• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Uncategorized

Another Defection From Indianapolis

The hard-hit Indianapolis Museum of Art lost another curator: Rebecca Long, currently Associate Curator of European Painting and Sculpture before 1800 at IMA, is moving to the Art Institute of Chicago. There, she will be the Associate Curator in the Department of Medieval to Modern European Painting and Sculpture, responsible for Italian and Spanish painting and sculpture before 1750.

RebeccaLong9-16-13Long will join AIC on Feb. 27, 2015.

After IMA’s other losses, this is a blow. There, she “spearheaded work on the forthcoming catalogue of the museum’s Clowes Collection, offering the first scholarly and technical analysis of that important collection of masterworks of the Italian, Spanish, Netherlandish and German schools.”

Long’s background, per the AIC:

A native of Pennsylvania, Long has held research fellowships at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies at Villa I Tatti, Florence, where she conducted research on 16th century Italian paintings in the IMA collection. Additional research she’s done has illuminated the work of itinerant artists, patronage in Italy and Spain as well as international markets for art of the early modern period. She has a B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh, with concentrations in art history and business administration, and a master’s degree from the Institute of Fine Arts at New York University, where she is currently pursuing a Ph.D. Her dissertation focuses on the role of Italian art and artists at the Spanish court in the early 17th century.

IMA hired Long in 2008.

 

Another Director’s Job Opens Up

While you were holiday shopping (maybe) on Friday, news broke that Susan L. Talbott will retire as director and C.E.O. of the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford. There’s no sign that anything is amiss, but up in Hartford–which has dismisssed or lost a few directors in recent years because of board relations and expectations–you never know.

SusanTalbotAnd she did say. “Looking ahead, I am eager to explore a different chapter in my life and career”–which isn’t quite “leaving to spend more time with my family,” but….

Talbott took over the museum in 2008 and plans to leave next fall, after a $33 million renovation, which upgraded and expanded the museum’s galleries, reopen.

Here’s how the museum recapped her career there:

Taking charge of a museum that needed repair and modernization, Talbott first tackled deferred maintenance and restoration of the Wadsworth Atheneum’s historic buildings…Connecticut awarded the Wadsworth Atheneum the remaining funds needed to complete its $33 million renovation, increasing public gallery space by more than 25% without any new construction. [She]…significantly increased efficiencies via the installation of a proprietary power plant and new HVAC system, as well as a state-of-the-art storage facility….Talbott also built a strong, competent staff of curatorial and administrative professionals, strengthening the core of personnel charged with continuing forward momentum into the future.

Talbott also took steps early in her tenure to increase and diversify the visitor pool while working to retain the museum’s core supporters, deepening the museum’s roots and broadening its reach into the local community….

Well, perhaps. But I’ve been disappointed by the exhibition schedule there, which I found somewhat mediocre –e.g., the coming show focusing on Coney Island–given the Atheneum’s illustrious history.

On the other hand, several acquisitions were good, such as: “…a generous gift from her friend and internationally renowned artist Richard Tuttle, titled, “Formal Narration”; the 2014 purchase of Artemisia Gentileschi’s masterpiece, “Self-Portrait as a Lute Player,” which will be unveiled to the public for the first time in 2015; a major bequest of Arts and Crafts furniture and decorative art by collector Stephen Gray; and purchases of important works by Georgia O’Keeffe, Martin Puryear, Sean Scully, Kiki Smith and Kara Walker.”

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Wadsworth Atheneum

Freer-Sackler Digitization Project: A Modest Suggestion

The other day, the Freer and Sackler Galleries of the Smithsonian announced that it had digitized its entire collection and was putting it all online for all to see and use–with more than 90 percent of the images in high-definition resolution and without copyright restrictions for noncommercial uses–as of Jan. 1, 2015. This is good news, and I applaud the initiative.

TextileCapture-1But another sentence in the press release stopped me: “The vast majority of the 40,000 artworks have never before been seen by the public…”

Now, I know full well that many museums own works whose quality isn’t up to par–and they should not displace better works, just to be shown. I am also fully aware that some museums keep works for study–and the Freer-Sackler is one of them. The release says there are more than 10,000 items in the Freer Stufy Collection, including multiple pages of certain manuscripts, textile fragments and the like. This collection is “used by scholars around the world for scientific research and reference.” I tend to like the open storage areas some museums are using for some collections, though I have no information about what the public thinks about them.

But I think museum should make use of some items they “never” show. Are any lendable to smaller museums? Could any be pulled into a small touring exhibition? If so, museums should do these things.

And if not, why not devote a small area–even one case or one small wall–for a rotating showing of artworks that are “never” shown? Maybe these items could be paired with something similar that is worthy of hanging in the galleries. Would that help teach the public some connoisseurship?  It might even prove enlightening about deaccessioning.

Museums have become so creative at trying new things, they seem to say to us. How about trying something with works in their storeroom? Maybe they would even turn up some wonderful. There’ve been a lot of cases like that in recent years.

Photo Credit: Hutomo Wicaksono /Freer and Sackler Galleries

Portland’s Masterworks: Looking Back And Forward

On Saturday, the Portland Art Museum in Oregon opened a new “Masterworks” exhibition, of El Greco’s Holy Family With Saint Mary Magdalen, which is being lent by the Cleveland Museum of Art. It’s the fifth show in this series, and I love the idea of borrowing and focusing attention on one artwork. The El Greco “Masterworks” was preceded by Raphael’s La Velata, Thomas Moran’s Shoshone Falls, Titian’s La Bella and Francis Bacon’s recording-breaking triptych, Three Studies of Lucian Freud.

I think I’ve written about all of them here, for one reason or another.

ElGreco_HolyFamilyThis time, I decided to ask Brian Ferriso, Portland’s director about the series. I’ll give you his answers verbatim.

What are your overarching thoughts about this series?

I continue to be excited about the opportunities that these projects present. It allows us to focus on why art museums exist—the power and centrality of the object—and more specifically to explore the many facets of a celebrated picture.

Are they easy to arrange, and must you usually lend something in return?

Easy is relative. It requires negotiations, relationships and clarity of purpose, among other things. They always require some effort and planning and each loan requires a different level of negotiation and/or discussions. The El Greco is an exchange and we negotiated it to coincide with the 400th anniversary of this death and of the holidays. We made sure the picture is exhibited through the December holidays and Easter.

Do they draw a lot of people, or just art-lovers, or just people who’d be in the museum anyway?

They draw a wonderful mix. We have seen people come specifically for the Masterworks or they have run into it when they are visiting other exhibits. Additionally, we program them, allowing educational programs to expand on the content. I continue to love these projects because we can place them in various locations of the museum and in doing so amplify our collection. Titian, Raphael and El Greco increase the attention and dialogue around our Renaissance collections. The Moran brought attention to our Moran, Bierstadt, Weirs and Hassams, among others. And the Bacon was an introduction to our entire modern and contemporary wing.

The El Greco has been special, like some of the others, because we have exhibited it during the holidays, a time when many of our visitors are looking for that extra special reason to come to the museum and/or when I am at many holiday-related events at which our community asks. “What’s new?” and with the Masterworks I always have an answer!

Do you have a schedule of these or are they all targets of opportunity? 

Both. I have a few targets and we are in discussions for future loans. Also, I (we) are opportunistic. I would categorize the Raphael, Moran and El Greco as targeted and the Bacon and Titian as more opportunistic. There are nuances to all of these, so ultimately it is not as straightforward as I have classified. Ideally, my goal is to have one every 12 to 18 months in order to maintain the momentum.

They are always treated as “special” with a commensurate level of gallery presentation, enhanced interpretation, marketing, banners and press releases, and opportunities for press and donors—viewing the crate being opened, lectures and special interviews with the curator and/or director, etc.

Any advice for other museums that want to do this?

As Oregon-based Nike would say, “JUST DO IT!”

***

I do agree, as you’ve probably guessed. Ferriso wrote an article on these exhibition that was published in 2013, here’s the link to “The Power of the Masterwork.”

Portland is not alone in single-work exhibitions. The Detroit Institute of Art is currently featuring Water Lilly Pond, Green Harmony, by Monet, on loan from the Musee d’Orsay in its “Guest of Honor” program, to name just one.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Cleveland Museum of Art via the Portland Art Museum

Restoration Scandal At Chartres Cathedral

Who was it that said one look at Chartres Cathedral turned him into an art historian? Or art-lover for life? Henry Adams? Bernard Berenson? I can’t remember, but it was probably more than one person. Kenneth Clark called it “one of the two most beautiful covered spaces in the world” (Hagia Sophia in Istanbul being the other).

Chartres-cathedral-restorations_jpg_250x600_q85Maybe not anymore. Hear what Martin Filler, writing on the website of The New York Review of Books, has to say after a recent visit:

Carried away by the splendors of the moment, I did not initially realize that something was very wrong. I had noticed the floor-to-ceiling scrim-covered scaffolding near the crossing of the nave and transepts, but had assumed it was routine maintenance. But my more attentive wife, the architectural historian Rosemarie Haag Bletter—who as a Columbia doctoral candidate took courses on Romanesque sculpture with the legendary Meyer Schapiro and Gothic architecture with the great medievalist Robert Branner—immediately noticed that large areas of the sanctuary’s deep gray limestone surface had been painted.

The first portion she pointed out was a pale ochre wall patterned with thin, perpendicular white lines mimicking mortar between masonry blocks. Looking upward we then saw panels of blue faux marbre, high above them gilded column capitals and bosses (the ornamental knobs where vault ribs intersect), and, nearby, floor-to-ceiling piers covered in glossy yellow trompe l’oeil marbling, like some funeral parlor in Little Italy.

I haven’t seen this first-hand, obviously, but it sounds like a mess. Take a look at the top photo–that’s what is underway. I couldn’t find an exact parallel picture on the web (though there may well be one), so I posted something similar from Chartres.

What is this impulse to make everything new–even if it is a wrong-headed attempt to restore to the original? I’m not against conservation by any means, but this one does surely seem wrong.

I also agree with another of Filler’s points: “why had we heard nothing about [this] before?” It is, after all, a UNESCO World Heritage site. Where was the French press? Where was the European art press? Or did they cover it, and we missed it?

Filler says this effort dates to 2009, when the French culture ministry set out to “do no less than repaint the entire interior in bright whites and garish colors that are intended to return the sanctuary to its medieval state. This sweeping program to “reclaim” Chartres from its allegedly anachronistic gloom is supposed to be completed in 2017.”

chartres-cathedral-view-from-labyrinthHere’s what’s wrong with that:

The belief that a heavy-duty reworking can allow us see the cathedral as its makers did is not only magical thinking but also a foolhardy concept that makes authentic artifacts look fake. To cite only one obvious solecism, the artificial lighting inside the present-day cathedral—which no one has suggested removing—already makes the interiors far brighter than they were during the Middle Ages, and thus we can be sure that the painted walls look nothing like they would have before the advent of electricity.

Furthermore, the exact chemical components of the medieval pigments remain unknown. The original paint is thought to have flaked off within a few generations and not been replaced, so for most of the building’s eight-century history it has not been experienced with painted surfaces. The emerging color scheme now allows a direct, and deeply disheartening, before-and-after comparison.

He has many more details, disheartening ones, plus another picture or two of the repainted areas.

But, alas, this seems unstoppable. If you have not already been to Chartres, and luckily I have, it may be too late.

 

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives