third of the audience new to theatre performances at the ARC. Although the theatre would usually charge £10 for a show such as Too Much, Too Young, … [Read more...]

Efficiency in Fund Raising – A Technical Note

December 5, 2014 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

marginal

The National Center for Arts Research has released its report on The State of the Arts - a compendium of data and what I call 'kitchen sink' regressions (i.e. looking for statistical relationships by including all data that might conceivably matter and seeing what comes out the other end, rather than generating the regressions through a more formal model of firm behavior. Not that there is anything wrong with that - I've done it myself in research papers). In their section on fundraising, they find: The average organization brought in … [Read more...]

Price discrimination and timing

November 6, 2014 by Michael Rushton 4 Comments

this is going to cost you

Publishers delay the release of paperback versions of books as a means of price discrimination. 'Strong' customer markets pay the premium price for the immediately available hardcover, while 'weak' customer markets pay the lower price for the paperback, which is inferior in two ways: less sturdy binding, and you have to wait a year or so to obtain it. This earns more for the publisher than releasing all versions at one time. This strategy is only used where there is a premium attached to immediate access, such as the most popular fiction and … [Read more...]

The superstar economy

August 21, 2014 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

no flat screen for you

The distribution of artists' earnings is heavily skewed, much more unequal than in the population as a whole, between some who earn very, very much and those whose earnings are negligible (if not zero, in their search for free exposure). The economic analysis of 'superstars', pioneered by Sherwin Rosen, finds that when given a choice audiences will, by a great majority, buy from what is considered to be the very best, and so the very best capture the lion's share of the earnings. When are earnings likely to be most skewed? There are two main … [Read more...]

Sir Alan Peacock

August 7, 2014 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

I was saddened to read of the death of Sir Alan Peacock, a most influential figure in the scholarship, and application, of economic analysis of the arts. The Daily Telegraph's obituary is here. I remember back to when I first began exploring the field of cultural economics, and his (then recent) book Paying the Piper was one of the first I picked up on the subject. Years later when the International Journal of Cultural Policy invited a group of us to write a short essay on the book that had most influenced us, that was my choice. … [Read more...]

Next Page »

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton teaches in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the arts, copyright, nonprofit organizations and tax policy, and served as Co-Editor of the Journal of Cultural Economics. At IU he teaches Read More…

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

@RushtonIU

Tweets by @RushtonIU

Recent Comments

  • Ella Baff on Economic Impact: A Quick and Dirty Critique: “Dear Michael, if I may, I appreciate your Arts Journal article, “For What It’s Worth.” I have advised against economic…” Nov 18, 05:56
  • Coralie on A Policy for the Arts: The White Paper of 1965 (updated with a link): “https://action.labour.org.uk/page/-/blog%20images/policy_for_the_arts.pdf” May 19, 08:31
  • Jerry Yoshitomi on Voting for arts funding – a short video: “I was not able to download the PDF of your article on “voting for arts funding.” I am very much…” Mar 25, 16:08
  • Lance Davis on Voting for arts funding – a short video: “Thank you, Michael. Good to see it laid out so clearly.” Mar 25, 10:11
  • Richard Layman on The wealth tax and the museum: “Note that the “one economist” you cite is the same Tyler Cowan. Maybe you should have said “Elsewhere, Cowan argues…”” Nov 22, 03:47
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in