• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Museums

Who Will Run the National Gallery? The Odds-On Favorite…UPDATED

The National Gallery in London was expected to announce a replacement for Nicholas Penny, the director, before Christmas, and I understand that the person has been chosen; the name must now simply go through political channels, with approval by Prime Minister David Cameron, before it can be announced.

GFinaldiOne thing is for sure, though: it’s not going to be Luke Syson, the curator of European sculpture and decorative arts at the Metropolitan Museum, who openly sought the job and, some sources tell me, thought he had it in the bag, thanks to his friendship with a trustee or two. Some weeks ago, according to several sources, Syson took himself out of the running. His interview apparently did not go well, for one thing, and I’ve heard that when he realized that he had no chance to get the job, he decided to withdraw and stay in New York, rather than return to the NG, where he had been Curator of Italian Paintings before 1500 and Head of Research. (Syson has been at the Met for two full years, and something of a disappointment to the many who expected him to produce a exhibit with some of the excitement of his last at the NG, Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan.)

So who will it be? There are two finalists*, Gabriele Finaldi, deputy director of the Prado in Madrid (despite the title, the job is essentially the director), and Taco Dibbits, director of collections at the Rijksmuseum. If Ladbrokes offered odds on this contest, Finaldi would pay less than Dibbits. That’s what I am hearing, again from numerous sources.

Aside from having spent 10 years at the NG as a curator, Finaldi has an edge because of his fabulous track record at the Prado. He was educated in the U.K. (Ph.D. from the Courtauld), knows the collection well, was seriously considered last time (when Penny got the job), and has many excellent exhibitions to his credit.

Dibbits also has a U.K. doctorate, from Cambridge, but he worked at Christie’s before joining the Rijksmuseum in 2002. There, he helped develop plans and layouts for the new Rijksmuseum, and he guided the purchase last month of the Adrien de Vries Bacchic Figure Supporting the Globe for $27.9 million at Christie’s.

Two other candidates, Emilie Gordenker, director of the Mauritshuis, and Axel Ruger, director of the van Gogh Museum, are no longer in the running, I’m told. Ruger, however, is a contender at a different museum, more about which in the future.

A caveat to all of this: I don’t have a direct line to Cameron or the NG trustees, but when one hears the same things from several sources who are not in the same circles you can usually assume that what you are hearing is close to the truth, if not the truth itself.

*UPDATE, 1/5: When I wrote this yesterday, I left out John Leighton, director of the Scottish National Galleries, who was definitely considered for the job, but–according to more than one source–decided that he would rather stay in Edinburgh. Now, I hear that he remains in contention.

This could be true for one good reason: I had heard that NG trustees felt that both Finaldi and Dibbits had flaws; it is conceivable that they chose Leighton as a compromise.

Retraction! Someone Goofed…

Hours after I published the announcement, drawn from a press release issued around 1:45 today by the Art Institute of Chicago, that the museum had hired Rebecca Long from the Indianapolis Museum of Art, another press release arrived from AIC. It said that it “kindly asks that that you refrain from utilizing the Institute’s press release sent on Monday, December 22 at approximately [12:45 pm CST].”

art-institute-chicagoBut it was too late. I was out, not near my computer when the second email arrived, and only now can I address the situation.

Here is the explanation AIC gave:

The release contained incomplete information and the Institute will be issuing an updated release in the coming days.

So please take my previous post with a grain of salt–something in it may be inaccurate. But AIC did not seem to say that the appointment was entirely wrong. I wait to see what the real announcement is, but I may be away from my computer if it arrives over the Christmas holidays, and unable to update you.

 

Another Defection From Indianapolis

The hard-hit Indianapolis Museum of Art lost another curator: Rebecca Long, currently Associate Curator of European Painting and Sculpture before 1800 at IMA, is moving to the Art Institute of Chicago. There, she will be the Associate Curator in the Department of Medieval to Modern European Painting and Sculpture, responsible for Italian and Spanish painting and sculpture before 1750.

RebeccaLong9-16-13Long will join AIC on Feb. 27, 2015.

After IMA’s other losses, this is a blow. There, she “spearheaded work on the forthcoming catalogue of the museum’s Clowes Collection, offering the first scholarly and technical analysis of that important collection of masterworks of the Italian, Spanish, Netherlandish and German schools.”

Long’s background, per the AIC:

A native of Pennsylvania, Long has held research fellowships at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies at Villa I Tatti, Florence, where she conducted research on 16th century Italian paintings in the IMA collection. Additional research she’s done has illuminated the work of itinerant artists, patronage in Italy and Spain as well as international markets for art of the early modern period. She has a B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh, with concentrations in art history and business administration, and a master’s degree from the Institute of Fine Arts at New York University, where she is currently pursuing a Ph.D. Her dissertation focuses on the role of Italian art and artists at the Spanish court in the early 17th century.

IMA hired Long in 2008.

 

Another Director’s Job Opens Up

While you were holiday shopping (maybe) on Friday, news broke that Susan L. Talbott will retire as director and C.E.O. of the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford. There’s no sign that anything is amiss, but up in Hartford–which has dismisssed or lost a few directors in recent years because of board relations and expectations–you never know.

SusanTalbotAnd she did say. “Looking ahead, I am eager to explore a different chapter in my life and career”–which isn’t quite “leaving to spend more time with my family,” but….

Talbott took over the museum in 2008 and plans to leave next fall, after a $33 million renovation, which upgraded and expanded the museum’s galleries, reopen.

Here’s how the museum recapped her career there:

Taking charge of a museum that needed repair and modernization, Talbott first tackled deferred maintenance and restoration of the Wadsworth Atheneum’s historic buildings…Connecticut awarded the Wadsworth Atheneum the remaining funds needed to complete its $33 million renovation, increasing public gallery space by more than 25% without any new construction. [She]…significantly increased efficiencies via the installation of a proprietary power plant and new HVAC system, as well as a state-of-the-art storage facility….Talbott also built a strong, competent staff of curatorial and administrative professionals, strengthening the core of personnel charged with continuing forward momentum into the future.

Talbott also took steps early in her tenure to increase and diversify the visitor pool while working to retain the museum’s core supporters, deepening the museum’s roots and broadening its reach into the local community….

Well, perhaps. But I’ve been disappointed by the exhibition schedule there, which I found somewhat mediocre –e.g., the coming show focusing on Coney Island–given the Atheneum’s illustrious history.

On the other hand, several acquisitions were good, such as: “…a generous gift from her friend and internationally renowned artist Richard Tuttle, titled, “Formal Narration”; the 2014 purchase of Artemisia Gentileschi’s masterpiece, “Self-Portrait as a Lute Player,” which will be unveiled to the public for the first time in 2015; a major bequest of Arts and Crafts furniture and decorative art by collector Stephen Gray; and purchases of important works by Georgia O’Keeffe, Martin Puryear, Sean Scully, Kiki Smith and Kara Walker.”

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Wadsworth Atheneum

Freer-Sackler Digitization Project: A Modest Suggestion

The other day, the Freer and Sackler Galleries of the Smithsonian announced that it had digitized its entire collection and was putting it all online for all to see and use–with more than 90 percent of the images in high-definition resolution and without copyright restrictions for noncommercial uses–as of Jan. 1, 2015. This is good news, and I applaud the initiative.

TextileCapture-1But another sentence in the press release stopped me: “The vast majority of the 40,000 artworks have never before been seen by the public…”

Now, I know full well that many museums own works whose quality isn’t up to par–and they should not displace better works, just to be shown. I am also fully aware that some museums keep works for study–and the Freer-Sackler is one of them. The release says there are more than 10,000 items in the Freer Stufy Collection, including multiple pages of certain manuscripts, textile fragments and the like. This collection is “used by scholars around the world for scientific research and reference.” I tend to like the open storage areas some museums are using for some collections, though I have no information about what the public thinks about them.

But I think museum should make use of some items they “never” show. Are any lendable to smaller museums? Could any be pulled into a small touring exhibition? If so, museums should do these things.

And if not, why not devote a small area–even one case or one small wall–for a rotating showing of artworks that are “never” shown? Maybe these items could be paired with something similar that is worthy of hanging in the galleries. Would that help teach the public some connoisseurship?  It might even prove enlightening about deaccessioning.

Museums have become so creative at trying new things, they seem to say to us. How about trying something with works in their storeroom? Maybe they would even turn up some wonderful. There’ve been a lot of cases like that in recent years.

Photo Credit: Hutomo Wicaksono /Freer and Sackler Galleries

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives