• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Artworks

Hidden Masterpieces: Science Takes Us Underneath The Paint

Out of the Shadows, a film by Kevin Sullivan about the use of advanced technology to discover the way artists work, made its debut in New York yesterday — a showing at the Winter Antiques Show at the Park Avenue Armory. I went to look, and concluded that it’s a good film for museums to screen — and build a program around.

dvd--oots.jpgMany museums have discovered that people like to see what art conservation is all about, and this film takes that interest and runs with it.

Narrated by Donald Sutherland, the documentary — don’t Google it, use the link above, because you will otherwise get a movie about depression – closely follows the stories of two paintings, Rembrandt’s Bearded Old Man and van Gogh’s The Patch of Grass. It shows how technology like x-ray fluorescence and 3D imaging and expertise – from scientists in Europe as well as at Cornell and Brookhaven National Laboratory — discovered paintings behind the surface of what we can all see and, in the Rembrandt’s case, led scholars to authenticate the picture as by him because of what’s underneath.

The hero is Joris Dik of the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, who has credentials in both art and science. He helped discover a Goya last year.

The film isn’t perfect, imho. It uses actors to play the parts of Rembrandt and his followers, for example, which is a little hokey. But they don’t speak, and their moments on screen are short. In a couple of places, it overdramatizes — but not too badly.

What it set out to do — show science in art — it does pretty well. Nicely, the film’s website provides not just the trailer, but also other video snippets that take you behind the scenes at the Rijksmuseum, the Kroller-Muller Museum, the Rotterdam museum, and other places prominent in the film, telling their stories. It explains a bit of the science, too.

I’d like to see the film get theatrical distribution, but it’s already available on DVD (above). That shouldn’t hold museums back, though. Visitors will pay (modestly) to see this and discuss it.

 

 

Spread The Word, With Christmas — Or Even Snowy — Paintings

Last year about this time, I praised the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art for circulating a press release, with photos, of some of the paintings and sculptures in its collection that publications could use to illustrate Christmas.

PetrusChristus.bmpI hoped the practice would spread:

What better way to illustrate the birth of Christ than with depictions of the scene that occupied so many great artists, many of whose works can be found in the nation’s museums? Let’s spread the idea next year to other cities.

Back in October, the Nelson-Atkins again circulated its list, with illustrations and a paragraph of explication. One of the works, by Petrus Christus, is at right.

But I haven’t been the recipient of any others… alas.

It doesn’t seem to have spread. So let me broaden the suggestion: publications need art — good art. Maybe they won’t run a religious work now as frequently as they used to. But museums have plenty of secular art — snowy scenes, for example — that would also work at this time of year, when there’s often a news drought.

I’m headed off for a white Christmas later today, but I’m leaving a post or two that will be published while I’m gone — so please check back.

And merry, merry to you all.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art

Oh Those Mona Lisa Eyes: Do They Reveal More Than We Know?

I’m still in Britain, metaphorically speaking: Last week, the Daily Mail published an entertaining story about the Mona Lisa, stating that Leonardo implanted tiny numbers and letters in the eyes of La Gioconda — a real life da Vinci code — that may contain clues about the Holy Grail.

Reminds of the days when we (some of us, anyway) played the Beatles’ recording of Revolution backward to find out if Paul was dead…

MonaLisaEye.jpgThe new story has Silvano Vinceti, president of Italy’s National Committee for Cultural Heritage, describing the symbols, which he said were invisible to the naked eye but clearly there when viewers deploy a magnifying glass.

In the right eye [at left] appear to be the letters LV which could well stand for his name, Leonardo da Vinci, while in the left eye there are also symbols but they are not as defined.

It is very difficult to make them out clearly but they appear to be the letters CE, or it could be the letter B.

In the arch of the bridge in the background the number 72 can be seen or it could be an L and the number 2.

Vinceti insists that the marks are not accidental, but definitely placed there by Leonardo.

Da Vinci put a special emphasis on the Mona Lisa and we know that in the last years of his life he took the painting with him everywhere.

We also know that da Vinci was very esoteric and used symbols in his work to give out messages.

Who knows, they may even ­possibly be a love message to the ­figure in the painting.

(I do wish Vinceti would call the artist “Leonardo,” not da Vinci.)

Vinceti, the Daily Mail says, is also part of a group that wants to exhume Leonardo’s remains, so they can determine if the Mona Lisa is a self-portrait.

I’m definitely against the exhumation, and I’m a skeptic about the letters/numbers.

After all, Paul still isn’t dead…

If any Leonardo experts out there disagree, I would love to hear.

You can read the entire story here. 

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Daily Mail

« Previous Page

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives