• Home
  • About
    • Performance Monkey
    • David Jays
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Performance Monkey

David Jays on theatre and dance

Propwatch: the stuffed duck in Rutherford & Son

June 3, 2019 by David Jays Leave a Comment

There’s barely a scrap of frivolity in the Rutherford home. The home of a Tyneside manufacturing family in the 1910s, it’s imposing, substantial, stuffed to the gunwhales with heavy furniture – yet you struggle to spot anything that isn’t grimly functional or solid enough to break your toe should you drop it. Whatever else it is, the house of Rutherford is not a house of fun.

Githa Sowerby based Rutherford and Son (1912) on her own family; it’s an unsparing vision of the dead weight of joyless patriarchy. The designer of the National Theatre’s revival, Lizzie Clachan, cheerfully admits that her set is ‘actually quite hideous.’ Clachan can do spare or stark at the drop of a hat, but here she devotes herself to the house heaving. All manner of Edwardian impedimenta, plus ledgers stuffed into every crevice – it’s a working home that, like its stern patriarch (Roger Allam), never stops for play. A new daughter-in-law (Anjana Vasan) sews coloured bows on her baby’s bonnet, and everyone looks askance at her flighty London ways.

The Ruthfords are glass manufacturers, yet their home is almost devoid of light and shimmer – and as for transparency, forget it. Rutherford’s desiccated daughter has a secret love. His flailing older son has a secret invention. Father deceives and discards them both (I’ve seen scenery chewed in this role before, but Allam plays it dry – icily reasonable, only monstrous in his calm indifference to his brood). Vasan’s disregarded daughter-in-law also stays opaque – until the final scene, when she plays a bold hand.

Roger Allam (also above) and Anjana Vasan. Photos: Johan Persson

What else catches the eye? A photograph of the previous Rutherford on the wall, confirming that the fun-loving gene has skipped the dynasty altogether. Furniture so heavy with mahogany that everyone has to manoeuvre awkwardly around the room. Some trophy shields glower beside the staircase – probably relics of Rutherford’s champion athletics days, one of the few subjects which raises a flicker of pleasure.

But what’s that high above the mantel? A… stuffed duck? Neither use nor much in the way of ornament, but there it sits, a poorly-stuffed mallard. Why do the Rutherfords display a duck? Father doesn’t have fun, but he has pretensions. Despising humanity, he nonetheless wants to hoist his children up the social ladder. That’s his secret weakness – a yen he doesn’t know what to do with that becomes another family torment. For the daughter (Justine Mitchell), that means being forbidden to play with her village peers or entertain their advances when older. For the oldest son – poor, lost John (Sam Troughton) – it meant a miserable year at Harrow and a few aristocratic encounters of excruciating embarrassment. One schoolchum, we’re told, invited him to join a weekend shooting party. Not a success. He hasn’t got over it, and is still furiously trying to prove his worth.

But is that where the duck comes from? The only thing John shot, possibly by accident? A pity prize, gifted by a sneering nob? Swiped from the kitchens to save face on return? Who knows, but this paltry bit of poultry stands in for the gentility on which Rutherford’s sights are grimly set. The house is emptier by the end of the play: Rutherford’s company is floundering, he’s squandered his own family’s affections. The duck, that sullen lump of taxidermy, remains. Much good may it do.

Follow David on Twitter: @mrdavidjays

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: National Theatre, props, propwatch, theatre

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

David Jays

I am a writer and critic on performance, books and film and currently write for, among others, the Sunday Times and the Guardian. I edit Dance Gazette, the magazine of the Royal Academy of Dance. I’m also a lifelong Londoner: it’s the perfect city for connecting to art forms that both look back and spring forward. [Read More]

Performance Monkey

This is what theatre and dance audiences do: we sit in the dark, watching performances. And then, if it seems worth it, we think about what we've seen, and how it made us feel. The blog should be a conversation, so please comment on the posts and add your thoughts. You know what I've always … [Read More...]

@mrdavidjays

Tweets by @mrdavidjays

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Veronica Horwell on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Know what you mean about the underpowered pre-17late90s shoulder: a bottle slope approach to body outline — the Hamilton coats…” Jul 8, 13:41
  • Sarah Lenton on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Blimey. A tour de force! Hugely enjoyable. Slight demur on whether a period raised fist would have produced a scrunched…” Jul 7, 21:44
  • william osborne on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “An article that analyzes the serious problems with “Hamilton” by Ed Morales, a journalist and lecturer at Columbia University’s Center…” Jul 7, 20:20
  • william osborne on Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17: “Indeed, in the late 18th century people learned that properly toned-down attire was important for slave owners proclaiming democracy. And…” Jul 7, 19:28
  • David Jays on Bringing Up Baby | Lockdown Theatre Club 16: “Hello Ana, and thanks so much for this. Joining in is, I hope, easy: we all find the film on…” Jul 3, 16:02
June 2019
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« May   Jul »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Hamilton | Lockdown Theatre Club 17
  • Bringing Up Baby | Lockdown Theatre Club 16
  • The Go-Between | Lockdown Theatre Club 14
  • Girlhood | Lockdown Theatre Club 13
  • All That Jazz | Lockdown Theatre Club 12

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in