• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Lost In A Museum? Google To The Rescue

It’s true, museums are confusing to people who don’t frequent them. I don’t mind wandering, unless I’m in a hurry, but I know that other people do.

As the newsdesk of the Smithsonian wrote yesterday:

“What can we see?” and “How do we get there?” are two of the most common questions asked by Smithsonian visitors.

Naturally, Google, which annoyed me and other art-lovers by forcing us to use the Google Art Project only on its browser, Chrome, is making that up to us by using its mapping app in museums. All 17 of the Smithsonian’s museums (and the National Zoo) have been mapped room by room in cooperation with Google. As the Smithsonian said:

Beginning today, many of the millions of yearly visitors to the Smithsonian can electronically explore the building interiors, floor by floor, and pinpoint themselves within the building. The technology allows visitors with Google Maps for Android to navigate within and between each museum.

Users will see themselves on the map as a blue dot that will show their location and orientation within the context of exhibits, stairs, restrooms, eateries and other features. Step-by-step walking directions between destinations are also available within the app, providing visitors guided navigation within each museum.

Actually, it’s not just the Smithsonian — the De Young Museum in San Francisco, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, the Cincinnati Museum Center (?) and the American Museum of Natural History in New York have also submitted their floorplans to Google, which has made them available.

This is the same technology Google uses for airports, casinos, malls, Bloomingdale’s and other places people need directions. Made available last November, this app now includes more than 10,000 indoor maps, according to PC Magazine.

For its part, Google said:

More museums are adding their floor plans to Google Maps for Android soon, including the SFMOMA, The Phillips Collection, the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art and the National WWII Museum in New Orleans. If you’re interested in getting your museum’s floor plan included in Google Maps, visit the Google Maps Floor Plans tool.

I was just talking about technology with a couple of museum directors in recent days, and while it seems that technology is coming to every museum, they may be forced to choose which company’s technology they’ll favor in their own use. It’s inevitable, I guess, but I’m not sure it’s a good thing.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of Google

Saco’s Panorama Also Comes To Light

After decades of obscurity….Panoramas are back in vogue, it seems. Late last month, the Saco Museum in Maine unveiled its Moving Panorama of Pilgrim’s Progress, which like The Panorama Of the Monumental Grandeur of the Mississippi Valley at the St. Louis Art Museum (which I wrote about here and here), has been conserved and is now ready for prime time.

The Maine panorama, unlike the St. Louis one, was thought to be lost. As you’ll read below, it had disappeared from view for 100 years and was rediscovered only in 1996. It’s quite beautiful, judging by pictures, and was created by Edward Harrison May (1824-1887) and Joseph Kyle (1815-1863) and designed by some notable artists (see below).

Now, “For the first time since the 1860s, the entire historic panorama—800 feet of vibrantly painted muslin canvas, in four sections—will be on view in two downtown locations, the Saco Museum and the historic Pepperell Mills.”  That comes after 15 years of research and restoration, partly funded with a Save America’s Treasures grant.

Here is its backstory, from the museum:

The Moving Panorama of Pilgrim’s Progress illustrates, in a way that no other work of art has done before or since, a moment when ideas about faith, art, and landscape all traveled along the same narrow highway in the course of American life. Also known as Bunyan’s Tableau, it was created in 1851 and presented to audiences nationwide throughout the second half of the 19th century. … Panoramas were presented by scrolling the massive canvas paintings across a stage, accompanied by narration and music. John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, on which this panorama is based, was also a sensation in its time and beyond. Written in 1678 England, it achieved a peak of popularity in 19th-century America, where it became a huge influence upon literature and religion. The Moving Panorama of Pilgrim’s Progress was one of the most important moving panoramas in the United States, an exceptional example of this genre of painting that bridged high art and popular culture.

It was conceived by members of the National Academy of Design in New York, with designs contributed by Hudson River School masters Frederic Edwin Church, Jasper Cropsey, Daniel Huntington, and others.

In this way, it relates directly to the developing national school of landscape painting. After its final performance in York County, Maine, the Moving Panorama of Pilgrim’s Progress spent many years in a Biddeford barn and was ultimately given to the York Institute (now the Saco Museum) in 1896.  The panorama was forgotten as the museum’s location moved from building to building, and was periodically closed for wartime uses, throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was not until 1996…that the panorama was rediscovered in the museum’s storage vault.  It was this discovery that prompted the panorama’s partial conservation—approximately one fourth was treated—and exhibition tour in 1999. This current project completes the conservation work begun two decades ago, treating and exhibiting the panorama in its entirety and exploring innovative new strategies to make this immense masterpiece of 19th century American art accessible to audiences and scholars worldwide.

There’s much more here about the restoration in the press release, and the Saco Museum has also created a website for the panorama, where it has posted a film about the project, and a blog. The museum has also scheduled a day-long public symposium on September 21-22, 2012.

I’m hoping the piece, which is on view through Nov. 12, creates a lot of excitement in Maine. Saco is a small town, with fewer than 20,000 people, though it gets a lot of summer tourists.

Photo Credits: Courtesy of the Saco Museum

 

“Inductive Optimism” Or A Real Discovery? — UPDATED

Could there possibly be a trove of 100 unknown Caravaggio drawings and maybe a painting or two? Some Italian researchers say so. That caused an immediate storm of incredulity.

Here’s the story: Last week, art historians Maurizio Bernardelli Curuz,  artistic director of the Brescia Museum Foundation, and Adriana Conconi Fedrigolli, his colleagure, announced their find and said they were publishing their work in a two-volume, 477-page e-book entitled Young Caravaggio – One hundred rediscovered works, supposedly available on Amazon, but I couldn’t find it either here or on the UK site. (True, one story I read said “will publish,” so maybe it’s forthcoming.)

They said they discovered the sketches in a collection of paintings and drawings from the workshop of Simone Peterzano which has been held in a castle in Milan, Castello Sforzesco, since 1924, after they were transferred there from a nearby church. Caravaggio was an apprentice to Peterzano in his youth, as were other Italian painters. The Peterzano archive contains 1,378 paintings and drawings by the master and his students, and Curuz and Fedrigolli say it’s unlikely than some are not by Caravaggio. So they set to work to find them.

However, doubt was cast when other art historians said the pair had not studied the sketches in person, but rather used photographs to make identifications. It surely didn’t help that someone in the early articles had already placed a value on them — some 700 million euros.  

But while, according to the Daily Telegraph, “Their research was praised as “intelligent” by Claudio Strinati, a prominent expert in 16th-century art and an authority on Caravaggio,” others disagreed. For example:

Dr John T. Spike, a Caravaggio expert at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, said the quality of the sketches was better than Caravaggio’s earliest known work, Boy Peeling Fruit, painted in 1592.

“The sketches from the collection show robust, competent drawing, yet in Caravaggio’s earliest painting he was struggling to draw competently,” he told The Daily Telegraph. “How could he have gone backwards in terms of his artistic skill?”

The American press hasn’t given much coverage to the claims, but I’d venture that’s partly because they show so little interest in art (as opposed to the art market). Reuters picked it up and published something yesterday, dousing the claim with cold water. The AP, too, showed restraint and disbelief, writing:

Among the prominent skeptics was Antonio Paolucci, the director of the Vatican Museums and one of Italy’s most esteemed art historians and restoration experts, who pointed out that many experts have seen the drawing and “not one of those experts had come up with the name of Caravaggio.”

Paolucci described the claim as “pure inductive optimism” in the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano on Friday, though he acknowledged it was always possible that “researchers with lesser credentials but with an especially gifted eye, sensitivity and also luck” had pinpointed something new.

Sounds right to me.

UPDATE, 7/11: No wonder I couldn’t find the book mentioned above on Amazon’s website: The Telegraph is now reporting that the book has been withdrawn. It said:

…Stefano Boeri, a cultural official with Milan city council, announced the launching of an investigation to ascertain “the correctness of the procedures regarding the publication” of the e-book.

A panel of heritage experts from Castello Sforzesco, the castle where the archive of sketches and drawings is kept, would scrutinise “with rigour the ideas advanced by the authors of the e-book,” he said….

Uh-oh.

Photo: Supper at Emmaus, from the National Gallery collection in London

Catching Up With The Berlin Gemaeldegalerie Situation

The Association of German Art Historians has written an even stronger petition against the planned “irresponsible” move of Berlin’s Old Master painting collections out of the Gemaeldegalerie and into the Bode Museum, partly, plus much more into storage than the one I’ve written about before. Here’s one paragraph from it:

To put it bluntly: Bode’s vision of showing painting and sculpture together cannot be used to gloss over the disappearance into storage of large parts of the Gemäldegalerie collection of Old Master paintings. We also consider the token solution proposed in official statements, namely to stage rotating presentations of the works that the Bode Museum is far too small to house, as irresponsible on conservation grounds. Would such a solution be conceivable in the newly redesigned Louvre? What would Bode have said about it?!

So far, 4,154 German art historians have signed on. The link above includes an English translation. Meanwhile, the petition launched here in the U.S. has 6,363 signatures. But Jeffrey Hamburger, the Harvard art historian who created it, today wrotes to supporters:

At the rate of ca. 850/day, we have done quite well. We need, however, to do more. Just think: if each of you recruited one additional person to sign, we’d have close to 12,000. Two more, close to 20,000. With a little effort, we can greatly magnify the impact of our common cause. Now is not the time to sit back, but rather to redouble our efforts.

Authorities in Berlin have taken notice of the petitions, but apparently claim that no one goes to see the Old Master paintings. Nonetheless, they are being forced to respond and, as someone put it recently, their thoughts are “evolving.”

Sign here.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Gemaeldegalerie

Just back …

Dear Readers,

I have just returned from a quick trip to Mexico City. I’ll be posting again as soon as I catch up on things that happened while I was away.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives