• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

British Orchestras – Bigger Audiences For Less Money

January 27, 2014 by Douglas McLennan 2 Comments

British orchestras report an increase in attendees – a 16 percent increase no less – over an earlier three-year period:

A survey by the Association of British Orchestras (ABO) has found attendances at concerts and performances between 2012 and 2013 were up 16 per cent on those  three years earlier. More than 4.5 million people a year now see orchestras play live in the UK.

But earned income is down substantially:

p17orchestraEPA

Image: The Independent (UK)

..news of growth in attendance has not translated into huge returns at the box office, as income from ticket sales and contract hires has fallen 11 per cent over the same period, according to the survey. And added to this a 14 per cent decline, in real terms, in public funding.

Add the numbers and you have more people attending orchestra concerts at significantly cheaper prices. And presumably, one might suppose that the audience for orchestras has increased even more because of digital access. So more people, less money. That sounds like the situation for pretty much any creative industry these days as they grapple with changes in audience behavior brought about by the internet.

The question is, given the subsidy model that orchestras operate in: what is the tolerable rate of subsidy? Fifty percent? 60? 90? Whatever it is, it’s not keeping up with covering costs – even with an increase in audience – paying lower prices. This isn’t just happening for orchestras or the arts. Pop musicians are having to change the subsidy model for their work too.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: culture business models

Comments

  1. william osborne says

    January 28, 2014 at 12:00 am

    Something doesn’t add up with these British numbers – or at least something seems strange. UK orchestras are averaging 4.5 million visitors per year. Germany has 132 state owned and operated orchestras. In the 2011/2012 season German orchestras had 4,290,886 “visitors” – about 200,000 less. For the attendance stats in Germany see:

    http://www.miz.org/intern/uploads/statistik20.pdf

    This leads to some interesting questions:

    + Why would the UK, with far few orchestras per capita, and only about 3/4ths the population have more people attending concerts than Germany?
    + Why would more people attend concerts in the UK when orchestras have historically been much more deeply rooted in German culture?
    + Why would more people attend in the UK when government subsides for German orchestras are much higher? The German government pays for 60% of every orchestra ticket sold. For the stats see:

    http://www.miz.org/intern/uploads/statistik26.pdf

    When we note that earned income for UK orchestras is down 11% while attendance is up 16% something here too seems odd. Has the BOA shuffled the numbers to make a case for more subsidies? It would certainly have the incentive. Or is something far more complex going on that would account for these odd discrepancies between the UK and Germany?

    –William Osborne
    http://www.osborne-conant.org

    Reply
    • Douglas McLennan says

      January 28, 2014 at 6:21 am

      More free concerts in the UK?

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
January 2014
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Dec   Jan »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in