• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

When dynamic pricing makes sense

March 11, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

use this fern for $2 an hour“Let’s move before the raise the parking rate.” Palmerston North, New Zealand, has the latest in dynamic pricing for parking. From Offsetting Behavior (via Marginal Revolution):

The 33-space carpark in the city’s Church Street has been kitted out with solar-powered sensors by local parking technology firm Frogparking that can tell which parks are occupied. Drivers pay for parking through their smartphone.

Frogparking has been providing ticketless parking systems to Palmerston North for a few years, but director Don Sandbrook said the new system was its most advanced yet, with cheaper parking if there were lots of spaces available and higher prices if they were nearly all taken. The tariff ranges from 50 cents to $2 an hour.

Makes sense to me: The system charges drivers according to the value of the space, which is determined by its scarcity; it is real-time; it provides some incentives to shop when the area is less crowded. And it doesn’t come with some of the problems that arts organizations have when implementing dynamic pricing: cuts in prices don’t send an adverse signal about the quality of the experience (50 cents or $2 an hour, a parking space is just a parking space); and it does not carry the problem that arts goods have of people being cautious about buying in advance if they think the ticket price might fall before the concert date – there are no advance purchases of parking.

Dynamic pricing: yes for parking spaces, still cautious about applying to the arts.

Share:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Comments

  1. Tracy says

    March 17, 2014 at 1:35 pm

    What do you make of Disney’s use of dynamic pricing for for-profit Broadway musicals? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/17/theater/ticket-pricing-puts-lion-king-atop-broadways-circle-of-life.html?hpw&rref=arts&_r=0

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “That too. Politics in art isn’t a matter of having the right position on an issue, but the matter of…” Jun 10, 02:19
  • Michael Rushton on Gut Punch: “I agree. There can be interesting art about politics, but, if I recall correctly as said by Tom Stoppard, the…” Jun 9, 11:27
  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “Naveen Kumar has a very narrow view of what “big questions” are.; but that’s par for the course these days.…” Jun 9, 10:15
  • Michael Rushton on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “Hello Brian, I’m not sure how much I qualify as an intellectual, but this liberal conservative will make the affirmation…” May 25, 15:52
  • Brian Newhouse on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “It seems to me that in order to counter Bourdieu’s arguments, especially as they might apply to government arts policy…” May 25, 15:06
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in