• Home
  • About
    • Engaging Matters
    • Doug Borwick
    • Backstory-Ground Rules
    • Contact
  • Resources
    • Building Communities, Not Audiences
    • Engage Now! A Guide to Making the Arts Indispensable
  • EM’s List
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Engaging Matters

Doug Borwick on vibrant arts and communities

Arts Predispositions II: Maybes

February 11, 2015 by Doug Borwick

Crowd-CroppedIn my last post, Arts Predispositions I: Yeses, I introduced the notion of categories in the universe of those who do not take advantage of the arts we present. This thinking is based on work of Bradley Morrison and Julie Dalgleish in the early 1990’s presented in Waiting in the Wings. A central feature of that book was an understanding of the population as a whole being divided into Yeses, Maybes, and Noes with respect to arts participation. Yeses were those predisposed to be arts patrons. Noes were infants, the infirmed, and the incarcerated. All others were considered to be Maybes.

My gloss on that is to further subdivide those groups and, to an extent, expand the range of Noes. This is the outline of the current state of my thinking:

Arts Predispositions
Yeses
Maybes

  • Backsliders
  • Blissfully Unaware
  • Apathetes/Agnostics

Noes

  • Cultural
  • Structural
  • Actual

What follow picks up from my last post.

Maybes
Maybes are potentially “winnable” without significant alteration in programmatic content. They share sufficient cultural background with work presented by the arts institution for it not to feel completely foreign or unwelcoming. However, culturally conditioned norms with respect to dress, decorum, or demeanor in arts presentation settings can be off-putting to a degree that makes engaging with them difficult. Addressing these issues is often necessary in efforts to reach Maybes. (The National Endowment for the Arts 2015 publication, A Decade of Arts Engagement–NEA Research Report #58, identified a category–“interested non-attendees”–that is parallel to the Maybes discussed here.)

The tongue-in-cheek categories suggested here subdivide Maybes in ways that might be helpful in developing plans for reaching them. In each case, real consideration must be given to messaging, times/venues, complementary experiences, and, most importantly, relationship building.

  • Backsliders

In religious circles, backsliders are sometimes defined as saved persons who have fallen into sin. For the purposes here, this category consists of those who have arts experiences but for some reason are no longer active. A large subset of this group may be those who have been brought into the arts–usually performing arts–through some form of “pops” presentation but have not maintained a relationship with the organization that did so.

Backsliders have sufficient interest, education, or experience to have made arts participation part of their life in the past but no longer make it enough of a priority to attend arts events. Understanding their reasons for non-participation is critical to engaging with this group.

  • Blissfully Unaware

The “blissfully unaware” have no negative experiences or attitudes toward the arts but have simply not ever had arts participation occur to them as an option to consider. They may have some general cultural baggage of the “the arts are not for me” kind, but this is not an article of faith for them. The arts are simply not on their radar screen.

  • Apathetes/Agnostics

Related to the blissfully unaware, apathetes/agnostics are aware of the arts as an option but simply have no opinion about or pull toward arts consumption or participation. Again, since they have little negative predisposition they are “winnable,” but intentionality of effort is required.

Next time: Noes
(Still exciting, right?)

Engage!

Doug

Photo:Attribution Some rights reserved by Kyle Taylor, Dream It. Do It.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: Principles, The Practice of Engagement Tagged With: arts, community engagement, marketing, relationships

About Doug Borwick

Doug Borwick is a past President of the Board of the Association of Arts Administration Educators and was for nearly 30 years Director of the Arts Management and Not-for-Profit Management Programs at Salem College in Winston-Salem, NC. He is CEO of Outfitters4, Inc., providing management services to nonprofit organizations and ArtsEngaged providing training and consultation to artists and arts organization to help them more effectively engage with their communities. [Read More …]

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,552 other subscribers

About Engaging Matters

The arts began as collective activity around the campfire, expressions of community. In a very real sense, the community owned that expression. Over time, with increasing specialization of labor, the arts– especially Western “high arts”– became … [Read More...]

Books

Community Engagement: Why and How

Building Communities, Not Audiences: The Future of the Arts in the United States Engage Now! A Guide to Making the Arts Indispensable[Purchase info below] I have to be honest, I haven’t finished it yet because I’m constantly having to digest the ‘YES’ and ‘AMEN’ moments I get from each … [Read More...]

Gard Foundation Calls for Stories

The Robert E. Gard Foundation is dedicated to fostering healthy communities through arts-based development, it is currently seeking stories from communities in which the arts have improved the lives of citizens in remarkable ways. These stories can either be full descriptions (400-900 words) with photos, video, and web links or mini stories (ca. 200 words) […]

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Jerry Yoshitomi on Deserving Attention: “Doug: Thank you very much for this. I am assuming that much of the local sports coverage is of high…” Mar 25, 16:28
  • Alan Harrison on Deadly Sin: II: ““Yes, but it’s Shakespeare!” is a phrase I heard for years in defending the production of the poetry from several…” Feb 17, 19:38
  • Doug Borwick on Deadly Sin: I: “Excellent question.” Feb 11, 16:08
  • Jerry Yoshitomi on Deadly Sin: I: “When I first came into the field and I met our leadership, it seemed to me that ‘arrogance’ was a…” Feb 10, 15:36
  • Doug Borwick on Cutting Back: “Thanks for the kind words. Hope you are well.” Oct 2, 06:58

Tags

arrogance artcentricity artists arts board of directors business model change community community engagement creativity dance diversity education equity evaluation examples excellence funding fundraising future governance gradualism implementation inclusion instrumental international Intrinsic mainstreaming management marketing mission museums music participation partnership programming public good public policy relationships research Robert E. Gard Foundation simplicity structure terminology theatre
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in