• Home
  • About
    • Plain English
    • Paul Levy
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Plain English

Paul Levy measures the Angles

Who’s responsible for The Donald? The Founding Fathers.

January 22, 2017 by Paul Levy 7 Comments

My cousin Jonathan’s witty Protest Banner

Last Friday Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States. Across the world this weekend millions, mostly women, have marched to protest the event. It is already said to be the largest protest march in the history of the U.S. The attitude of the Briton on the High Street is simple: it’s preposterous.  Not that it can’t happen here – after all, we have Nigel Farage and Jeremy Corbyn. Each is or has been leader of a political party, but neither of them had the remotest chance of becoming Prime Minister. That’s no thanks to them, but to the relative good sense of the British electorate. Of course, the UK electorate wobbles from time to time, but even the least educated Brit voter seems, at a minimum, able to judge what policies and candidates are in his own interests. My fellow Americans (I’m entitled to vote in both countries) seem unable to discern this in some respects – a lot of women and, apparently, some unemployed people, were Trumpistas, despite his blood-curdling misogyny and his billionaire-ish contempt for “losers.”

“Surely you’re not calling the American voters ‘preposterous’ as well?” you’ll say. Well, no, it’s the preposterous rules that govern US presidential elections that resulted in President Preposterous. The voters had the good sense and taste to prefer Hillary Clinton by a margin of nearly three million, we’ve been told – but the elegantly mad 18th century procedures by which we elect the president sometimes make the popular vote count for very little.

This will outrage more people than my insulting the Donald, I know, as even thoughtful fellow Americans worship their Constitution (almost as much as the unthinking ones revere the flag). But this religion is almost as wicked, and certainly as silly, as the evangelical fundamentalism to which so many of the flag-idolators cleave.

The political philosopher, Alan Ryan, has long castigated Constitution worship, and occasionally we read a piece by other sensible thinkers, who also point out that the sacred document has other flaws (such as the article that allows so many of us to carry the guns with which they slay so many others of us). However, it’s rare (and not really a good rhetorical move) to point out that it was written by men, great men, powerful thinkers, some of them, but who wore powdered wigs and kept slaves. Their mores were not ours, and we no longer have many of the problems the Constitution was designed to solve. Our problems are probably worse, certainly more dangerous for the other inhabitants of this planet, but they do not, on the whole, require the same structures and devices for their solution.

Indeed, despite a reference  to the Marquis de Condorcet and  the conclusion that “after 224 years, perhaps it is time to change the rules of the game,” the Nobel Economics laureates, Eric Maskin and Amartya Sen, don’t mention the 18th century in their analysis of the remedies available for the lunatic procedures and customs for choosing the American president. Obviously rational people would simply abolish the Electoral College and elect the president by the popular vote. But, in this respect, the American polity is not rational, and it won’t happen.  There is a superior system, Maskin and Sen argue in their superb piece in the New York Review, and it’s called majority rule (c.f. Condorcet), eliminating victory by plurality. The simplest change of all would require no Constitutional amendment, but only a change in the political party rulebooks – “to replace plurality rule by majority rule in state primaries.” Incidentally, on their calculations, had this election been based on majority rule, it is possible that last Friday would have seen the inauguration of President Bloomberg.

Filed Under: blogroll, elsewhere, Uncategorized

Comments

  1. L Ham says

    January 22, 2017 at 7:40 pm

    Actually, under the Parliamentary system the British PM is not elected by a popular vote, but picked by the elite of the ruling party. Some of the Founding Fathers like Adams and Hamilton feared the popular vote would result in mob rule (just look at the French Revolution…). So, perhaps not leaving the selection of a leader up to the masses is a safer bet?

    Reply
    • Danby says

      January 23, 2017 at 11:41 am

      The prime minister is normally the leader of the party that can command a majority of the House of Commons. The parties choose their leaders in different ways. Labour has a one party member one vote system based on a short list approved by members of the parliamentary Labour Party. The conservatives have another system involving Commons members selecting two candidates for the membership in the company to elect. I don’t think that either system really involves an elite electing the leader. Pretty much anyone can join either party.

      Reply
  2. Deborah says

    January 22, 2017 at 9:45 pm

    People seem to forget that the electoral college protects the states with less people. Those states would all be realized by just a few states with Hugh populations would choose the president. The smaller population states would have very little say in the Election.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Top AJBlogs For The Weekend Of 01.22.17 – ArtsJournal says:
    January 22, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    […] Who’s responsible for The Donald? The Founding Fathers. My cousin Jonathan’s witty Protest Banner Last Friday Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States. Across the world this weekend millions, mostly women, have marched to protest the event. It is already … read more AJBlog: Plain EnglishPublished 2017-01-22 […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (66.33.193.103) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (66.33.193.74) and so is spam.

    Reply
  2. Top AJBlogs For The Weekend Of 01.22.17 – ArtsJournal says:
    January 22, 2017 at 8:48 pm

    […] Who’s responsible for The Donald? The Founding Fathers.My cousin Jonathan’s witty Protest Banner Last Friday Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States. Across the world this weekend millions, mostly women, have marched to protest the event. It is already … read moreAJBlog: Plain EnglishPublished 2017-01-22 […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (174.136.12.75) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (104.31.76.192) and so is spam.

    Reply
  3. Top AJBlogs For The Weekend Of 01.22.17 | Meek Voices says:
    January 22, 2017 at 10:06 pm

    […] Who’s responsible for The Donald? The Founding Fathers.My cousin Jonathan’s witty Protest Banner Last Friday Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States. Across the world this weekend millions, mostly women, have marched to protest the event. It is already … read moreAJBlog: Plain EnglishPublished 2017-01-22 […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (159.253.137.109) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (104.28.25.79) and so is spam.

    Reply
  4. Top AJBlogs For The Weekend Of 01.22.17 | ADC Voice says:
    January 23, 2017 at 10:31 am

    […] Who’s responsible for The Donald? The Founding Fathers.My cousin Jonathan’s witty Protest Banner Last Friday Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States. Across the world this weekend millions, mostly women, have marched to protest the event. It is already … read moreAJBlog: Plain English Published 2017-01-22 […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (129.121.177.73) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP (143.95.1.142) and so is spam.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Paul Levy

is almost a citizen of the world, carrying the passports of the USA and the UK/EU. He wrote about the arts in general for the now-defunct Wall Street Journal Europe. [Read More]

Plain English

An Anglo-American look at what's happening here and there, where English is spoken and more or less understood -- in letters, the visual and performing arts, and, occasionally, in the kitchen or dining room. … [Read More...]

 RSS E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Peter Brown on Remembering Jaime Parladé, the Marquess who Made Marbella Chic: “Parlade’s work is my favorite of all interior designers…..his assemblage of what he likes and how he mixes it all…” Nov 5, 01:00
  • Hala Nasr on The chef, his wife, the British Army and all that fish: “Hi Paul, Thank you so much for writing this. I am doing research on Alexis Soyer. How did you hear…” Sep 22, 18:08
  • bob donovan on John Cornford, the tragedy of a faithful communist: “I really believe that John Cornford was most unusuall as well as courageous. I wish I could have known him.…” Apr 24, 02:03
  • Cathy Kelly (was Mascall). on Remembering Tony Staniland: “I came across this whilst looking for a contact for Anne and Tony. Our mum was great friends with them…” Apr 29, 10:23
  • BARRY HALLEN on Remembering Tony Staniland: “I’m thinking one of his children was Hilary Susan Staniland, the philosopher and a friend whom I met while we…” Apr 20, 16:46
January 2017
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec   Mar »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Love, Solace and Deadly Nightshade
  • Down Mexico Way (with a detour to Italy)
  • Obituary Hugh Cecil
  • A Slice of Life in Lockdown
  • The Young Rembrandt: not a prodigy

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in