• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Five Highlight Reads From This Week’s AJ: Did Originality Steer The Arts Wrong?

January 15, 2017 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

This Week: The Trump era is a challenge to America’s arts institutions… Artificial intelligence is teaching us how to better-design concert halls… How originality has failed art… The Metropolitans Museum and Opera are struggling… Is Canada becoming the first “post-nation” state?

  1. The Role Of Arts Institutions In The Era Of Trump: As what follows any seismic shift in the landscape, artists and arts institutions are trying to figure out their roles in the Trump era. This week there was controversy when the St. Louis Art Museum agreed to allow one of its paintings to be transported to Washington DC to be hung for the inaugural. Protests quickly ensued, writes Phil Kennicott in the Washington Post. “The petition, and the flurry of attention it raised, is important as a moment of what might be called the ‘stress testing’ of this country’s cultural institutions. As Trump opponents look to the next four years, they want to know how much cultural and moral capital is stored in the institutions they love. Will museums and universities and arts centers be up to the challenge of confrontation, resistance and truth-telling?”
  2. What We’re Learning As Technology Starts Designing More Of Our Theatres: Hamburg’s by-all-accounts brilliant new concert hall, the Elbphilharmonie was the product of great designers. But those great designers had the benefit of some amazing algorithms that helped determine the ideal acoustical form. “The auditorium—the largest of three concert halls in the Elbphilharmonie—is a product of parametric design, a process by which designers use algorithms to develop an object’s form. Algorithms have helped design bridges, motorcycle parts, typefaces—even chairs. In the case of the Elbphilharmonie, Herzog and De Meuron used algorithms to generate a unique shape for each of the 10,000 gypsum fiber acoustic panels that line the auditorium’s walls like the interlocking pieces of a giant, undulating puzzle.” So a question: As artificial intelligence gets better at designing spaces, what will we discover about ideal spaces for performances? And will our current halls, many of them guesses about what works, be deemed obsolete the way America’s stadiums and arenas from the 1960s and 70s were?
  3.  Art, Creativity and Originality – They Aren’t Interchangeable: Somehow, a cult of originality has dominated new creativity in the past century. But Michael Lind argues provocatively that originality has been a destroyer of art rather than an engine of progress. “In the last century, originality has killed one once-flourishing art form after another, by replacing variation within shared artistic conventions to rebellion against convention itself. The moment artists were taught to consider themselves superior mutant creative geniuses rather than practitioners of traditional crafts, it was only a matter of time before some would get tired of creative variation within the inherited conventions of their art and start rejecting the basic conventions.”
  4. New York’s Iconic Metroplitans Struggle: Yes, both the Museum and Opera are hitting rough patches. The Opera is having difficulties filling its seats, even while it’s offering up some of the best singers in the world, writes James Jordan in the Observer. “The reasons for the Met’s less than spectacular performance at the box office remain somewhat obscure, particularly since, on a day to day basis, the company offers what is likely the strongest casting of any opera company in the world.” Indeed, the Met is in the middle of “a golden age of vocalism.” Meanwhile, while the Met Museum has no problem bloating its galleries with fans, the money part of the operation continues to be challenging. The museum has had to put off its much-anticipated new contemporary wing because of financial stress. The museum had hoped to open the extension to its main building for its 150th anniversary in 2020; now even the groundbreaking is seven years or more away.
  5. Is Canada The First “Post-Nation” State? Canadians have a very different view of immigration than does Europe or the US. “Ten years ago, two-thirds of population increase was courtesy of immigration. By 2030, it is projected to be 100%. The economic benefits are also self-evident, especially if full citizenship is the agreed goal. All that “settlers” – ie, Canadians who are not indigenous to the land – need do is look in the mirror to recognize the generally happy ending of an immigrant saga. Our government repeats it, our statistics confirm it, our own eyes and ears register it: diversity fuels, not undermines, prosperity.”
Image:Jacqui Oakley/The Guardian

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Weekly AJ Top Stories

Comments

  1. richard kooyman says

    January 15, 2017 at 4:35 pm

    I’d like to push back on the fact that you even included Michael Lind’s revisionist opinion of the art world as something that we should read. What qualifies Lind, who writes about war and economics to profess such a misshaped view of Art?
    When Lind writes that, “The moment artists were taught to consider themselves superior mutant creative geniuses rather than practitioners of traditional crafts” it’s not only offensive to artists, it’s just not true.
    The fact that Lind considered his art history education a “waste of time” and lumps all of contemporary art history as “fads and fashion” is not only a pathetically sad commentary, it’s a dangerous one for the arts now that we are entering the Trump era.

    Reply
    • Douglas McLennan says

      January 18, 2017 at 3:31 pm

      Richard: I included it because I think it’s important to hear other views of what people think is and isn’t art and art’s role in our lives. I think it’s particularly important in the Trump era because I see many artists struggling to define for themselves the role of artists in our society. I think the Trump election has made many question what they thought they knew about America and resolve to be clear about their values and how they express them.

      Reply
  2. william osborne says

    January 15, 2017 at 11:31 pm

    Our classist educational system, which is centered around white privilege, will not be very effective in opposing Trump. Some stats here:

    http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/07/31/report-higher-education-creates-white-racial-privilege

    Our highly classist education system – an unfortunate legacy of the worst side of our British heritage – gives our intellectuals such a deep sense of entitlement and insularity that the thoughts and concerns of the working class become veiled, impalpable, out of sight and out of mind. Our intellectuals thus did not see the political cataclysm that was coming, and they have even less understanding about how to address it.

    It might also be worth noting that in continental Europe, private universities are forbidden by law due to the social injustices they create. And university education is free. There is no such thing as student debt in continental Europe. It is no surprise that the political perspectives of continental intellectuals as a whole sharply contrast with their American counterparts.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Douglas McLennan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,846 other subscribers

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • Margy Waller on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “THIS x — I’ve been wanting this so much. We need a think tank — or a think tank with…” Sep 10, 12:28
  • Franklin on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “William, Ahem, so where’s our Dutch Golden Age? We’re to take such narrowly viewed and decontextualized anomalies as a norm?…” Sep 2, 07:52
  • william osborne on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Ahem, so where’s our Dutch Golden Age? We’re to take such narrowly viewed and decontextualized anomalies as a norm? It’s…” Sep 1, 06:13
  • Franklin on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “I agree with Douglas that public arts funding is too politically fraught in the United States to grow it to…” Aug 31, 11:55
  • william osborne on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “About “static models.” Private funding systems are sometimes promoted exactly because they are thought to be more flexible than public…” Aug 30, 15:56
  • william osborne on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Douglas comments that our current private funding model “no longer works as it was intended, so we need to rethink.”…” Aug 30, 15:18
  • Douglas McLennan on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Franklin – thanks for this. Very useful. A few things – your example of the movies – the creative side…” Aug 30, 12:28
  • Douglas McLennan on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Earl: This is a whole different topic of course, but one I’ve been thinking about for a long time. I…” Aug 30, 08:41
  • Franklin on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Sorry, “in conjunction with one another” in the first paragraph, and not really influence peddling in the last one, but…” Aug 30, 04:25
  • Earl G. Blackburn on Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea: “Douglas, I can’t thank you enough for this post. I’ve been working on a new model of executing management for…” Aug 29, 21:46

Top Posts

  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?
  • If It Was Just About The Money We'd All Be Making Porn
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?
  • Join Us Today For A Livestream: Artistic Leadership In A Border City

Recent Posts

  • Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea August 23, 2020
  • Five Things to Fix in the Arts August 9, 2020
  • How Technology is Shaping Opera May 18, 2020
  • Parlez-Vous Screen? (online arts and other considerations) May 1, 2020
  • Arts: Rebuild What? And Why? April 30, 2020
January 2017
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec   Feb »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Five Things: #1. Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea
  • Five Things to Fix in the Arts
  • How Technology is Shaping Opera
  • Parlez-Vous Screen? (online arts and other considerations)
  • Arts: Rebuild What? And Why?

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.