• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

People

Timken Intrigue, Part 2: The Power Play

If a dispute isn’t about money, it’s usually about power. And that is what appears to be behind the problems at the Timken Museum of Art (below). Not programs, not old-school art versus contemporary art, not money.

When we last wrote about the Timken, we weren’t quite sure whether director John Wilson quit or was pushed out or why. It’s not quite true that the board disagreed with Wilson’s strategy, as several people including me surmised. Wilson has done a fine job. Attendance when he took over in 2008 was about 143,000. Last year, it was 197,000. Wilson added context to the collection of Old Masters, American paintings, and icons with exhibits: putting works by Gabriel Orozco in among the Russian icons because he used similar techniques; mounting the Robert Wilson Video Portraits show to illustrate that Wilson drew inspiration from Old Masters, to name two. But my sources say those shows did not ruffle the feathers of the board.

TimkenEven if they did, they drew audience. And Wilson’s best effort hasn’t yet happened: he has arranged for the Timken to borrow a Vermeer from the Rijksmuseum and a Raphael from the National Gallery in London for the Timken’s anniversary celebration next year. Not everyone can do that!

Meanwhile, the endowment, after losing value in the recession, is back to where it was, at about $25 million. Admission is free, but Wilson increased voluntary contributions — just by asking for them and putting a dollar amount at the contribution box (first $5, then $10) — to about $5,000 a month. For a museum with a budget about $2 million a year, that’s a noteworthy amount.

The problem was, Tim Zinn — who moved from trustee to president in 2012 — had other ideas. He wanted Wilson to continue his curatorial duties, but he also wanted to return to the Timken’s old governance structure, my sources say.

Walter Ames, who was the lawyer for the Putnam sisters, whose collection formed the Timken (they were kin to the Timkens), used to run the museum with “visiting directors.” They included, my sources say, Agnes Mongan and AB de Vries, t he retired director of the Mauritshuis. Thus Ames was able to run the museum himself. He passed that power to his daughter and grandson, Nancy Peterson and John Peterson (who I’m told never wanted the job and committed suicide).

Zinn, I’m told, likes that model. He is president, but not CEO, of Ceretec, “a privately held corporation developing and producing innovative, cutting-edge medical devices and pharmaceutical products.” Zinn wanted to make the decisions and, when Wilson wouldn’t go along, he made clear to Wilson that his contract, which was up in mid-August, would not be renewed. So Wilson quit as of July 1.

Zinn reached out to David Bull, 80, to become “visiting director” because Bull is on the Timken’s advisory board — another way the museum tapped curatorial help in the past without having its own.

But Bull, I’m told, has no intention of leaving New York and will in fact simply visit the museum on occasion. Wilson was a member of AAMD, but I doubt the Timken’s new arrangement qualifies for the AAMD’s museum standards rule that “The museum must be administered by a professional staff.”

This is no way to run a museum.

 

Intrique: Director of Timken Museum Is Out

This Wednesday, John Wilson, Executive Director of the Timken Museum of Art in San Diego, is set to give a gallery talk titled “Brave New World: from Icons to the Future.” As I write this, that’s what the museum website says.

John-Wilson-Timken-MuseumIt may be a broken link by the time you read this post, though, because Wilson (pictured at right) quit or was pushed out last week, just before the holiday. His name has been removed from the Board/Staff page of the site, though his replacement’s name isn’t yet there. That would be, according to various reports, David Bull, the well-known conservator and expert on Old Master paintings. Bull is founder and president of the Fine Art Conservation & Restoration in New York and paintings conservator at the National Gallery of Art.

Bull, who is 80, has been named “visiting director,” which is new title to me. Wilson is 58. I’m not an ageist, but something is going on there.

The Timken is a small museum known for it collections of European old master paintings, American paintings, and Russian icons. Wilson has been director for six years, and was, according to the Times of San Diego, “the first professional art historian with extensive museum experience to hold the position.” 

Both sides have remained circumspect, but it looks to me as if the board disagreed with Wilson’s strategy for the museum. According to the San Diego Union-Tribune,

Wilson said he was hired to bring change to the museum. During his tenure, he brought in innovative exhibits that provided context for the Timken’s Old Masters collection, among them a cutting-edge Robert Wilson video portrait exhibit and the current installation “El Lissitzky: Futurist Portfolios.”

In the past year, attendance for the museum, which is the only free museum in Balboa Park, reached a record 200,000 visitors and fundraising also increased substantially. Among Wilson’s goals was to make the Timken a partner and a player in San Diego’s cultural community, and the museum, in collaboration with the San Diego Museum of Art and the Museum of Contemporary Art Diego, was instrumental in the first ever cooperative effort between the three museums, “Behold America!”

But the U-T quotes Wilson saying: “The board had a model of the Timken that is similar to when John Petersen was here. So it’s time for a change.” And what was that?  The paper says that Peterson was the grandson of Walter Ames, the Timken’s founder, and the son of Ames’ daughter, Nancy Petersen, who was the museum’s first formal director. John Petersen ascended to director in 1996 but died in 2006. Wilson succeeded him. 

And the U-T notes: “Replacing a director, who is a first rate curator, with a visiting director, who is a first-rate conservator, speaks to the museum’s current priorities.”

The Times wrote:

…Paige Nordeen, a museum spokeswoman, [said:] “David will be guiding the institution through San Diego’s 2015 centennial celebrations in Balboa Park and coincides with the museum’s 50th anniversary celebration, and he will be leading several planning sessions over the next month.”

She also used the code word that Wilson was leaving “to pursue other opportunities,” even as the U-T has Wilson saying  “he had no immediate plans, and at least for now, is looking forward to working on some research projects, and will likely stay in San Diego.”

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Timken

First View: A Pre-Opening At The Clark

The Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute has set its Grand Re-opening for July 4, but since last week, director Michael Conforti and his team have been showing it off to the press, officials of other museums, donors and other powers-that-be. I was there last Friday afternoon, with much of the other press (but I did not stay for the evening festivities or for the Saturday events).

The project started with a master plan in 2001, and involved other openings and changes over the years — which I am not going to relate here. At the moment, the Clark is unveiling its new visitors center, special exhibition galleries, renovation of the original museum building and reinstallation of its permanent collection, a lot of landscaping and more. Tadao Ando was architect of the new building, which beautifully attaches to the original museum, where Annabelle Selldorf did the honors renovating the old museum. Some work, on the Manton Research Center, which used to hold the special exhibition galleries, remains to be completed. You can find out details on the architecture initiatives here.

ClarkView

Interestingly, most of the pictures I’ve seen are of this view, which is of the new Visitor Center across the new reflecting pool. The old museum is off to the right.

I’m going to give the Clark an A, but not an A-plus. Both Ando and Selldorf did marvelous jobs. The lower-level and ground floor galleries (now filled with “Cast for Eternity” (a show of Chinese bronzes)  in the new building are wonderful, and flexible, and the public spaces — cafe, museum store, information areas are all beautiful, functional and mostly welcoming. One slight misfire: the “living room” area joining the old and the new has a cold feel to me — very gray in all aspects (see below) — but I am not sure how I’d warm it up.

AcademicSelldorf made the old building better, turning long corridors filled with art into a series of real, nicely-sized and proportioned galleries filled with art. More art is out, including some loans. Someone said the galleries look the same, only better, and that’s about right. I love that the first gallery visitors is is filled with paintings by Winslow Homer — they stare right at West Point, Prout’s Neck, which is hung in the center of the facing wall. In the last iteration, the first painting visitors saw in the permanent collection was John Singer Sargent’s Fumée d’ambre gris (Smoke of Ambergris), which is now in the Academic Gallery (at right).

Plus, the groupings, juxtapositions, revealing viewpoints and dialogues among the paintings make for an excellent hanging (e.g., see the photo below, which I have over-exposed to show how the Renoir nude and the Bougereau nude can be seen and compared from across the gallery).

So what’s wrong? While I was talking with Conforti — who is to be congratulated for his vision — he did say one thing that bothered me. That was, the Clark is now a community center, and if people want to come and use the grounds, eat at the cafe, play with the waterfall, shop in the store, etc., that was fine with him. Well, to me, that depends. People have always walked the grounds of the Clark, and that’s fine with me too. But if they are coming to the “museum,” they ought to see some art, no?

I proposed the addition of one outdoor sculpture, and Conforti conceded that they’d considered it — and may yet do it. So as not to distract from the emphasis on nature at the Clark, I suggested a Roxy Paine. Conforti was right to say that too many other museums have placed a Paine on their grounds. Rather, he considered a bronze tree by Giuseppi Penone, which would be fine by me. James Turrell is also going to visit, and may do a skyspace, and Janet Cardiff was there Friday to scout out a possible sound installation.

But there are plenty of other options. I just want visitors who don’t go into the galleries to know that they are at a museum. Always, the art comes first, then the other things.

For those who want more information, here is the Clark Expansion Fact Sheet. And I’ve posted a few more of my photos from Friday below (from my iPhone, so not always the best quality).

JSS

Rodins

DecArts

Nudes

LoungeBronzes

Photo Credits: © Judith H. Dobrzynski  

Another Great Job Opens Up — In London

Surprise: today Nicholas Penny, director of the National Gallery, said he was stepping down from his job next year, as soon as a successor can be found. Penny will be 65 then, and according to The Telegraph, he plans to “spend more time with ‘family, friends and books’.”  Penny became the NG’s director in 2008.

nicholaspennyjpg_2826541bOften, when the “spend more time with family” reason is used, something else is amiss — and it means the person was fired. That doesn’t seem to be the case here, but never say never.

Yet, as The Telegraph continued:

It will also bring to an end the most successful period in the National Gallery’s history.

Last year, annual visitor numbers topped six million for the first time. The 2011 Leonardo da Vinci exhibition was the most visited show ever to be staged at the London gallery.

Penny’s departure means that both Britain’s National Portrait Gallery, where Sandy Nairn announced his imminent departure recently, and the NG are in need of new directors — big shoes to fill.

I’ve often praised Penny (here, here and here)  for taking controversial stands. Interestingly, Richard Dorment, The Telegraph‘s art critic, wrote today that

The only surprising thing about Nicholas Penny’s announcement that he is to retire in 2015 after six years as Director of the National Gallery is that he lasted as long as he did. Penny is among the most distinguished scholars and gifted curators of his generation, the author of a seemingly endless stream of books, articles and catalogues on all aspects of Renaissance art. Since people like him are usually too sensible to want to direct museums, when news broke that he was to leave his post as curator of sculpture at the National Gallery in Washington to take up an appointment at Trafalgar Square the museum and gallery world roared its approval.

And I too was delighted, though puzzled that anyone would want trade his extraordinarily successful career in Washington for the thankless job of directing a national institution in this country.

Dorment goes on to give his reasons, here.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of The Telegraph

VMFA Poached For Another Top Job — And More News From the Met

sylvia-yount-bioThe Metropolitan Museum of Art* just announced the appointment of  Sylvia L. Yount as head of the American Wing. Yount is currently Chief Curator and head of the American Art department at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, which just last week lost Deputy Director for Art & Education Robin Nicholson. He’s taking over the Frick Art & Historical Center in Pittsburgh.

This is obviously not good news for the VMFA, or its director Alex Nyerges — whose name itself has been bruited for a couple of the open directorships around the country. He is generally perceived to have done a good job there.

Yount succeeds Morrison H. Heckscher, who’ll retire at the end of this month.

Yount’s bio includes stints as curator of American Art and department head at the High Museum in Atlanta, and curator of collections and chief curator at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. She has organized “landmark exhibitions on American modernism, Maxfield Parrish, and Cecilia Beaux” and “has strengthened and diversified VMFA’s American holdings through purchases and gifts. She has also presented exhibitions of work by the Anglo-American printmaker Clare Leighton and the celebrated African American modernist Jacob Lawrence. Currently, she is organizing a reappraisal of the Colonial Revival phenomenon, Making America: Myth, Memory, Identity.”

The Met’s director Tom Campbell also announced several promotions yesterday:

* Carrie Rebora Barratt as Deputy Director for Collections and Administration;
* Christine Coulson as Chief Advisor to the Director;
* Luke Syson as Iris and B. Gerald Cantor Chairman of the Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts;
* Lisa Pilosi as Sherman Fairchild Conservator in Charge of the Department of Objects Conservation; and
* Jeffrey S. Spar as Vice President for Technology and Chief Technology Officer.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the VMFA

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives