• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Museums

Philbrook Launches A Satellite With High Hopes

Sometimes, but not all that often, a museum satellite does make sense. Later this week, we’ll see the opening of one that does. Friday is opening day for Philbrook Downtown, an industrial space in the Brady Arts District of Tulsa that the museum is turning into a new arts center.

PhilbrookDowntownThe Philbrook itself, a villa built in the 1920s on a 23-acre site, makes for a lovely house museum, with spacious rooms and wide corridors. I visited about seven years ago, and was impressed with the overall feel (though I don’t remember any masterpieces). And I loved the grounds and garden.

But it’s true that modern, contemporary art and Native American art probably don’t look their best there. They’ll go into the new building, for which architect Richard Gluckman has taken an early 20th-century industrial warehouse and turned it into an art center of 30,000 sq. ft. Contemporary art and new media will go on the first floor, and Native American art will go upstairs. Near those galleries will go the Eugene B. Adkins Study Center, which “integrates Philbrook’s outstanding artwork, special collections from the  Museum’s H. A. & Mary K. Chapman Library, and Eugene Adkins’s personal archives.” I’m not sure what that means, but we’ll find out.

According to the Tulsa World:

The inaugural exhibits for Philbrook Downtown will be “Opening Abstraction” – abstract paintings and sculpture from 1945 to the present drawn from the permanent collection, on display on the first floor – and “Identity and Inspiration: 20th Century Native American Art,” which presents items from the museum’s extensive holdings of American Indian art in a uniquely thematic way in the main gallery space on the second floor.

Also on display in the smaller galleries will be “Adolph Gottlieb: Sculptor,” showcasing a little-seen facet of the work of this pioneering abstract artist, and “Sirens of the Southwest,” featuring works by influential women artists who lived and worked in this region of the country, including Georgia O’Keeffe.

The addition also gets the Philbrook, which can seem a little remote, into Tulsa’s downtown, which I recall as full of art deco buildings and touches. That is likely to mean a new audience, patrons of the existing Brady Arts District, an old section of Tulsa that claims to be “rich with cultural icons such as the Cain’s Ballroom and the Ole Lady on Brady. The buildings in the area that are still standing are primarily red brick and have been utilized as warehouses.” Over the past 20 years, it has gentrified and attracted new cultural institutions.

So while I think some satellites don’t add much more than costs — and it’s harder to manage two spaces than one — the Philbrook Downtown seems to add a new dimension and to have a real purpose, not just expansion. Let’s see how it all turns out.

Meantime, here’s what NewsOn6 in Tulsa is saying and check out the slide show with the Tulsa World article.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Philbrook

 

 

University of Iowa Museum Takes A Step Forward

Iowa is again experiencing spring floods, which reminds us that five years have passed since the devastating 2008 deluge. Coincidentally, yesterday, the Iowa Board of Regents voted to give the University of Iowa permission to plan for a new museum to replace the one inundated in 2008.

UofIowaMuseumTo recap events: The museum’s collection, which includes Jackson Pollock’s Mural, was moved ahead of the 2008 floods and now resides at the Figge Art Museum in nearby Davenport. But when the university applied for funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to rebuild in a new location, away from the floodplain, the request was denied. FEMA said that since the existing — and flooded — museum (at right) wasn’t more than 50 percent damaged, it did not qualify for federal funding for a new building — just renovations. But the university could not get insurance on the collection, valued at some $500 million, in the old location on the Iowa River.

Despite many appeals, which were exhausted last March, the University could not convince FEMA to pay up.

Now, according to the Associated Press,

…The university said it will study a range of potential sites for the museum near its campus in Iowa City and options for funding the building through donations and partnerships with the private sector. While the project is still years from completion, the approval for planning by the Iowa Board of Regents gives hope that the university’s art collection of 12,400 paintings, sculptures and other objects will one day return to campus…

…[University treasurer Douglas]  True said the university plans to pursue a “public-private partnership” for the new building, which could be used to display the collection and for other purposes. He said the university would soon send out “a request for information” to developers who may have ideas on where the building could be located and how it might be financed and operated….

…The university has not set a price tag for the building, and told the regents that the amount of university funding provided for construction and operation will depend “upon the nature of the financial ownership.” In the past, the school has said a new museum could cost $75 million.

The old museum, which now serves a few other functions including those of the music school, was again evacuated this week, threatened by flooding.

 Photo Credit: Courtesy of the AP

A Big — Very Mixed — Day For Washington Museums

Well, it was a bizarre day for Washington museums. First, late morning, the Smithsonian Institution killed the Hirshhorn Bubble — officially, as we all know that this has been coming for weeks if not months. (More about this in a minute.)

9012 Lot 12 A Sickle-Leaf carpetThen, this afternoon, the Corcoran laid an egg: The carpet it decided to deaccession, estimated by Sotheby’s to fetch $5- to $7 million, actually brought $33.8 million, including the buyer’s premium. The so-called “important and revered 17th century Clark Sickle-Leaf Carpet” set a new world auction record for any carpet “by a significant margin,” Sotheby’s said, and also establishes a new record for any Islamic work of art at auction. Indeed, that price was more than three times the previous record for any carpet, Sotheby’s expert Mary Jo Otsea, the auctioneer and the senior consultant, rugs & carpets, said in the press release.  It added: ‘ At least four bidders fought for over 10 minutes for the star lot.”

Corcoran trustees may be rejoicing at their windfall, but one has to ask, why again was the Corcoran selling a crown jewel? Another lot, btw, the The Lafões Carpet, also from Persia, was purchased for $4.6 million, against a pre-sale estimate of $800,000 to $1.2 million.

All told, the Corcoran was selling 25 carpets from the collection of William A. Clark, and every one of them sold. The grand total was $43.8 million. Now the Corcoran, despite the financial straits it is in, says it will use the money for its acquisitions fund, as directed by museum ethics rule. Sotheby’s did not identify the buyers, but chances are we will not see these carpets again in the public domain.

It’s too bad that some deal could not have been made to keep these carpets in the collection of a museum: The Textile Museum in D.C. is opening a new building in partnership with George Washington University next year, and that would have been a nice home.

Now, back to the Hirschhorn: As I wrote here in mid-March, director Richard Koshalek’s “dream of erecting an Inflatable Seasonal Structure at the Hirshhorn for programming and creating a culural think-tank, is all but dead” and that was a follow-up to a February post in which I said: “If I had to guess now, I’d say it’s over.” The board has been divided about this bubble for some time, as I related then.

Significantly, it was the Smithsonian,  not the Hirshhorn, that made the announcement that it “will not move forward with plans for the Hirshhorn’s Seasonal Inflatable Structure, known as the Bubble.” Richard Kurin, the Under Secretary for History, Art, and Culture, put his name to it, but it was clearly Secretary Wayne Clough’s call. Here’s the party line:

The decision to suspend the project was made by Kurin and Smithsonian Secretary Wayne Clough following consultation with the Smithsonian Board of Regents, the Hirshhorn’s Board of Trustees, museum staff, art museum directors inside and outside the Smithsonian, budget officers and others. The Hirshhorn’s board met May 23 and was unable to reach consensus on the Bubble; it made no recommendation to the museum director about proceeding with or canceling the project.

“Without the full support of the museum’s board and the funding in place for the fabrication and a viable plan for the operation of the Bubble, we believe it is irresponsible to go forward,” said Kurin. “Architects, artists and Smithsonian staff have praised the bold vision of a temporary bubble-shaped structure on the Mall, but after four years of planning and fundraising, there was not enough funding to construct the Bubble and, more importantly, to sustain programming for years to come.”

For once, when money spoke, it said the right thing. Although I did write about the idea dispassionately for The Wall Street Journal in 2010, I’ve always been a skeptic. Koshalek talked about his plans to create an “educational exchange” in the Bubble, in the belief that museums “have to curate the public spaces and educational programs as well as exhibitions.”

I think they have their hands full with the last two in that list. Well, not quite – museums should experiment, but starting a think tank, a cultural Davos, as Koshalek wanted, struck me as grandiose and not right for the Hirshhorn. Now what? It should go back to better execution of its main mission.

Oh, btw, Koshalek is leaving as of June 29, though he “will serve as an adviser to the Smithsonian until Aug. 31, advising on exhibitions, programming, acquisitions and curating public spaces.” Kurin appointed Kerry Brougher, the deputy director and chief curator of the museum, to be acting director starting June 30, while he leads “a nationwide search for a successor to Koshalek, who has served as Hirshhorn director since April 2009.”

Photo Credit: Courtesy of Sotheby’s

 

 

 

 

“Boston I Love” Hits It Mark At The MFA

mfa-memorial-day-wkdMemorial Day was last weekend, of course, but I want to catch up on a release that the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston put out a few days ago: over that miserable three-day weekend, weatherwise, a record number of people visited the museum — in part because it was free and an opportunity to show solidarity in the wake of the Patriot’s Day Boston Marathon bombing.  MFA staged a “Boston I Love” Community Weekend, which — while hardly a celebration — was an opportunity to commune with other Bostonians. It worked.

Says the release:

Of the 29,391 people who attended the event, 9,759 visited on Saturday, 10,373 on Sunday, and 9,259 on Monday.  The Museum, which was open each day from 10 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., welcomed an average of 1,400 people per hour—the most visitors per hour in nearly 50 years.

There were lines to get in — see the picture in the release — and while they were there, visitors contributed about $6,500 to The One Fund Boston.

As RCA readers know, the Metropolitan Museum has lent three paintings in support. Museum-goers joined in, with “several thousand visitors participat[ing] in the collage-making project “Boston I Love,” creating about a thousand pictures that illustrated the spirit of Boston. Works were hung near the glass wall of the Druker Family Pavilion Community Classroom in the Linde Family Wing for Contemporary Art.”

Another outpouring came from people all over the world in the form of more than 1,700 flags made in tribute to the people of Boston. They were hung in the museum’s courtyard, which when it opened a few years back was criticized by some as being cold and off-putting. Chihuly’s Lime Green Icicle Tower helped, but from afar it seems as if it had never looked better than last weekend:

BostonMFA-flags

I love it when an art museum proves its worth as a place people want to go for an uplifting experience.

Photo Credits: Courtesy of the MFA

 

First Impressions: The Met’s New European Paintings Galleries

When the Metropolitan Museum* opened its new Islamic wing in in 2011, more a million visitors flooded into it within 14 and a half months. I am sure that number must be hanging out there as, if not a goal for the new European paintings reinstallation, a possibility. Should they draw that many, fast? You bet they should. They are spectacular. The curators, led by Keith Christiansen, created a logical path through European art history with marvelous moments and juxtapositions. There’s no one path from gallery to gallery, and you’ll have to doubleback from time to time, but that’s the nature of the galleries.

1111Also, there is a guide, but since I was there for the opening, I did not pick it up.

Among the things I noticed on that first visit:

  • Bruegel’s Harvesters looks fresh and beautiful on a wall of its own.
  • Vermeer gets a room of his own, almost, with five of his paintings in one gallery that illuminate his range — from an early picture to one of his latest, from a religious allegory to two interiors with a figure, and a tronie. Christiansen says “That means that, in the Metropolitan’s collection, “you can encounter Vermeer from beginning to end, undertaking virtually all the kinds of pictures that he did,” something no other museum can claim, he adds. Fair enough, but maybe a slight exaggeration because the Met has nothing like View of Delft.
  • The Italian section — two suites leading off the first gallery — has never looked better, and rightly occupy the center of the galleries.
  • Depth in works by such artists as Giovanni di Paolo, Lucas Cranach the Elder, Goya, Rembrandt, Rubens, and other has never been more obvious, though a few holes are also inescapable: Raphael being a big one, as the Met has only an altarpiece donated by J.P. Morgan and a small panel that was once part of its base. We need a Madonna (badly).
  • Paintings, genres, artists you thought you knew — you will see with fresh eyes.
  • You’ll look at a painting, and wonder why you never noticed it before: to wit, I never recall seeing A Panoramic Landscape with a Country Estate by Philip Koninck (at right) before — though the Met has owned it since 1911. That’s just one examples of many.
  • The room with Flemish portraits has marvelous juxtapositions — one wall features several work with people whose hands are all posed in the same way until — near the end — the woman in a matched pair (by Memling as I recall, but I wasn’t taking notes) has hands placed in the opposite direction.
  • The atmospherics do well by the art: the galleries are all painted a rich grey, a unifying tactic, but one that does not deaden the paintings (as I think that beige does in the American paintings galleries).
  • A few fabulous acquisitions — notably a double-side painting by Hans Schäufelein, the Dormition of the Virgin and Christ Carrying the Cross.
  • Strategic loans — notably, in the first gallery, Orazio Gentileschi’s spectacular Danaë, lent by dealer Richard Feigen — number about two dozen, not so many as it sounds considering that more than 700 paintings are on view in this go-round.
  • Technology is used sparingly in the galleries, thankfully — for example, to explicate an altarpiece on one small screen.
  • Although there was talk of blending sculpture and decorative arts into these galleries, it is very spare — they are paintings galleries, with few departures, and they are good ones. Especially a 17th-century Amsterdam cabinet in a side room once used as a reading room.

2222Those are all first impressions, subject to change when I go back for more.

In the meantime, go, and if you can’t get there right away take a look at what the Met has put online:

  • Christiansen’s opening speech.
  • What he calls “tasting tours” — a somewhat silly way to describe six tours through the Italian, German, French, Dutch and Spanish galleries.
  • Four episodes in the 82nd and Fifth series of short videos, featuring works by Bassano, Tiepolo, El Greco, and Berlinghiero.

Photo credit: Courtesy of the Met (top)

*I consult to a foundation that supports the Met.

 

 

 

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives